Chris's Non-Inductive Coil Experiment

  • 1.9K Views
  • Last Post 1 weeks ago
Chris posted this 08 October 2019

My Friends,

I am going to show a small experiment, one that follows the works of Andrey Melnichenko and even Tariel Kapanadze's works and as we know many others.

 

 

We have discussed here before, the fact that H3 is H3 simply because H1 and H2 cancel out: H1 + H2 + H3 = H3, why is this so, because H1 is Positive and H2 is Negative! We have seen this equation before: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1.

I think with Fighter's success recently, its time for some hands on!

  • First Layer: 88 Turns.
  • Second Layer: 43 Turns.

 

Layer One:

 

Layer Two:

 

Turns Direction:

 

Layer One Inductance:

 

Layer Two Inductance:

 

Non-Inductive Connected:

 

Layer One Resistance:

 

Layer Two Resistance:

 

Closed Loop Resistance:

 

My Coil, like Andrey Melnichenko's, is 0.33 + -0.33 + 0.33 = 0.33.

Two thirds of my Coil is canceled out. My Circuit looking like this:

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive.
  • L3 is Inductive.

 

If this Coil is carrying 1 Ampere of Current, and exactly one half of the Coil is Non-Inductive, then Turn for Turn, only 45 Turns will create an M.M.F, which is considered as 45 Turns x 1 Ampere = 45 Ampere Turns or 45At.

Science tells us, that Turn for Turn, where we have Non-Inductive part of the Coil, this part of the Coil does nothing! Creates no Magnetic Field, therefore does nothing.

However, from Experiment, we know that this part of the Coil DOES do something! Remember Floyd Sweets paper: Nothing is Something, this is the same!

At Resonance, we have a perfect Standing Wave! We know this as Magnetic Resonance! Where each Magnetic Field is 180 Degrees out of phase:

 

Now, straight away, we should see a problem! Why? Kirchhoff's Current Law says the Current must be equal at every node, but we have Turn for Turn, one Coil that is Inductively Zero, and another Coil that has only a part of the Induction canceled!

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right. Current to the right is:

I = da+ / dt + da- / dt

Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

 

Each node does not equal the other, so the Circuit must balance out, Current is Increased as the Standing wave shows us.

Remember what Induction is? See here: Non-Linear Inductance

Induction gives us an approximation on the Coils ability to carry a Current: L = ε / di / dt

By Bringing a Coil arrangement like this into Resonance is our task.

Where each Electromagnetic Wave travels in opposite directions. One through the other in the same space.

THE NATURE OF SPACE

Space itself is the ability to accommodate energy. Consider for a moment the following illustration:

A signal (energy) is transmitted from point A to point B. A and B are separated by a finite distance. Consider three periods of time:

  • The signal is launched from A.
  • 2) The signal resides in the space between A and B.
  • 3) The signal arrives at B.

If (3) occurs simultaneously with (1) we say that the signal has traveled at infinite velocity. The signal has never resided in the intervening space and therefore there exists no space between A and B. A is virtually at the same point in space as B. For real space to exist between A and B it is necessary that a signal travelling between them be "lost" with reference to both points for a finite period of time.

Now we know that for real space to exist between two points a signal travelling between them will propagate at a finite velocity c, ( c = 1 / √με )

If a signal will not travel between two points, as in the case when c = 0, then we can also conclude that there is no link or intervening space between them. 

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

Floyd Sweet tried very hard to make c = 0! What does this mean? It is simply a Standing Wave, a Team Wave was used:

It is a simple matter using the equations E / H = √με and c = 1 / √με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field.

Ref: Floyd Sweet - Nothing is Something.

 

I have pointed out: Why 'C' is equal to One in these Devices.

We have a lot of data!

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 08 October 2019

My Friends,

I am going to show Transformer Coupling, to drive my Experiment.

Input Coil Turns: 2 Layers 37 + 39 = 76 Turns.

The Input Coil:

 

Input Coil Inductance:

 

Input Coil Resistance:

 

You can see, I have less turns than the single Layer on my Output Coil, first layer, but the Inductance is higher:

  • 84 Turns compared to 76
  • Inductance of 395 compared to 412

 

Geometry, the Length of the Coil plays a role here.

The Resistance is almost the same: 0.4 compared to 0.4, no visible difference.

Next, I will show the drive on the Coil, from my Switching Unit.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 09 October 2019

Excellent Chris

I think the junction between L2 and L3 will give you double the input power?


Jagau

Chris posted this 09 October 2019

Hey Jagau,

When you say:

I think the junction between L2 and L3 will give you double the input power?

 

I think the Current will double, but double from what to what, I will show more soon.

Best wishes

   Chris

Jagau posted this 09 October 2019

Sorry I thought it was a replication of melnichenko when he said this

 

Since the current in the coils of the same, we believe the resulting voltage in the time T2 is twice to the accumulation of energy
expended at the time t1.

 

Jagau

Chris posted this 09 October 2019

Sorry I thought it was a replication of melnichenko when he said this

 

Since the current in the coils of the same, we believe the resulting voltage in the time T2 is twice to the accumulation of energy
expended at the time t1.

 

Jagau

 

Hey Jagau,

Yes, you are correct in this situation! As we have 2x the turns on the First Layer and the Capacitor is directly connected through the Diode, then 2X the Voltage will be present at the terminals.

 

This is of course only true when the Coil: L2 is shorted in the above diagram. When L2 is un-shorted, then the Circuit will only have the Voltage of a Single Coil.

I have a little more to add soon.

   Chris

Chris posted this 09 October 2019

Hey Jagau,

I was called away, sorry.

We have some open doors with the above circuit, it is not clear, and in-fact it is confusing as to its operation. I want to specifically show something. The Circuit above compared to this circuit:

 

We are looking at some circuit differences! In fact, we have several different Circuits in the document here: Генератор на нелинейной индуктивности

What we know to be true, is the Circuit used is more like this:

 

Which as we know was the working model, when it was stated:

A working model by Valery, free-energy@list.ru.

Improving the coach, you can create the perfect coach, but first-class car - barely. (Edward de Bono)

Energy generator in the nonlinear inductance

Developed and assembled the unit with an efficiency of greater than 1. Working in self-maintaining, with the releasing enormous amounts of energy it takes to glow lamps. Valery.

 

We know this to be in-accurate! We know from research the circuit was the Circuit pointed out above, and again here:

 

 

You can find a lot of data here: Akula's circuits- is this the principle?

 

The quote:

The essence of the research: obtain convincing theoretical, computational and experimental evidence for the possibility transgeneratsii electricity from non-additive (non-linear) properties of the energy of electromagnetic fields and waves. The experiments are quite simple and easily reproducible in any special laboratory. This work is the development of some interesting ideas about the physics of Tesla radio and the possibility of generating energy from non-linearity of the energy field. The work is not contrary to modern physics, electrodynamics, well grounded in theory.

Ref: Andrey Melnichenko - Common-mode interference of electromagnetic waves and transgeneratsiya energies.

 

The point, I am trying to make is, we must follow the path of proof. Proof, hard data is going to be where we make huge leaps forward like we already have!

The document: Transgeneratsiya electromagnetic field energy, make a huge effort to deal with Electromagnetic Waves and specifically:

So we see that for the addition of two opposite-traveling electromagnetic waves resulting electromagnetic wave power increases by four times.

 

The method of operation is Electromagnetic Waves in Opposition.

I hope this research helps some!

   Chris

Chris posted this 11 October 2019

My Friends,

Its taken a while, I have been pulled away a few times and also had a few other problems to deal with.

The following Video is Long, so beware. Its also a video aimed for beginners!

 

I hope these experiments prove to be useful to others!

   Chris

Chris posted this 11 October 2019

My Friends,

Another Video, this time a bit of understanding on what we saw in the Experiment in the first video.

 

I hope this video is useful for all!

   Chris

Vidura posted this 11 October 2019

Very well done this video, really good and simple explanation of the principles, I recommend to all to watch it, it is also good for those with advanced understanding to keep in mind the basic mode of operation, the goal to reach. Vidura.

Chris posted this 13 October 2019

My Friends,

As I said in the last video, I needed to drop my turns down on my Input Coil. This is an Image:

 

So now I have an input Coil of: 12 Turns.

This is a difference of: 76 - 12 = 64 Turns. Also because, as was also stated, we have whats called Unity Coupling now, we should get much better Coupling from Input to Output.

Remembering, we do only have an effective 45 turn to 12 turn Coupling. So that's a step up of: 3.75

A video is currently being processed.

   Chris

Chris posted this 16 October 2019

Hey guys,

Well, the last week has been very busy!

I must Apologise. This video is very bits and piecy! Many distractions and a few technical problems has led to a video that may hold value, but will require a patient viewing.

 

A lot of info in this video, much of it is known, some is to try to encourage forward thinking.

The next video will be more helpful!

   Chris

Chris posted this 16 October 2019

My Friends,

I ask you the question: "Whats the biggest problem we have seen in my videos"?

 

I let you ponder this...

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 16 October 2019

Hey Chris,

excellent video to make our brain work.
One of the recurring problems that I see is taking measurements with the right tools and the right technique.


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 16 October 2019

Hey Jagau,

when you say:

taking measurements with the right tools and the right technique.

 

Would you mind expanding what you mean? 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 16 October 2019

In the thread of Vidura ''measures'' we talk about it extensively but it is good to refresh our memory.
A good link for the technique:
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/average-voltage.html

For measuring devices, some voltmeters are not at all effective and often can be misleading depending on how they are built.
Towards the end of your video we see it at 31:50 the oscilloscope is more accurate than the multimeter.
Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 17 October 2019

Hey Jagau,

Yes, Digital Multi-meters ( DMM's ) are a very rough estimation and should not be considered accurate if one is working at reasonable frequencies.

in the mean time, how about:

"Whats the biggest problem we have seen in my videos"?

 

Any ideas on what the biggest problem is?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Vidura posted this 17 October 2019

Hey Chris, I like the accuracy in your coil build. Regarding the question I would say it is not resonant still, that is the difficulty. Note that the formula for the antenna resonance references to longitudinal waves, I would guess in your experiment the waves are transverse, maybe the energy level is too low to setup predominantly longitudinal oscillation? Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Zanzal posted this 17 October 2019

Hey Chris,

You asked, what is the problem with your videos? That's a very subjective question. The most generic answer is that you need to identify your audience - those who you think will or who you want to benefit from seeing your video - then you need to tailor your content to convey the message you want that audience to receive. Not everyone can appreciate every video, some videos will be more helpful to those at a certain level of experience. People may complain, but those people who complain may not be your audience anyway.

I personally would recommend you just focus on producing what you want to produce and not worry about what anyone thinks, but since you asked, regarding your video for me it spends a lot of time showing what could be shown in a much shorter video. If you wanted to demonstrate 3 different configurations to show which had better results, it could be done in much less time. For me it was 1 minute of new information, spread across 40 minutes. Don't feel bad though, I watch a lot of videos on 2X play speed because it is common for people to be long-winded. That's just me. I think it is nice of you to share your experiments and no need to worry about what anyone thinks.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 17 October 2019

Hey Vidura,

Thank You wink

Excellent answer, yes, you are right. However I was thinking a little closer to the operation of the system.

We know in the last video, video three, we could not get the Voltage up, even with a 1 : 3.75 ratio, that there was a choking effect. This was evident on all the coils and in this video, I show a little more, a problem that we could say The Conservation of Energy Law is Invoking at its last possible chance:

 

This is a very important effect, one that produces failures in experiments and gives some a final conclusion, e.g: "it cant be done"... cry

As far as I know, never been shown before, new and previously not noted or documented.

I hope this video is much better received than the last, the last was such a problem to get finished!

   Chris 

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
Chris posted this 17 October 2019

Hey Chris,

You asked, what is the problem with your videos?

 

Hey Zanzal,

I think you have misunderstood the question I asked?

I meant the Technical problem, identifying technical problems is the goal... not so much the "long winded" problem, but thank you for pointing that out! 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Zanzal posted this 17 October 2019

I apologize Chris. I don't think I understand your question. Since you asked the question multiple times today I figured you must really want someone to try to answer. Maybe you could elaborate on the kinds of answers you are looking for by giving some examples of what you expect we might say?

If you are asking something along the lines of what might we have done differently? I think for me it looked like your secondaries are both wound the same direction. I might have been tempted to wind one of them in the opposite direction. Not sure if that is what you are getting at or not.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 17 October 2019

My Friends,

The video: "Non-Inductive Coil Experiment - Video Four" gives us a specialized effect related to a years long problem!

 

Please, for all members, what might be the techniques we could use to over come the worst of the problem we are seeing? To remove the effect from our system, so we can by-pass The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Energy can not be Created nor Destroyed?

Of course, technically, we never create or Destroy, we Pump from the Source!

I don't expect the establishment to ever understand that, not this decade anyway!

   Chris

Hopeful1 posted this 17 October 2019

G'day Chris,

Thanks for the video.What I got out of it was a good lesson in reading  an oscilloscope. I have bought a good one but need some lessons in how to decipher what the wave forms mean.So thanks again for spending the time and sharing your hard earned knowledge.

Tony

Chris posted this 17 October 2019

Hey Hopeful1,

Yes, for sure there is a bit of a learning curve on scopes. Perhaps we start a new thread on learning the oscilloscope, it is certainly a good idea!

I am certainly not an expert, however we have many experts here!

I am happy to help when I can!

The Magnetic Fields in the Core and the Coils all Interact together, there is a battle, and we need to get the Coils Voltage up so they can carry a good Current!

   Chris

 

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Fighter
Jagau posted this 18 October 2019

hi Chris

 To remove the effect from our system, so we can by-pass The Second Law of Thermodynamics, Energy can not be Created nor Destroyed?

Of course, technically, we never create or Destroy, we Pump from the Source!


You probably meant that we consume and return to the source of energy used?

Jagau

Chris posted this 18 October 2019

Hey Jagau

Yes, exactly, there is only ever a Transformation Process.

This Transformation Process only ever Transforms one Energy to another, then a huge circle occurs, from one Transformation to another and so on...

Tom Bearden's Source Charge shows this:

 

I hope we all realise this.

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 5 weeks ago

i like your recent video series chris. good late night viewing ;=D.  - finally i finished the replication today. successful of course, but thats because it isnt OU. something i am still chasing via many means.    magnets and wire. i have working.  but transformers are a litttle out of my reach sadly ...  although every month im becoming more and more comfortable with the fact our planet does not have free energy products.  - because its really bloody difficult.

nice work with your scope too buddy.

Fighter posted this 5 weeks ago

although every month im becoming more and more comfortable with the fact our planet does not have free energy products.  - because its really bloody difficult.

Not entirely true, Patrick. Our planet have free energy products, it's just those products are kept in military black projects and people are not allowed to have that. Yet. That's why we all are here, to change that.

Every time I see some news about UFOs flying in our planet's sky or in orbit it's a motivation to continue on this way, I'm telling myself "Those guys, no matter if they are our military or if they are just visitors, are powering their ships with free energy and have anti-gravity engines. It's everything right under our nose, they're showing us these technologies and the path we must follow...". 'Cause I'm 100% sure those ships don't have immense reservoirs with fuel on board to get the energy they need to do all the incredible things they do in our skies.

So no, the only reasons we civilians don't have free energy (yet) it's not because this planet don't have the technology, it's just because some greedy morons want to keep that technology just for themselves even if they obtained it in black projects using trillions of dollars took from our civilian pockets.

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • raivope
Chris posted this 5 weeks ago

My Friends,

A learning video, making discoveries and working toward Magnetic Resonance:

 

I show many problems, and give some answers! We have a new video coming soon and the next one will be just a little better again!

We must do the small experiments to move forward!

   Chris

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

My Friends,

Solutions to problems come from our intellect. What is our intellect?

the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially with regard to abstract matters.

Ref: Oxford Dictionary - Lexico

 

Our experience gives us the ability to use our Intellect to solve the problems we face! Today's video is about solving the very simple problems we have seen in previous videos!

 

With an average view time of: 8.46 minutes, I think my videos are too long?

 

We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, through argument and debate, but, most of all, freedom of will.

Ref: Stargate - The Ark of Truth - Alteran woman

 

I enjoy wise quotes...

Coming in video Seven, Asymmetrical Regauging:

 

On another note: over at one of the other forums we are seeing them copy our work to a tee, exactly, almost word for word. You can see here: I wish them luck, even though they are not giving anyone credit for the work they copy!

   Chris

Fighter posted this 4 weeks ago

Yep, they're talking directly about bucking-coils and I recognize a ZPM schematics there. It's funny how that guy "remembers" about a paper he "wrote" few years ago about bucking-coils. Sure, buddy, whatever you say... laughing

(link to larger image here)

And this guy Smudge reminds me of someone we had here who refused to share his work but was very ironic and acted like know-it-all, don't say who Sure buddy, you "did" a lot of research and put a lot of "effort" in renaming from "Romanian ZPM" to "Magnetic Delay Transformer", congrats ! laughing

(link to larger image here)

Let them copy, there is a higher-purpose in what we do here, don't care if these copycats give us credits or not...

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

@Fighter, 

My Friend, your'e right, there is a "Higher Purpose"!

 

@All Readers,

Asymmetrical Regauging is a CRITICAL aspect to Energy Generation, We always have a Regauge Period, then a Work Period. This is Critical, and also, this needs to be Asymmetrical!

 

 

I am thinking this video might be too early to share, perhaps we might not yet understand it. I feel previous Videos may not yet be understood properly?

In the following Video I show Asymmetrical Regauging: 10% On Time and 90% Off Time

 

 

This is it gals and guys, this is the Lollie!

IMPORTANT: Now, please understand, one can have Asymmetrical Regauging and still be Below-Unity! Some Fiddling is required! The Coils Slapping together Creates a Voltage, then the Current can be calculated: I = V / R

   Chris

Jagau posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi Chris


WOW I just watched your last video, impressive is the word.
I look forward to trying to reproduce that.

Thank you very interesting video

Jagau

Jagau posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi Chris
In order to replicate, in your last experiment i would like to know

if the output of your H-bridge is AC square wave or pulsed DC wave?

Jagau

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

Hey Jagau,

Just a single DC Pulse, 10% Duty Cycle of 3000 Cycles per Second.

Its very easy to replicate, only getting the Diodes in the right polarity is the important thing. Worth using a Re-settable Fuse just in-case.

 

What I have shown is just the start!

It is the beginning of a new world of Machines!

Patience and some very serious thinking will be required to further what I have shared. I know we here have all done the reading, got the background, we already understand what I have shared, we all know the importance and what exactly to look for! So, I am here, any questions please post here or PM Me.

I would prefer to keep technical questions here on this thread so they can help everyone!

My Friends, we begin! A journey to the future!

   Chris

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

My Friends,

An Asymmetrical System is critical to making this work!

I think we need to start thinking about the Magnetic Field, particularly the Magnetic A Vector Potential, or here, and how far past, what we think of as a Boundary, the Magnetic Field can really extend!

I posted HERE some information about this many yeas ago:

 

Does a Magnetic Field extend past the Repulsive Force of another? Where is it that interaction of Fields are Really Occurring?

 

What we see today, in Experiment, shows that more than one Magnetic Field can Propagate through a Core at any one time!

This is so very important!

   Chris

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

My Friends,

What we have learnt in this thread, and of course in preceding threads, here at aboveunity.com, give us the very basis of the future technologies to come! We are truly Light Years ahead of the other forums!

Other forums are actively coping our work!

The point of this post: Stick to Facts and hard data!

Soon, if not already in progress, we will see misleading information released by other prominent members of Other Forums! They will happily Mislead you if you let them! Don't let them!

We must turn a Symmetrical Transformer into an Asymmetrical Transformer!

 

Facts:

To make this work, all you need is:

  1. Three Coils, two can be used but this method is not my preferred method.
  2. Two Diodes.
  3. A Core that you have enough room to move the Coils around.

 

BS:

They may tell you that you need:

  • Magic Magnets.
  • Magic Diodes.
  • Magic Wire.
  • Magic Input.
  • Magic Core.
  • Magic touch...

 

Of course we all know what BS Stands for! Don't listen to them! Ignore everything except the facts I have laid out!

My Input is like so:

 

 

The Circuit in the Video:

 

Which is this:

 

 
This is the other Coil, some of the data is off screen:
 
 
This is Asymmetrical Regauging:

 
 
 

 

The Input was DC 12V @400ma. Above is the Output, some data off screen, my 10x probes are not enough to accurately grab all this data.

This is just a very simple, successful experiment! Andrey Melnichenko was right, but just had the implementation wrong in the pdf he shared. I have implemented: How to build your own Above Unity Machine using the knowledge I have gained in this Thread and others. This works as I have shared for many years!

Is science and the world going to move forward and learn from these simple experiments on this and other threads? I hope so!

I hope this helps! Its easy and Simple, no need for any complication!

   Chris

Jagau posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi Chris
The primary is L1
L2 is the small coil of 25 turns and it is on the primary L1
L3 is up, is it good?
Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Atti
Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi Jagau,

No, L1 is the Primary, this coil is approximately 25 turns.

L2 and L3 are both approximately 250 Turns, these are the Partnered Output Coils.

I hope this helps some wink

   Chris

Jagau posted this 4 weeks ago

Ok Chris
Well understood, thank you
On the site of metglass there is a document that will probably interest you
it's about handling and maintenance to avoid rust on this type of core.
Jagau

Attached Files

cd_sharp posted this 4 weeks ago

Guys, let's pay attention, 250 / 25 = 10. Duty cycle is 10 percents. Inductances ratio is very important in making them talk to each other. In my previous investigation, if the inductances are random values without an integer ratio between them, the current did not want to flow during the off time.

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
dewetw posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi,

 

I love the work that you guys do, but I don't always have the time to experiment myself. However, this time I did and I got the effect that you are talking about - the saw tooth. I played around with it lots and got mere perfect saw tooth on both output coils. Other setting made output coil 1 way deliver more than output coil 2 and I can also go slightly to the other side. I even got to settings where one output coil ramps up during the off part of the applied pulse.

Now, I never saw any result where I am getting more than about 0.82 COP. How important is the core material? - I am using a high frequency ferrite transformer core, N87 material I think. Output coils are about 35m of 0.5mm enamel copper wire each. Input coil is about 12m of the same wire to give that 1 to 3 ratio that you mention. I have played around with gaps between the core halves and even removing them altogether, one side and the other and both. Those cores stick together when in contact and powered up.

My driver is based on the CREE Wolfspeed and supplies a negative going pulse very efficiently. I can easily switch into the megahetz range while only costing about 15mA at 15V to drive the mosfet - I use ZXGD3005 after the mosfet driver to drive the gate even harder/more quickly, works beautiful. Shortest pulse I can generate is about 30nS. I am using non-inductive resistors as loads. Diodes: UF5405

Is there something I am missing?

What direction should I head in next?

Core material?

 

Coil setup:

 

Driver circuit:

 

Output coil 1 giving more then coil 2 giving more:

 

Some saw-tooth under different settings:

 

 

Thanks

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

Hey Dewetw,

Nice! Excellent documentation! Good images and also good textual description.

Let me ask you a question: In a single sentence, how would you explain the operation?

   Chris

dewetw posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi, I would say:

"The input pulse charges the electrical field in the coils and as it collapses magnetically so the coils oppose one another causing the current to flow longer."

 

I am close?

 

 

Chris posted this 4 weeks ago

Hi Dewetw,

I would say pretty close wink

The Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field of the Primary Coil ( 25 turns on mine ), Induces a Voltage ( V ), and because we have a Load, a Current ( I ) in one Secondary Coil.

The Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field ( Current ( I ) in this secondary ) creates a Voltage ( V ) in the Tertiary Coil and because we have Loaded Conditions, we have a Current ( I ). Both Secondary Currents Oppose each other, however one Current assists the Primary.

The time, I marked in the video @ 38 : 18:

 

Is Important! 

This is where the Input Coil can bring the two Output Coils to maximum Amplitude as quickly as possible! This means we must look for this optimum point, Magnetic Resonance. Magnetic Resonance, where each Coil's Current is 180 Degrees out of phase, like we saw in The Mr Preva Experiment.

This point is where the two Coils reach Maximum Amplitude in the shortest possible time, the slap together, we have no Impedance of the Coils!

Here is one Cycle, marked in Red:

You can see the Ramp Up, or the Slap Together, this is important, it must be short, fast and have a good amplitude.

Compare to Tom Bearden's Asymmetrical Regauging:

 

 

We see a match.

   Chris

Vidura posted this 4 weeks ago

Good experiment dewetw, as you asked for improvement I would suggest to reduce the primary turns and use a thicker wire gauge, so you can take better advantage of your fast Switching circuit, and get the voltage higher. Regards Vidura.

Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

My Friends,

I was hoping this thread would spur more work on. I get that everyone is busy these days, but it is work that must be done.

What I have shown is just the start wink

   Chris

cd_sharp posted this 3 weeks ago

Hey, man I put 15 minutes in it last night. No results so far. Stay tuned.

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

The evolution of the human race, is paramount! The first most important thing, over and above all else!

Some of the greatest minds have come and gone, left our small planet with tall dreams, giving the young hope and inspiration, these people have changed the world:

 

The problem is, there is far too much procrastination! To many do not believe in our future.

We humans, MUST start pushing greater boundaries. We must release the Limits we place on ourselves, and we must evolve.

Electrical Energy is at the forefront of our evolution! Manufacturing costs are detriment to Electrical Energy Costs.

We have some answers, we have already removed some Limits. Many breakthroughs have already been made. I cant do this by myself, I need you all to do it with me! To help me, to assist, to break through the Limits we must not let ourselves be bound to!

This and other threads here on this forum and material on my site: www.hyiq.org is here to help all.

Please, we must evolve! 

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

In the first post we saw this Image:

 

After a few experiments, we saw in Video Six, we got H1 + H2 = 0.

In Video Seven we changed the entire equation, we got exactly: H1 + H2 + H3 = H3.

As Tariel Kapanadze said, pointed out here, Andrey Melnichenko was on the right track:

 

@ 37 : 07 in video: www.youtube.com / watch?v=3utQUdGDMmU

From a computer has pulled out the information about such person... Its surname is Melnichenko. The unique person, unique material with which I have had time to familiarise for the last years, who decided exactly this question. It speaks: hold a resonance and all will turn out.

As he said, it has not reached transformer Tesla. and has already begun work, to make this installation. he will make this device, to my mind, still it is not fast, but... he is very close.

 

We have it my friends, we have it, all we need do is further it.

 

The future is ours! But only if we do this together.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Wistiti
  • Atti
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

A small review:

 

Many experiments shared, Seven Videos in total on this thread, one with a successful result. I need you all to help me do this, I cant do it for everyone else. 

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Another good video my friend

I can feel your concern and it is legitimate.
We are fortunate to have here a clean website with polite exchanges

and since I have been on this forum, I have made a lot of progress.

Thank you Chris for everything you bring us.

Jagau

cd_sharp posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey, man, I'm by your side, you know that.

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Jagau, CD, My Friends, Thank You!

   Chris

Vidura posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Chris, Sometimes I feel like you that there should be more responsive actions. But the universe has it's own timing, every now and then the things stuck and all seems to be difficult and all the efforts we put seems to be in vane. But then in the next moment everything changes, and without doing anything all begins to flow again . I know the effort you put to keep the forum running and sharing your experience. By the way i had a very busy time as well , so it was not possible to continue contributing . When ever I can i do it with all my love and dedication. So be patient my Friend, certainly all the efforts will bring their fruits on time, and it will help to make the world a better place. Vidura

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Vidura,

My Friend, you are very wise! I have said a few times now wink

Thank You!

 

@All I have a new video, just a look at what we got in Video Seven:

 

I hope this helps some!

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

A new video, one with a little history. Some close ups of scope shots.

 

I hope this helps some!

   Chris

Atti posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi.

 

 

This transformer is now wired in principle as Chris gave.

So below is the coil driven in the primary pulse with one of the secondary coils on it.
A second secondary coil is located at the top of the transformer.
The primary winding has 40 turns. The secondary windings are each 85 rpm. The windings on a standard transformer disk.

-The lower secondary coil is tightly coupled to the primary coil.
-The upper secondary coil is loosely coupled.

As far as I know, less voltage (power) is always induced on a loose coupling coil. (there only iron transmits flux power line, no coil flux)
In this video we can see that the right layout
(appropriate frequency and fill factor)
the bulb on the loose-coupled coil has more voltage than it should have. (I'm not saying extra power! For now.) Bulb performance is a major factor. Because the current is higher, so the flux change is greater.

So it is achievable that the secondary fluxes generated by the secondary help each other.

For now.

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Atti, excellent replication! Nice work!

A few things to think about:

  • The input Coil Turns and Wire Gauge.
    • The input Coil will create the Signal for the POC's to Interact Together at the best Frequency / Duty Cycle.
  • Coils Coupling Factor to each other.
    • As you pointed out, the location and so on can play a role. Also what Coil is doing what to the other Coil is important.

 

You've done a good job at getting Effects! Well done! This is only the start, this can lead to a much better machine.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi Atti

 I really appreciate your experiment

Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

In The Mr Preva Experiment, we learned the importance of Equal and Opposite Currents in the Coils. We defined this as Magnetic Resonance. 

Take our Partnered Output Coils, two Output Coils, opposing each other.

 

Our task: Bring these Coils into Magnetic Resonance.

Important: The Time Rate of Change one POC see's compared to the other, is Important, because E.M.F = -N dPhi/dt

POC2 sees POC1 as the Source, remember? So, the Time the Coil takes to Change its Magnetic Field, is important, very important. Because POC1's Magnetic Field, changing in Time, creates the Voltage, or E.M.F on POC2.

POC1 sees POC2 as the Source. So, the Time the Coil takes to Change its Magnetic Field, is important, very important. Because POC2's Magnetic Field, changing in Time, creates the Voltage, or E.M.F on POC1.

We have seen these potentials can be manipulated, tricked, but this is the basic rule.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi Chris

Resonant inductive coupling, 

another term that is apparent to magnetic resonance.


A very good article here from wikipedia explains it in another way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_inductive_coupling

Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Jagau,

Yes you're right, but a word of hesitation, the circuits / schematics on Wikipedia are far from what we are doing, although the idea is there.

From Don Smith:

 

He said the same thing as few times. Remembering Don Smith used Magnetic Resonance as Floyd Sweet did, the reason I use Magnetic Resonance.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

As you say Chris the schema is far from what we do, it was only to demonstrate where they are.

More often we heard MRI (imaging) or another NMR (nucelar) that refers to nuclear

.A lot of terms very confusing talking about magnetic resonance.


Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

I hate to say it, a day will come, when the young, that have this technology, know it, will say;

Those dumb bastards before us, they were so dumb they could not work this out!

They paid huge Electricity Bills, and Energy so is simple and so cheap.

 

They will coin us as the absolute dumbest, generation of all.

I already look back, I look at the very smart people I have come across, and think to myself, surely they must know and they are hiding it. Surely this super smart person is not that dumb...

Like I said, the US Military were testing the Hendershot Motor in the 20's:

 

I want the next generation to know I tried, to know I made a difference.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

First test of Chris replication.


 
I think it will be better when I finish making my H brige.
With only one mosfet that's what Iget

have try with a half bridge is already better, with full bridge mabe it willbe ok

 as youcan see with 11% DTC ,2.54khz withChris schematic

others Photo to come


Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Jagau,

Nice!

One Mosfet is all you need. Or Half Bridge, but remember, you need a path back to your Input supply. Power will come back through the input Coil.

Are you getting a nice Sawtooth waveform? Asymmetrical Regauging?

Very nice!

   Chris

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Yes i get a sawtooth waveform but at input coil.

What do you mean by return to input a diode maybe?

Jagau

 

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Jagau,

 

Yes i get a sawtooth waveform but at input coil.

 

Sounds like the Coils and the Diodes may not yet be correct. Sawtooth Waveform should be best on L3, with the Diode and current sense resistor.

The Sawtooth waveform is directly related to Lenz's Law and the Current that Follows.

I showed data on that in the thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT

 

What do you mean by return to input a diode maybe?

 

Yes, as long as there is a reverse path, a diode via Fet, D1 via Q1 or something, one can see the Input drop as one finds better and better results.

 

As you know, this is for others, as L1 sees a reverse EMF, Current will flow back to the 3V Source if there is a Diode, or internal Diode on the Fet. 

   Chris

Atti posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Jagau.

For resonant inductive coupling, review this information. Radio frequency duplexer.

Reflection factor I: U reflected / U inbound

the speed ratio is not 1: 1, but is closer to 1: 1√2.

Maybe it will help.

https://fizipedia.bme.hu/index.php/Nagyfrekvenci%C3%A1s_jelek_terjed%C3%A9s%C3%A9nek_fizikai_alapjai

Jagau posted this 2 weeks ago

Thank you Atti
I will read it carefully

@Chris

Indeed an inverted diode, corrected the error on L3
Others better photo to come

Okfor the input i understand what you mean.


Jagau

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

Remember, Don Smith, Floyd Sweet, many before us, the lessons they taught us: Use the Right Hand Grip Rule to see what Don is Saying!!!

 

Dont let this slip by, you may never get the chance again!

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

The input Coil:

I ask you, remember what we were told:

 

Remember what we found in the video series we have just gone through, we saw that the Change in Current is what produced an E.M.F, I have described this as Rise over Run, Tom Bearden describes it as Rise Time and Decay Time.

 

Why is this important?

E.M.F = -NdPhi/dt this is Electromagnetic Induction!

A very sharp Rise Time is the Change in Magnetic Field.

Our Partnered Output Coils is where the E.M.F is required.

I have provided an Electromagnetic induction Calculator:

 

I hope this helps some!

   Chris

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

A video to help explain the processes:

 

I hope this helps!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
Jagau posted this 1 weeks ago

Second trial   

 

           

The frequency is lower about 2.7khz and I am getting closer.  

Jagau

Chris posted this 1 weeks ago

My Friends,

A new video with some info:

 

Hope this helps!

   Chris

Members Online:

No one online at the moment

Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close