Akoteles Research on Partnered Output Coils

  • 207 Views
  • Last Post 2 weeks ago
akoteles posted this 27 March 2024

Hi guys, Chris,

I'm preparing to setup my bench in order to replicate the Chris's BEMF charge pump. I wanted to ask you guys if the windings really need to be perfect? also did anyone try Bifilar on either the primary or secondary or both?

Thanks and sorry for being a newbie Alex

Alex

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
akoteles posted this 5 weeks ago

I'm so sorry for highjacking the discussion. admin please delete my posts, keep the thread clean. alex

Alex

Chris posted this 5 weeks ago

Hello Akoteles,

I recommend to stick to what we have already shared, there is a massive amount of information, its very simple, and its very cheap to make some progress.

Don't let your mind over complicate this very simple subject! This is where most people come unstuck! Its not hard, its very easy, its just an understanding that's all!

Please follow the very basic instructions I have already given:

 Start Here → Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines

 

This is your thread, if you need changes, please let me know! I hope you can show us how well you're doing in time!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

akoteles posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey guys,

a quick update from my side, I've managed to replicate the effect but only with 220v 3.2W G9 LED bulbs ( so far ).
POC 1 and 2 both have the same bulbs and indeed as ⚡Chris⚡ said, one of the POC's won't see any additional load on the source.🍾🍻🥃

Setup:

AC plug-in power meter 

12V DC power supply 

DC-DC Buck converter so that I can raise or lower the input VDC with ease, currently staying fixed to 12VDC input because I'm getting scary outputs between 100 and 500 VAC depending on the Mosfet Gate frequency.

-> Thinking of swapping the buck converter with a buck-boost DC-DC converter, not sure yet...

N-type Mosfet

  • IRFP450LC
  • driven by a SQW signal generator with 50 Ohm resistor on the Gate terminal

Diode:

  • HUR60120PT ( need help here )

Core:

  • Metglas Proterial AMCC0125

 

Load:    2x 220v 3.2W G9 LED bulbs

POC1:           210~230 turns of 1.0mm Copper enameled wire ~1.1 Ohm ( this is the standalone coil )

POC2:           230~240 turns of 1.0mm Copper enameled wire ~1.2 Ohm

L1 Input coil: 34 turns of 1.8mm Copper enameled wire


Signal generator:

  • SQW , between 150hz and 400Hz
  • Duty <50%
  • Rise 10V
  • Fall 0V


When I connect the load on POC1 then I notice the ~3Watt increase on the Power meter

Then  I connect the secondary LED bulb on POC2 and I notice NO wattage increase on the Power meter, I also tested with a second identical one also, just to be sure

 

So far so good... 🥳

Now the interesting find... at least for me, I found out that the POC1 and 2 generate a higher frequency / ocsillations.
For example, I'm pulsing L1 input coil at 100Hz and yet the POC's generate 200Hz output... perhaps it's because of the additive waves like Chris showed us.
Once I start loading them , then the oscillations rise to kHz, wonder why is that ?

As for the Help I've raised with regards to the Diodes , I tried it so far with ordinary ones, schottky, ultra fast diodes, full bridge rectifiers and also an Ultrafast SOT-227 Dual diode / Parallel diode: VS-HFA140FA120... Nothing seemed to work.
Basically I wanted to rectify the output of one of the POC's so that I can loop it or run some DC bulbs.

Pictures will follow once I clean it up a bit and I actually manage to run some resistive loads.

Thanks a lot for all your support!
Alex 

Alex

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Augenblick
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hi Alex,

As you state, and perhaps an easier way to think of Partnered Output Coils, is each Coil, one would represent the Rotor Coil, and one the Stator Coil in an Electric Generator, here we have Symmetry, if we have only these two coils, and we know, all Symmetrical Machines are always Below Unity!

The Magnetic Vector equation would be: M.M.FL1 + M.M.FL2 = Zero

The Symmetry voids any Energy Gain, simply because: Output = Input - Losses.

However, we have a single Input Coil, a Third Coil, this brings Asymmetry to a typically Symmetrical System. 

The Magnetic Vector equation would be: M.M.FL1 + M.M.FL2 + M.M.FL3 = M.M.FL3

Asymmetry allows for Energy Gain, because we have a Hole in Science, where the System can allow for an extra source on Energy Input. This is how Nature works.

Appendix 1: The Discovery of Parity Nonconservation

 

Let us consider first an episode in which the relation between theory and experiment was clear and straightforward. This was a “crucial” experiment, one that decided unequivocally between two competing theories, or classes of theory. The episode was that of the discovery that parity, mirror-reflection symmetry or left-right symmetry, is not conserved in the weak interactions. (For details of this episode see Franklin (1986, Ch. 1)). Parity conservation was a well-established and strongly-believed principle of physics. As students of introductory physics learn, if we wish to determine the magnetic force between two currents we first determine the direction of the magnetic field due to the first current, and then determine the force exerted on the second current by that field. We use two Right-Hand Rules. We get exactly the same answer, however, if we use two Left-Hand Rules, This is left-right symmetry, or parity conservation, in electromagnetism.

 

In the early 1950s physicists were faced with a problem known as the “τ -- θ” puzzle. Based on one set of criteria, that of mass and lifetime, two elementary particles (the tau and the theta) appeared to be the same, whereas on another set of criteria, that of spin and intrinsic parity, they appeared to be different. T.D. Lee and C.N. Yang (1956) realized that the problem would be solved, and that the two particles would be different decay modes of the same particle, if parity were not conserved in the decay of the particles, a weak interaction. They examined the evidence for parity conservation and found, to their surprise, that although there was strong evidence that parity was conserved in the strong (nuclear) and electromagnetic interactions, there was, in fact, no supporting evidence that it was conserved in the weak interaction. It had never been tested.

Figure 1

 

Figure 1. Nuclear spin and momentum of the decay electron in decay in both real space and in mirror space.

Lee and Yang suggested several experiments that would test their hypothesis that parity was not conserved in the weak interactions. One was the decay of oriented nuclei (Figure 1). Consider a collection of radioactive nuclei, all of whose spins point in the same direction. Suppose also that the electron given off in the radioactive decay of the nucleus is always emitted in a direction opposite to the spin of the nucleus In the mirror the electron is emitted in the same direction as the spin. The mirror image of the decay is different from the real decay. This would violate parity conservation, or mirror symmetry. Parity would be conserved only if, in the decay of a collection of nuclei, equal numbers of electrons were emitted in both directions. This was the experimental test performed by C.S. Wu and her collaborators (1957). They aligned Cobalt60 nuclei and counted the number of decay electrons in the two directions, along the nuclear spin and opposite to the spin. Their results are shown in Figure 2 and indicate clearly that more electrons are emitted opposite to the spin than along the spin. Parity is not conserved.

Figure 2

 

Figure 2. Relative counting rates for particles from the decay of oriented 60Co nuclei for different nuclear orientations (field directions). There is a clear asymmetry with more particles being emitted opposite to the spin direction. From Wu et al. (1957).

Two other experiments, reported at the same time, on the sequential decay pi meson decays to mu meson decays to electron also showed parity nonconservation (Friedman and Telegdi 1957; Garwin, Lederman and Weinrich 1957). These three experiments decided between two classes of theories--that is, between those theories that conserve parity and those that do not. They refuted the theories in which parity was conserved and supported or confirmed those in which it wasn’t. These experiments also demonstrated that charge conjugation, or particle-antiparticle, symmetry was violated in the weak interactions and called for a new theory of decay and the weak interactions. It is fair to say that when a physicist learned the results of these experiments they were convinced that parity was not conserved in the weak interactions.

 

This Article Reference is Here.

The Definition of Non-Conservation:

a situation in which the total value of a physical quantity such as energy or mass does not remain the same: The article examines the non-conservation of energy in the radium experiments of Marie Curie. We also discussed one other unexplained effect: the non-conservation of mass.

 

Nothing difficult here, it is very easy science to understand, but it seems, the Clowns over on the other forums, cant navigate their way out of a simple paper bag!

In reading just this sentence:

These experiments also demonstrated that charge conjugation, or particle-antiparticle, symmetry was violated in the weak interactions and called for a new theory of decay and the weak interactions.

 

Who comes to mind? Tom Bearden maybe? He was right, he just confused much of it, sadly...

The door is the Magnetic Field, and the incorporation of Asymmetrical Systems, because Symmetrical Systems can not hold promise for our future! We MUST be smarter and build Asymmetrical Systems, like I have given you all. Excess Energy comes when you open the Door on Asymmetrical Systems.

The poorly educated fools, that have spent their entire lives memorizing a few textbooks, they have wasted their time! They can not be helped, because they simply can not think for themselves! We must focus on the minds of the real Explorers in our Species, those ready to explore the edge of Science and beyond!

Best Wishes,

   Chris

We're Light Years Ahead!
Members Online:

No one online at the moment


What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close