Non inductive coil experiment replication

  • 241 Views
  • Last Post 10 minutes ago
cd_sharp posted this 6 days ago

Hey, guys

We all know this experiment is an achievement of great importance. I start to replicate it here:

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
cd_sharp posted this 6 days ago

The currents are the pink (L2) and yellow(L3) traces. The dark blue trace is the input signal with the probe ground disconnected. That's why it looks so weird.

L2 field decays and causes EM induction in L3. Then L3 decays and causes EM induction in L2.

I'll be back.

PS

Notice the power supply and switch from Vidura. Fantastic tools! I've never used anything like them.

Chris posted this 6 days ago

Hey CD,

You have already seen what we are talking about here.

All you need do is work on the effect, get it to work longer over a greater off time.

You truly need to concentrate on that effect, you had it there, 

   Chris

cd_sharp posted this 4 days ago

Hey, man, I understand, asymmetrical regauging on both traces.

Let's see some more results from fiddling:

I have more results coming soon.

Also, notice I'm not using the ATX supply for powering the power switch any more. It introduces a lot of noise on the oscilloscope traces. Plain old batteries are cheap and keep the traces clean.

cd_sharp posted this 4 days ago

Hey, guys

Latest results:

Chris posted this 3 days ago

Hey CD,

Awesome! Excellent replication! EVERYTHING I see is Good! Little bit of interference, perhaps switching harmonics or something? But wave shape is all good!

Learn as much as you can with this CD. Excellent work!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
  • Vidura
cd_sharp posted this 3 days ago

Hey, man, the interference is because I use the 5v output of my linear power supply for feeding the power module while the main output of the power supply feeds L1. If I use batteries for the power module, the interference drops. I ran out of batteries for the moment. Question: we see current flowing in both POCs during the off time and the diode in series with L2 is getting hot; why is the bulb not at maximum? In fact, I replaced the bulb with a 5/20w, 12v and it lights up very weakly. Next up, we must see what the output voltage is and how we can increase it.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 3 days ago

Hey CD,

the interference is because I use the 5v output of my linear power supply for feeding the power module while the main output of the power supply feeds L1. If I use batteries for the power module, the interference drops. I ran out of batteries for the moment.

 

If I may suggest a few reasonable sized Caps on the output of your Power Supply and a small one, say 5000uf or so and a 100nf or so, it may remove the Noise. Something like this:

It looks to me that the Fet may actually be triggering, turning on, during these harmonics? Possibly? If so, increasing your input.

 

Question: we see current flowing in both POCs during the off time and the diode in series with L2 is getting hot; why is the bulb not at maximum? In fact, I replaced the bulb with a 5/20w, 12v and it lights up very weakly.

 

Yes both POC's must carry a current, and the Currents / Magnetic Fields, must oppose. The Diode is effectively a very low Resistance uni-directional Load. Current can only travel in one way and when it does, the Energy Transformation is converted to Heat as you know.

Both POC's have low to zero Impedance during the On Time.

Not so at Off Time.

Impedance ( Z ) is what gives us a slower decay in Magnetic Fields. This is the Power "Generational" Phase, if you like. Output when no input is on, a disconnected Input from the System.

With too much Impedance, Power is reduced. However, I = V / R, so our Output Current ( I ) is directly proportional to the Output Voltage ( V ) and the Output Resistance ( R ). This you already know, you pointed out here:

 

Next up, we must see what the output voltage is and how we can increase it.

 

The Voltage ( V ) gained during the Input Phase, On Time ( tOn ), linearly decays over Time ( t ), so the average Voltage ( VAverage ), will be approximately: VMAX / 2 over the duration. Roughly.

 

 

So our Maximum Voltage is not the Voltage we see over time, that our Load see's over the duration.

Capacitors on the Output is an option, to smooth the Output over time. Similar to your noise problem above. Realistically, increasing the Voltage Potential, getting the Potential up higher, faster, over a shorter tON period. This gives us a greater Average Output Voltage, and thus an Output Current.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Fighter
  • cd_sharp
cd_sharp posted this yesterday

Hey, Chris

I'll try all the things above, thanks.

Here is my latest progress taking you advice into account:

cd_sharp posted this 18 hours ago

Hey guys,

The above experiment flattens the output voltage, which may affect the time when the POCs interract. Here is the proof:

Chris posted this 18 hours ago

CD Excellent work!

The Input Coil is the Signal Coil, its what brings the Output Coils into Resonance. The Length of the Coil, Wire Gauge, Frequency and Duty Cycle are all important.

If we took 2x Coils, in front of us. These Coils need the same Magnetic Resonance as The Mr Preva Experiment.

We must find the ideal drive method.

A Coil must be selected that can drive the input Frequency and Duty Cycle at the maximum efficiency.

Sometimes reducing the Turns, reducing the Duty Cycle and adjusting Frequency to suit, will be an option for increasing the Output. Finding where the Output Voltage reaches the highest point.

Excellent work my friend!  wink

   Chris

cd_sharp posted this 10 minutes ago

Hey, man

I'll take each and every advice into consideration.

I'm taking small steps, not to miss something important.

Let's see when is the output voltage raising and what's causing it to increase. I'm using the MATH A-B function of the 'scope:

Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close