Current and Voltage Amplification key to Energy Machines

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 2.1K Views
  • Last Post 22 November 2018
Chris posted this 28 October 2018

My Friends,

A thread was posted: current amplifier as key to the free energy, one which we are very familiar with already!

It seems we have started a new push, an awakening, here in the West, where our Russian friends in the East, are a long way ahead of us!

It appears most of us understand the required principles, but most perhaps may not understand the putting into practice side of things.

 

A Reminder:

Current Amplification: Non-Inductive Winding at Resonance

 

Voltage Amplification: Standard Transformer Winding.

 

We can make the next Generations existence a comfortable one, we have the power to change the world forever!

   Chris

 

 

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 28 October 2018

My Friends,

The Mr Preva Experiment shows us how to Amplify Current, this is common knowledge to us now:

 

Floyd Sweet told us the same thing:

 

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right.

Current to the right is: I = da+ / dt + da- / dt.


Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

 

Now comes the next part, to amplify Current even further, Voltage must be Increased through Turns Step-Up.

Current ( I ) = Voltage ( V ) / Resistance ( R ), this is Ohms Law and it works all day long.

So, stepping the Voltage Up, and Non-Inductive Coil at Resonance, Magnetic Resonance, gives a Total Power Gain in Excess of the Power supplied to run the Device.

We have skeptics, and to be honest, really they mean nothing, but the people that can use their minds, use reason and logic, we have the evidence and the know how!

   Chris

Chris posted this 29 October 2018

Our Friends in the East continue to show us how to make these devices:

 

 

Links:

 

We have seen many machines run, many, perhaps if we look to our peers, we may just learn enough to be able to build our own.

Don Smith is perhaps one of the best resources we could have had. Others like Floyd Sweet, Ruslan, Akula and others have all been inspirations!

Very few have heeded the wisdom bestowed upon them from their Peers!

   Chris

Chris posted this 29 October 2018

My Friends,

We have seen this before, and it is ironic, Andrey Melnichenko told us some 10 years ago, the meaning of an image:

 

 

 

What's the meaning of this image? What's the purpose? It is simple when one takes a minute to really study:

 

 

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive and are Current Amplification Windings. L1 and L2 Inductive component is almost Zero.
  • L3 is Inductive and is a Voltage Amplification Winding.

 

We also saw the same meaning here:

 

 

 

Of course the switching component making it harder to understand. Tariel Kapanadze told us Andrey Melnichenko was right!

 

@ 37 : 07 in video: www.youtube.com / watch?v=3utQUdGDMmU

From a computer has pulled out the information about such person... Its surname is Melnichenko. The unique person, unique material with which I have had time to familiarise for the last years, who decided exactly this question. It speaks: hold a resonance and all will turn out.

As he said, it has not reached transformer Tesla. and has already begun work, to make this installation. he will make this device, to my mind, still it is not fast, but... he is very close.

 

We have covered this before. Now, I hope we have a much better understanding of what's being said here! We MUST Amplify both Voltage and also Current!

   Chris

 

Jagau posted this 30 October 2018

If I'm not mistaken a letter between 2 bars on each side, | H |
means the absolute value of the number without taking into account the sign + or -
And if this absolute number has a small arrow above, it means that it has a direction, a certain angle and a magnitude.
So | H1 | + | H2 | + | H3 | = | H3 | with each a small arrow above is an absolute number.

He could have written = | H4 | Why?


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 30 October 2018

Hey Jagau,

H3 is the resulting Field intensity and we cant change this. It is the Inductance that is resident in the Transformer arrangement:

 

 

 

 

The Current ( I ) and the Magnetic Field ( B or sometimes H ) are analogous to each other. One is the other. Indicated, all are equal to each other in the first bracketed Equation, then indication the H Vector of H1 and H2 are equal and opposite and thus cancel each other out leaving only H3.

 

 

Thus, the Magnetic Field H in this case, as there are three, we have an Action, a Reaction and also a Counter-Reaction, and thus a Asymmetrical, a Broken Symmetry, thus giving rise to open Systems, able to produce Energy Gains:

 

 

 

Current is Amplified and Voltage is also amplified in the same time frame. Don Smith also gave us the same information:

Please take a minute to watch and understand this short video

 

 

We see information that is standard Electromagnetic induction Laws, some 187 Years old. Still not fully understood today by Science.

 

 

If Q = XL/R and R is Zero, we have a large problem. We are not able to divide by Zero. Here we do see a Mathematical conundrum!

 

 

Resonance!

 

 

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive and are Current Amplification Windings. L1 and L2 Inductive component is almost Zero.
  • L3 is Inductive and is a Voltage Amplification Winding.

   Chris

Chris posted this 30 October 2018

My Friends,

We should consider a simple fact. Non-Inductive Coils, where the Turns are parallel and the wiring is equal and oppositely connected, thus giving very little to zero inductance, inherently is a NON Magnetically Coupled Device!

 

 

Meaning, a Transformer built on these principles would not work.

Non Inductive Coils, actually HIGHLY Inductive between each other, we have covered this before, can be Electrically Driven instead, or switched in at a specific Timing.

 

A common theme above, seen in many of the Russian Devices we have seen!

At Resonance, we get:

In the specific case of positive charges moving to the right and negative charges to the left, the effect of both actions is positive charge moving to the right.

Current to the right is: I = da+ / dt + da- / dt.


Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

 

So, Current ( I ), in this schematic, will only ever be the same, because Resistance ( R ) has not changed, only internal Circuit Resistance remains. Ohms Law: I = V / R. However, the equation f = 1/sqrt(LC) is offset by a larger than usual factor, not related to Zeta.

If the Resistance ( R ) were to change periodically, at one point in the Cycle, say a Diode, or a switch were activated, switching in Resistance, then Current Compensation would be required to keep the Resonant Circuit.

 

 

So, Non-Inductive Coils, are inherently Electrical in Nature, not Magnetic, however, we do know that there is a Magnetic Component, Equal and Opposite, this Is a "Generative" Resonance, using the currently un-understood Law's of Electromagnetic Induction. Some 187 Years Old  wink

   Chris

 

P.S: Ironically, the Human Race has highly trained engineers that can not grasp these simple concepts and apply then to Power Engineering. Why? They have not the will, trained to ignore the most important aspect of all of todays technology: Powering it!

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Deny
Chris posted this 31 October 2018

My Friends,

Effectively, we could view a Circuit of the above Bulgarian device like so:

 

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive and are Current Amplification Windings. L1 and L2 Inductive component is almost Zero.
  • L3 is Inductive and is a Voltage Amplification Winding.
  • LA1 is the +1000 Watts Load

 

I really should not "Simplify" Circuits, as I do not like the effects seen when one changes the original circuit without having a proper understanding.  Conceptually, we get the objective on this Thread!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 31 October 2018

Hi Chris

Talking about this document ''Transgeneratsiya''

quote:

At the interference maxima of the intensity of the resultant wave is greater than the intensity of the incident waves and the interference minima less than their sum. Under the intensity here refers to the energy of the electromagnetic field.

Common-mode interference of electromagnetic waves is a mode used to filter the interference of a signal
I try to understand with 3 coils in series he talks about Common mode who normally this type of mode is like this:

he probably mean in a 3 phase sytem?

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Jagau posted this 31 October 2018

Ok i  think  later in the document get my answerembarassed

quote:

waves are formed in different phases, where some are added, subtracted somewhere. Overall, therefore, these two effects cancel each other and the energy increment is not happening.  However, there is the so-called common-mode interference, in which occur only addition (in-phase) amplitudes of electromagnetic waves in the load. In this case the load generated by the additional energy in the form of heat or electricity

 

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 31 October 2018

Hey Jagau,

Excellent reference material and also excellent quotes/questions!

This is a real problem when an understanding is to be achieved! We see two issues:

  • The Magnetic Field ( B ) and the Electric Field ( E ), are Orthogonal to each other and technically 90 degrees out of Phase. I show Current as E, with no Phase difference, and not Voltage for simplicity.
  • It is not stated clearly, at any time, in most papers, which part of the Wave is a Standing Wave, Electric or Magnetic.

 

The answer is: Any wave form can be a Standing Wave! But for Energy "Generation" we MUST have opposing Magnetic Fields, thus creating a Standing Current Waveform, this, the Current Wave is at 90 degrees to the Magnetic Wave form:

I know you know all this, but for the other readers:

 

Electromagnetic Wave:

 

 

The Direction of the wave is in the direction of the Blue Arrow. The Wave Length is: λ = v / f - Where v is the speed of light in the medium one is using, and f is the Frequency.

 

Standing Wave:

 

 

Two Wave Forms, each in opposite Directions, shown by the Blue Arrows. In this case, equal in Amplitude. However we see the Current Waveform, depicted in Green as ( E ), has double the amplitude. This waveform is a Standing Wave, two Current Waveforms traveling in opposite Directions Summing.

The Wavelength for a standing wave is: 0.5 λ

Floyd Sweet told us:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.

A very interesting description by Wikipedia:

In one dimension, two waves with the same wavelength and amplitude, traveling in opposite directions will interfere and produce a standing wave or stationary wave. For example, a wave traveling to the right along a taut string held stationary at its right end will reflect back in the other direction along the string, and the two waves will superpose to produce a standing wave. To create a standing wave, the two oppositely directed waves must have the same amplitude and frequency. The phenomenon can be demonstrated mathematically by deriving the equation for the sum of two oppositely moving waves.

 

Please forgive my inaccurate depiction, but the following is supposed to show two waves equal, but travelling in opposite directions, the Arrows in the Current Waveform are in the same direction:

 

However, the Arrows in the Magnetic Waveform are in opposite Directions! 

Of course, the top and bottom waves in the above Image, when combined, create the wave below: A Standing Wave is the Current depicted in Green, which has double the Amplitude of each wave by itself.

 

 

So, the Current, because we know Standing Waves exist and we know how they are created, we know that this will Add, to create a Standing Wave.

Remembering, any wave can be made to be a Standing Wave, Magnetic, Water, Sound, light, hmm interesting...

We can build Noise Cancelling Headphones, but cant apply this Tech to Power?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 31 October 2018

Excellent discussion
I would invite everyone to join.
Could you tell me Chris from which document comes this quote?


Floyd Sweet told us:

If the directions of the two signals are such that H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remains above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to E.

This is the confirmation of what I was looking for. I would like to read the full document.

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 31 October 2018

Hey Jagau,

The above Floyd Sweet Quote is from: http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Nothing is Something.pdf

I have cataloged a large array of information on Inventors I think use the same or similar concepts: http://www.hyiq.org/Reference/

I also would encourage all members to join in, remember, NO-ONE gets trolled here! I crush Trolls!

   Chris

Chris posted this 31 October 2018

My Friends,

It should be noted, some of the worlds top engineers have been studding this field for decades!

They have no idea what we are talking about!

They have no idea How Energy is "Generated", they have no Idea what Energy is, all they know how to do is measure it.

I have said before, we are truly:

 

Light Years Ahead of the Other Forums!

 

We are Light Years ahead of standard Science. simply because Science has chosen to stay ignorant on a subject that it thought it knew all there was to know about it. A subject some 187 years old, that only until the 60's, some real advances were made in its understanding by Cohn and Feynman and a few others.

Humanity's greatest threat is its own self imposed ignorance!

A reason I have quoted my peers, those before me, simply is credibility. To show we are not the first like some people love to think, some love to discover new things already known by many before them and this is the greatest ignorance of all!

All Information, all the above videos have meaning, all Images have meaning, all paragraphs have a meaning! As we learn a little more, we gain general knowledge and we then gain power to use this knowledge! 

   Chris

Jagau posted this 02 November 2018

The reference section is really a source of  information.

A lot of inetresting suject.

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 02 November 2018

My Friends,

I track simple statistics. This thread is a statistic.

Most of the readers are not viewing reference material:

 

 

Currently we have: 183 Views

So, either most readers already know how these machines work, and are here to monitor our progress, or people just don't have the will and or time to learn.

Is there anything I can do to make this more interesting?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 02 November 2018

My Friends,

There is an element of understanding, required, not luck, to build these machines.

Not a single person identified the method of operation in Graham Gunderson's MIT, yet I did: 

By the way TK, Guess what Graham uses on his device: Partnered Output Coils


And, again, I show very clearly another device that uses the same concepts I have very clearly shown for many years.

Chris Sykes
hyiq.org

 

 

 

ref: https://overunity.com/16724/graham-gundersons-energy-conference-presentation-most-impressive-and-mysterious/msg488304/#msg488304

 

Not a single soul looked at the Coil Structure or the Interactions between the Coils until I pointed this simple fact out to people.

 

There is no Magic present in these machines!

 

Bucking Coils, I call them Partnered Output Coils "Generate" Electrical Energy! The Coils must be in Magnetic Resonance, and the Voltage must be high enough to exceed the Input, to be a Gain. Tinman's RT was the very basis of the Gunderson MIT, almost, to the day, a year apart.

 

Bradleys Circuit:

 

Ref: https://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg453963/#msg453963

 

Graham Gunderson's Circuit

 

 

Bradley Richard Atherton did a great job of his machine, however he has lost the ability to replicate, because he does not understand simple principles, for those that would like to view these events:

I have detailed here: The Importance of Documentation and Understanding!

Brad is a likeable fella, I do wish things had not played out as they did. 

I urge everyone, stick to Hard Fact! We have the evidence, we have the information. The ONLY thing needed is Understanding.

Note: Both machines have no sign of advancement.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • cd_sharp
Chris posted this 03 November 2018

Repost; Relevant for the above Images from Andrey Melnichenko

 

 

An Experiment worth doing, for the knowledge gained:

 

Inductance Experiment:

 

Temporarily connect the shortest paths to ground for each Coil as indicated.

Take an Inductance Meter, and measure the points indicated: L2 and L2 Gnd, record, and L1 and L2 and record.

 

Expected Results:

The Inductance Meter should give a greater Inductance Value for the XMM1 configuration compared to the XMM2 configuration.

This means, the Inductance is partially cancelled. The magnetic Fields will oppose for the most part for the equivalent lengths of L1 and L2. This is the Current Amplification component of the Energy Machine.

   Chris

 

NOTE: CD_Sharp has done this experiment and kindly shared the results. Thank You CD!

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
Vidura posted this 03 November 2018

Chris, totally agreed that only the understanding of the principles will make possible reproducable replication and further development of this devices . And one of the keys seems to be the noninductive coil, tesla stated that his bifiliar coil is a current amplifying coil(when connected the non inductive way), the hubbard device used non inductive coils, Figuera used them in primaries and part G . The opposed magnetic fields cancel and the E field doubles, the motional E field makes energy amplifying(or tapping)possible. And all the experiments performed by our members add some knowledge and better understanding of this ignored aspects of science and make the research more interesting. Therefore it has to be remarked the importance of experimenting and sharing.

Chris posted this 06 November 2018

Hey Vidura,

I believed this thread would have cleared up much confusion. There are answers in this thread that some, no doubt,  have sort after for quite sometime.

Its often the simplest thing, the simplest answer to the most complex problem. The inductance Experiment will help greatly in understanding.

   Chris

 

Chris posted this 06 November 2018

My Friends,

It should be considered, the spatial coordinate of Partnered Output Coils, where each Coil is located and the way, or the Direction of the Windings, for some may be difficult to grasp:

 

 

Fig: One

 

 

 

Fig: Two

The two Coils are identical except for the spatial coordinates of the Coils. In the top image, if the second winding, to the right, were wound on top of the winding on the Left, the two coils, Fig one and Fig Two, would be identical.

The Coils Buck, they are Magnetically Opposing each other, and we know this "Generates" excess Current ( I ) but only when the Coils are in Magnetic Resonance.

I hope this is something to think about for others here.  Again, we have seen this for quite sometime, many different people have given this to us:

 

Floyd Sweet

 

The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitudes.

As polarity may be maintained constant, that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process.

It’s obvious, we have a self-regulation machine whose inherent conservation to the nth degree.

 

 

Ref: Floyd Sweet

 

Andrey Melnichenko

 

 

Tariel Kapanadze

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

Don Smith

 

 

It must BURN the Trolls that used to Troll me, to know I am right, to know I bought the Light, where there was only darkness, where the so called Educated ones Dwelled... Light Up The Darkness!

 

Where:

  • L1 and L2 are Non Inductive and are Current Amplification Windings. L1 and L2 Inductive component is almost Zero.
  • L3 is Inductive and is a Voltage Amplification Winding.
  • LA1 is the +1000 Watts Load

 

And many other examples exist.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Wistiti
Show More Posts
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Advertise here:

Your 233 x 233 image

Content is screened.

Negotiable price.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
Close