• Important: Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils

Important: Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • Topic Is Locked
  • 16K Views
  • Last Post 24 February 2024
Chris posted this 11 March 2019

My Friends,

The Effects of Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils is important. What is Delayed Conduction? What is the point of this?

Delayed Conduction is specifically to get the Voltage on the Terminals of your Partnered Output Coils as high as possible in reason! Its the change in Magnetic Field that Creates Voltage, its the Opposition of Magnetic Fields that Pumps Current! 

Circuitry can also be employed to delay Conduction on the second Partnered Output Coil.

Ref: How to build your own Above Unity Machine

 

I gave an example of Delayed Conduction here.

As you can see, the Mosfets will only conduct when the Zener Diodes Conduct, this is rated to 18 Volts.

This means, the ends of the Partnered Output Coils must be at least 18 Volts, before the Coils can power any load!

We have seen this before! This is not new to those that have done the Study!

 

 

The MEG Demo Circuit

Where D2 represents a Bi-Directional TVS.

 

Ref: JLN MEG Replication

 

Ref: The MEG Team Data.

Where the Top Trace represents the Input Channels, and the bottom Trace Magnetic Resonance in the Output Coils, seen as Asymmetrical Regauging.

 

NOTE: JLN used a MOV in his MEG Replication. A MOV has similar Voltage to Current Characteristics! 

 

Ref: JonRB

 

 

Ref: Renesas Datasheet

 

 
Ref: The MOV or Varistor V I Characteristics

 

 

 

I want to stress the point of getting the Voltage on the Terminals of your Partnered Output Coils to a maximum without being disturbed. Input Creates a Voltage on your Terminals, then the Input is switched off. Then your Partnered Output Coils Conduct and we Pump Current.

Remember: Some of these Circuits may require an Earth Ground.

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 27 March 2019

CD Awesome Work!

   Chris

Chris posted this 28 March 2019

Hey CD,

The Time required for the Zener Break Over Voltage is the only time you need Secondary Voltage, Induced from the Input, at the Cathode of the Zener and Drain of the Mosfet. Remember the Diagram shown, Asymmetrical Regauging:

 

 

We Regauge the System, short timed Input, enough for the System to reset and become able to do Work again. The Input is only required for a short time to start the machine off.

This means, any time the System has Input that is not doing anything, the Input is best turned off. Requiring Frequency adjustment and short Duty Cycle. This should decrease the Input to the minimum amount needed.

Apologies, this seems a bit too obvious. However a requirement to explain.

Getting the Mosfet to turn on and off properly requires a little work, getting enough Voltage and Current on the Specified Output Coil.

Perhaps we could start a Thread on this?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • cd_sharp
Vidura posted this 29 March 2019

Here I post an additional test, I have modified the windings as per Chris' suggestion, primary on the central leg 12 turns, outer legs 36 turns each CW-CCW. Also I have modified the delayswitch as following. the idea is that the 100nf cap charges at the breakdown of the zener and keep the mosfet on until the voltage reverses and resets at the breakdown of the second zener(5.1V)

It seems to work, although the current on the negative halfwave is much smaller than the positive, but with some more adjustments it should work as expected.The setup with a resonant tankcircuit and halfbridge:

and the scopeshot:

Upper trace current, zero is at the second graticulate line from aboth, the voltage zeroline at the middle of the screen.

 

Chris posted this 29 March 2019

Hey Vidura,

Excellent Experiment! Nice!

For the moment, remove one of the Delayed Switch's, Just keep one in there. So a simple Circuit like so:

 

 

Where the Zener Diode ( D1 ) is a Delayed Conduction Switch. This setup will enable you to find the best Resonant Point of your Coils. When found, the machine will vibrate and hum like Crazy.

The Resonant Frequency might be low!

The Resonant Frequency may only require 10% or less duty Cycle!

The Input may only need to be 5 Volts.

   Chris 

 

P.S: The Mosfet will need a Pull Down Resistor in order to turn it off properly when it needs to.

P.P.S: I started a Mosfet Turn On and Off Thread here: On and Off, Conduction in a Mosfet

Vidura posted this 29 March 2019

Hey Chris, I will test this version of the circuit, one coil would be shortened by the timing device, quite interesting. Note that this switch only work properly with AC, as the reversal is needed to turn off the gate, I will post the results regarding this at the MOSFET switching thread later. Also I'm using an analogue oscillator with 50%duty fixed for the moment, although I started to build a new one with two phase pwm and analogue duty cycle timing, which will be more effective. For the moment I am using what I have at hand. regards Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 06 April 2019

My Friends,

I want to throw you a Ball...

Three Coils, as we have been looking at for some 9+ Years now. One Input Coil, two Output Coils, Partnered Output Coils seen here:

 

 

A Step Up Transformer to some people. But, we are not using this arrangement Symmetrically! We are using Asymmetrical Regauging, the Potential Gained, the Voltage Gained, a Dipole if you like. 

 

 

Every Coil will have a Potential Difference on the Coils, this is Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction. Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field.

If we use a TVS, a Transient Voltage Suppressor, which has a diagram like so:

 

A Very Simple Device, which looks like this in the real world:

 

 

The stripe above indicating a DC, or a single Polarity, Uni-Directional device, the TVS without a Stripe indicating an AC Device, or a Bi-Directional Device, can be used in both Polarity's.

  • So what would we do, how would we use this device?
  • What would this device do?
  • How does it work?

 

NOTE: An extra Diode may be required in reverse to the TVS.

 

We have a specific Pulse into the Mosfet, it is controlled specifically, we Push Input into the Core, it costs us a little, BUT, then we have a Controlled Switch, the TVS Conducts... The TVS becomes a Switch at the specific rated Voltage. A Switch...

Why do we need to have the TVS Conduct?

We must support the Current, as we now have a Potential on the Coils, as soon as the TVS Conducts, we have switched off our Input.

Remember the VI Curve above?

We have Conduction, at the point where we have VC the Clamping Voltage, the Conduction.

This means, we have one Coil Shorted. The Second Coil has a Maximum Magnetic Field, it must return to equilibrium, to Zero State, this action, of falling to Zero State is the Neo Magnet Falling through the Tube:

 

This creates the Triangle Wave we have seen:

 

 

Ref: The MEG Team Data.

 

Where the Top Trace represents the Input Channels, and the bottom Trace Magnetic Resonance in the Output Coils, seen as Asymmetrical Regauging.

Please remember the Name of this Thread: Delayed Conduction in Bucking Coils 

We are delaying the Conduction, enough to make MMF React back on itself, the second Output Coil. All we are doing is bringing up the Potential on the Terminals.

   Chris

Chris posted this 07 April 2019

My Friends,

A video to further explain the Importance of this thread:

 

I hope this helps!

   Chris

mrblobby posted this 07 April 2019

Absolutely love this series of videos you've been putting together Chris. I really appreciate all the time it must take to put them together. It really helps to explain more comprehensively the principles at work for people like myself. 2 thumbs up.

Jagau posted this 07 April 2019

Another great Chris video


I agree with you mrblobby


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Hopeful1 posted this 09 April 2019

Thank you Chris. A fantastic post. It has made  lot of things a lot clearer for me. I totally agree with mrblobby.

Tony

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Atti posted this 09 April 2019

Hey man.

 

Quiet enough. There are a lot of readers, but there are few experiments.
  Maybe I don't care anybody?

Do you care about some other than some?

With a few thoughts I break this silence.

It belongs to an older project, but now it was taken back.
I adapted it to MrPreva layout.

This is the secondary switch. The name is strange because the real secondary coupling is the two 220-volt bulb.

The theoretical drawing is shown here.

The base frequency is set by excitation and the secondary frequency is a separate but tuned frequency. Here, too, we play the secondary current.
You don't have to wait for miracles, but it is very important to look at the effect!
Wide range of values can be set.
-When it takes up a lot of power from the power supply and delivers little power.
-When it takes up little power but gives off a lot of voltage.
-When it delivers high power with little power.

Not only the frequency, but the filling factor is also very important! About 25-35% is the right value. At least for this layout.
These data are for information only.
Correctness would also include correct measurement.

Over time this will happen.

 

Chris posted this 10 April 2019

@Atti - Awesome! Very nice!

 

My Friends,

Another video, this time a lot more detail on some things:

 

Apologies everyone. I was referencing a very good video, giving full credit, but YouTube wont allow me to use it for Educational purposes at all.

The video was:

 

Now, isn't this just stupid! I can play the video here, on this page, but cant reference it under the Educational Copyright laws.

I hope this helps some, it took forever to make this. smile

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 11 April 2019

Hi Guys, == ive only been at this a few weeks,  - and im not working with reasonant tank circuits yet,-

infact not even as sine waves, -   currently i am rectifying the ac, into half waves, and bucking them around in various ways,

i have seen triangle like waves, and duplicates of many peoples results, - -  i think i have all the skills and tools too make this

happen, at least in a simple manifestation. - but my problem is the inherent weakness of home made transformers, - or even modified ones, -....  my first iron core hacked MOT was 20% efficent, run conventionally, - and then 35, , now im nearly at 50.  - but any further improvement is getting more difficult. - ...   hopfully soon , i will have a free energy demonstrator that is 90% efficent.,

it should be noted, that ive done many ferrite transformers before, and they crack 90-140% efficient without any hassle, - at least from my experience,  -  here is what im working with.

 

currently my trigger system, is a simple adjustable opamp driven from a seperate psu, with a C3998 transistor chopping the wave into a globe, - i am already see'ing efficency gains, which is great, - i think this will work,  - but i need too get my transformer builds in order.

 

Jagau posted this 12 April 2019

Hi Chris

your noises will start increasing and it's quite an exciting effect you know it's quite exciting to see you know you're sort of seeing a machine that you've brought to life if you like it's really interesting it's really cool    

  I like these words
Your analogy with 2 wire in parallel is very well explained and I think I have understood the message.   Jagau  

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Chris posted this 12 April 2019

Hey Guys,

Thanks for the positive comments! I am so happy this is helping others!

The Timing, the area in which the Two Output Coils Act and React with each other is the Trigger, the Catalyst for the door to open to Electrical Energy Gains, well Above the Unity Factor, well above your Input.

Magnetic Interactions, A Solid State "Generator", an Electromagnetic Pump, we simply Accelerate Electrons.

To see this:

 

Very simple, viewing the Current in the two Partnered Output Coils is key to moving forward. Most of you will have seen my Measurement Blocks before:

 

The Currents are critical to view, the Currents are the Electromagnetic Wave and together they give you the Electromagnetic Field Interactions.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Jagau
Atti posted this 12 April 2019

Patrik1

 

it should be noted, that ive done many ferrite transformers before, and they crack 90-140% efficient without any hassle

 

-What means?
- What layout?
- How did you measure it?

 

 hopfully soon , i will have a free energy demonstrator that is 90% efficent.,

 

If you have free energy then just 90% efficiency?

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
patrick1 posted this 12 April 2019

hehe in relation too my testing of bemf characteristics in ferrites, - i setup a very basic thus simple experiment -consisting of a factory wound small ferrite transformer from the junk pile, (many infact), and got many positive results.  -   so basically what i did, was too setup a bucking converter from my very low duty cycle generator, - work out the rise time, of the transformer via the scope, so i could opporate the ferrite transformer at maximum conventional efficency, and capture the bemf from the input.   . using a common input cap, and output cap, ( too eliminate any meter errors ) .  and simply switched the caps when they had run down, - 

needless too say, i was shocked by the results. - clear energy gains.   and no witchcraft. .....         all done specifically too be efficient and eliminate error and loss's ,  - obvious methodology.         ..... and same results, with like 3 of 5 tranformers. (.  the ones that didnt work, i suspect, was due too obvious factors) , core material or windings being used out of spec / understandings... * ... 

btw 4007 diodes and soldered joints, mostly.  ;-D.  really not nasa style anything....     but it didnt take it any further, - 130-140% is marginal . - but.  if i ever hire somebody into developing coding, i will try again. with auto cap dumping, and somthing more efficent than a 555timer / stacked cd4017's.  

 

(il try to keep this tread too bucking coils only, -  since that is what i am working on (peers left at newman motor builds) - they are fun !  youtube /watch?v=sJ3zjje8hgw

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Vidura posted this 12 April 2019

Hi patrick1 and welcome on the best forum, it's good to see new active members always. I have heard about some dc-dc converters of the shelf that seems to be slightly above unity efficiency, although I could not verify this by myself. With130%+ it should be possible to self sustain the circuit with a feedback loop, which is the best proof, as measured values can be tricky sometimes. Regarding the MOT device be aware that these are designed to run at full load, respectively regulated on the primary, so if changes on the load conditions are made they are prone to become very inefficient if using the original primary winding. Good luck with your experiences. Vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Jagau posted this 12 April 2019

he Chris

 

The Currents are critical to view, the Currents are the Electromagnetic Wave and together they give you the Electromagnetic Field Interactions.

 

Yes i think so measurements must be carefully checked

 other researchers noted the same thing

JLN quote

Clearly there are fileds present in bucking coils

 

Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Atti posted this 12 April 2019

 

patrik1

You can declare anything. Can you show it 130-140%? hehe

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Atti posted this 12 April 2019

Hi Vidura.
You know very well that it is difficult to prove the efficiency of units over 100%.
As you recommend:
-It should be self-propelled
-or DC input DC output measurement
Everything else deceives you.
You say well, this is a good forum. Thanks for sharing. Everyone has contributed.
(I measured myself like that, but I didn't set up such a good theory as Chris or others)
However, I still can't see any of the correct measurements taken by anyone.

The answers are usually always:
Here is the drawing and the theory, work for it.
(but we know well, can say anything)

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
patrick1 posted this 12 April 2019

Hehe I CAN DECLARE, that it is possible i am wrong with my results, - however, i did bother too test the idea... ** ;-D

is that i wanted too rule it out, as being impossible, or and see'ing how close i can get too 100% with my current skills and equipment, which is all very humble....   and try again in some years, ,  so naturally, getting well over unity. was quite surprising,

i recall the experiment a little, actually im still using the same crusty digital scope as i type this reply.,, one cap on the input, - and 2 output caps, -   and if you count the energy left in the input cap, at the time the transistor stopped conducting, it was over cop1.4  ... tried plenty of transformers, (and base resistors....)...  just couldnt make the problem go away......

 

thx for the welcome. and i look forward too posting more about my bucking replication.

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Chris posted this 15 April 2019

My Friends,

Simple things, think simple, preventing complication, things we must do!

Two Wires, one switch, I have provided a simple diagram for such switching, a simple light dimmer circuit, a Triac with a Diac, a Resistor, a pot and a cap:

Ref: https://www.ecnmag.com/

A simple circuit to switch in the second Partnered Output Coil can make these machines work as I have said:

 

Its all there, in what I believe to be its simplest form. Study specifically the Magnetic Field Interactions! I wish I could do more to help!

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 15 April 2019

OH Chris, Its all There buddy,  - but is it back too front, too make me think back too front ? ;-D      hysterical. 

I had some success 45 mins ago. and filmed it. , - it may even be over unity, but not by much....  ignore the smoking primary. ;-D

and critically.

 

yours sincerely,

BRO

Chris posted this 15 April 2019

Hey Patrick,

Thanks for sharing your experiments! Awesome work!

I recommend measuring the Output Currents on the scope. I mentioned in this Post.

This is an important step in understanding your machine. Its important that you don't get a Ground Loop, so using the diagram I provided will help. Select the same terminal on the Partnered Output Coils.

You should get the same results, as The Mr Preva Experiment, less the Sinusoidal waveform of course.

Nice work and thanks for sharing!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Jagau
patrick1 posted this 16 April 2019

Thnx for the suggestion, - i measured the output currents, and was not supprised by the results... ** .. Still Trying too improve this transformer, -  its about 40% efficient with the bucking coils, and about 93% without.

so far i have managed too determine that i was bullshit lucky with my 93% test, in choosing loads for my hacked MOT.

and that my POC's are demonstrating the principle. which i am slowly coming too understand.... i will be aiming for high voltage outputs like JLN , and not something in the range of 1ohm like many others, seems easier for me.... i am in the process of testing my previous POC transformers too determine if they are less woeful. -  many of the ferrite attempts are excellent as conventional transformers... gotta get my head out of the fruit bowl

Chris posted this 16 April 2019

Thanks Patrock!

Thanks for sharing. Lots of work gone into diagrams and so on!

Top scope shot is Output Currents? Across 1 Ohm Resistor? Second two are Voltage? Try flipping One Partnered Output Coil's Terminals over.

There are elements in your wave shapes that are correct.

There is a little fiddling!

Can you adjust input Frequency or are you mains locked?

For some insight, have a look at the Above-Unity Tag.

   Chris

Chris posted this 17 April 2019

 

 

My Friends,

Some points I would like to point out, from my last videos:

 

Partnered Output Coils:

 

How the Coils might be placed:

 

  1.  The Primary Coil has a Changing Current, thus a Changing Magnetic Field, which Induces a Voltage on the Secondary.
  2. The Secondary's Voltage will have a Current that is also Changing in Time if a Resistive Load is placed on the Coil.
  3. The Third Coil, the second Partnered Output Coil can be Switched in accordingly, with the detected Voltage on 2.
  4. The Rate, or Timing, in Time of the Switching in, can be adjusted to where the Effects we have described, are seen.
  5. A tunning or adjustment of Frequency and Duty Cycle along with the timing of the switch is important.

 

The difference in Conductivity between the Two Partnered Output Coils creates Magnetic Resonance!

You will see a Triangle Waveform as I have described, when you find Magnetic Resonance.

   Chris

patrick1 posted this 17 April 2019

laughs out loud .  well done chris, i came on tonight too check for updates, - & apologize for my over sized images, and fix it.

little did i expect you too summarize your work, in the best fassion i have ever read. ... and i have read what must be a hundred pages, you have written, and several hours of video, - .. and more amazingly, i have managed those feats in about 4 hours flat. - so my next step, is too rush a little less.

 

peace.

. also i will share my work with the newman motor as it goes on, - i think results of cop 1 > 10 > 100, depends on how much mechanical output you want, is enough too turn anyones crank. 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 17 April 2019

My Friends,

I want to share some thoughts I have shared with a Friend wink

 

There is a theme I am trying to share:

 

Any Output Coil with a Resistive Load will have a Phase Angle between the Voltage and Current very close to Zero Degrees. So as long as the Output Coil sees a Resistive Load, then there is no difference between Voltage or Current Controlled Switches.

However, we do often have a Capacitor on the Output, remembering this is used to smooth the Output, this is not a Resonant LC Tank.

The Circuits that can be used are endless, the configurations many, but the ideas that must be followed are very specific.

The basic idea is as follows:

 

 

The Timing of the switch is a factor to be learned for the machine you are building. Input, try what ever you find easiest until you get the best Output.

 

As an example:

The MEG Team used this Circuit:

 

 

Where D2 is a TVS - Voltage Controlled Switch.

With this basic arrangement:

From my early MEG work this version not published until only a few years ago.

 

With this Output Data:

 

I believe the Data is inverted on one or both Axis.

Question: What's required to make The MEG Work?

Answer:

  • Input Voltage Adjustment.
  • Input Frequency Adjustment.
  • Input Duty Cycle Adjustment.

Ask yourself, what happens when the TVS Conducts? L3 is short-circuited right? Maximum Current Flows, and What's this Maximum Current doing to the other Coils? "Generating" Voltages, and also because the other Coils have Loads, they also have a Current, they will be equal and opposite in time when the machine is tuned correctly, we end up with The Mr Preva Experiment Magnetic Resonance. 

We Catch the Wave, we see Magnetic Field interactions within the Machine, that act upon themselves in such a manner to Resonate between themselves.

Its in the way we have been bought up to think, I am sure there is a way of thinking, we have been taught to think in such a way, that does not allow us to see some of these simple things.

   Chris

Chris posted this 18 April 2019

Hey CD,

Of course, all this depends entirely on the machine and the Circuits used on the Output.

I want to direct this example to The MEG, in honour of Tom Bearden's life's work. Lets listen very carefully to the video of Lee Kenny and Steve Patrick:

 

The words:

We couldn't directly connect a load to the Input Coils, that we were not activating, however we were able to place a device called a Transorber across the Coil, this aloud us to measure part of the power in this Coil.

Ref: @15 : 44 The MEG Demo

 

Lets ask the Question: Why couldn't they directly connect a load to the Input Coils, that we were not activating?

Because of Lenz's law? Because if there is no Delayed Conduction, they Get no Magnetic Resonance and the Machine does not go Above Unity? Yes...

We know, from two sources and also from Experiment, that this is a very simple Circuit:

 

The MEG Demo Circuit

 

Where D2 represents a Bi-Directional TVS.

 

The MEG Team gave us their Input to Output Data:

 

 

I guess what I am trying to say, is the Machine will be different depending on your Build.

Smoothing Caps are often used, and Circuits can be employed to detect Voltage levels before they reach Cap Voltage, but after that, then it gets difficult.

What I recommend is follow the outlines given, study hard those before us.

I have placed huge amounts of information in the References Library! learn from them, learn from Experiment, follow the basic outline I have tried to lay out.

Remember, the Switch will be mostly on! Its a short switch in at the right time when the Coils start to have a Voltage.

   Chris

Jagau posted this 18 April 2019

Hi Chris

A strong point in the MEG Team video is when it states this:

I inserted a pulse I would get a pulse in and when I dropped that pulse I would
get a second one in other words I would get two outputs for every one input

Very interesting indeed

Jagau

Chris posted this 18 April 2019

Hey Jagau,

Fantastic point, and we know why wink. Floyd Sweet told us almost the same thing:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to E.

Ref: Nothing  is Something by Floyd Sweet

 

This is Partnered Output Coils, its how they work, Equal and Opposite, Experiment shows us Current Doubles wink. Voltage costs us nothing. So yes, its a requirement, we must get two outputs from one input.

All we have to do is find the right combination of ingredients to make our Pie.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
Vidura posted this 19 April 2019

This frequency doubling is also seen on the Markov transformer, in the patent is stated that it ocurres only with iron cores, not with ferrite, the same is said about the Paraformer.

vidura

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Jagau posted this 19 April 2019

 

Listen to your voice how you grumble and when.

I do not grumble,  I see what is said in the video meg team. 

It is probably a bad translation from you 

Jagu

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Atti posted this 20 April 2019

Jagau!

You're not grumbling!
The translation was really misinterpreted.
I apologize for that.

 

I think I'll miss out on those comments afterwards. More good work for everyone.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Jagau
Jagau posted this 20 April 2019

Do not worry, it's forgiving


I would like to be able to appreciate your video that we can translate the word

we do not have access to the translator of utube

maybe Chris could tell you how to do thank


Jagau...

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 23 April 2019

My Friends,

We say when its very quiet: Crickets...

I expect many are attempting very simple experiments, in delaying the conduction of the Second Partnered Output Coil. Very simple Circuits can be employed, or even geometry's.

After all, a very short delay on the Black Wire, the Second Partnered Output Coil:

 

 

Could create a very large gain if it is timed right:

 

Wow, a Symphony! 

   Chris

 

P.S: I have built a Database, it has every post ever Posted, on all the Forums on the internet related with Energy. I have AI scanning the texts now, looking for anomaly's in relationships and actions. A record has been laid out, we have tech now that will identify those not working for the Good Side! 

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 23 April 2019

A lot of Easter time visits are now over.
As I am waiting for parts for another project, I have decided to build this kind of circuit that you propose.

I have almost all the pieces except the core. I have one in ferrite that works up to 80 Khz in old TV monitors.
As you seem to have already done the MEG do you think I will have good results with this ferrite instead of the honeywell AMCC320?


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 23 April 2019

Hey Jagau,

I have built many devices, and yes I started The MEG Project back on 17 June 2009. This was my first MEG:

 

This was my second MEG, which was more successful:

 

 

My big MEG was just too big and heavy to work with. Too hard to change turns and so on.

I have replicated most of the machines from those before me, Melenchenko, Akula, and so on, some successful some not. I blame my failed results on my lack of knowledge, not the machine itself.

Right now we have something we have never had before! We have a baseline Guide on how to achieve an Above Unity Machine! My pages give this to you!

No-one else has ever provided this Free to Humanity!

   Chris

Jagau posted this 23 April 2019

I built what could be called a MINI-MEG, in order to check what this type of circuit can give and then produce a more efficient one, so I'm on my first try and I'm already surprised by the results I will soon share some pictures
Thank you Chris you are our inspiration and a huge source of information.


Jagau

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 24 April 2019

My Friends,

If I may re-iterate requirements, Three Coils, one Input Coil, Two Output Coils, make them Buck, one way is Delayed Conduction on one Coil, this makes the Two Output Coils buck.

This thread, and the thread: Parallel Wire or Bifilar Coil Experiment and How to build your own Above Unity Machine. 

Please, this information will give you access to Energy Machines!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Aetherholic
  • Vidura
patrick1 posted this 24 April 2019

I have decided that my original approach is no good Chris. - please let me add my thoughts, and correct me if i am wrong.

My replications of delay effect, - have been all on mains AC. - with iron cores, - now i do see results, but never OU.(which is unusual for me).  - because in the case of this delay effect @ 50hz, - the magnetic resonance is contingent on the parameters of the core.,  thus, - what is not possible @ 50hz, may be excellent @ 250hz.   ,  so it will not always be possible too acheive a good outcome with a random core.... @ 50 hz, -   . so instead of trying largers cores, - i have followed your advise, and downloaded a sine wave generator for my laptop, and am using an high power, audio amplifier too drive my primary, -   will share my latest attempt in short order.

 

Chris posted this 24 April 2019

Hey Patrick and All,

You need:

 

Of course this is outlined in several posts already in other threads. But for new readers, I have posted again. You will also need some time and patience to find the point where this Magnetic Resonance can be found.

If you use the tag: Above-Unity, some more information can be gleamed.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Wistiti
Forelle posted this 25 April 2019

Hi everyone, Can anyone tell me in which range the frequency and dutycycle has to be to reach magnetic resonance , for example if it is around 500hz could it be that at 499 hz nothing happens and at 500hz you would reach it and the dutycycle lets say is at 10% and nothing happens and at 11% you would reach it. Thank you and a good day.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 25 April 2019

Hi Forelle
A short pdf that will answer many of your questions.
Jagau

Attached Files

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Chris posted this 25 April 2019

For All,

Magnetic Resonance, is where the Coils have Equal and Opposite Currents, 180 degrees apart.

 

 

The Currents are produced by the sudden switching in of the Second Partnered output Coil, Delayed Conduction:

 

 

Could create a very large gain if it is timed right:

 

 

In The MEG, One Coils sees a sudden Conduction, because a Transient Voltage Suppressor is placed directly across it, the Other coil has a small load, maybe a 1 watt globe, so the Circuit for The MEG looks like this:

 

The MEG Demo Circuit

 

 

Where D2 represents a Bi-Directional TVS.

 

The MEG Team gave us their Input to Output Data:

 

 

So, Magnetic Resonance is where the two Partnered Output Coils have Maximum Reactions, where the Electromagnetic Waves between each Coil Slap Together very hard, exactly as shown by the Ocean Waves in the above video, and they create a Sawtooth Waveform. A small Input triggers a Large Output.

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Scalarwave
Forelle posted this 25 April 2019

Hi Chris,

you did not understand my question,maybe i have formulated it wrong,lets consider you have everything right,i would like to know if for example a device from you where you have magnetic resonance and you found it at 500hz how narrow are the steps which you are dialing,what i mean would it resonate at 499hz also?I think i understand most of what you told us,i know when you have a device which resonates at 100khz and you are 1hz of that it doesnt matter.Actually i know most of the most important Threads parrotlike(in my language).Thats one reason i do not like to post much because it is many times hard for me in english,for this post i write about 20 minutes).If you want please delete your last post,maybe it proves that i really do not understand what is going on,but i dont think socool.

Jagau thanks for the pdf.

Thank you Chris.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Forelle posted this 25 April 2019

I have thought about my question and i have to excuse me because it is a complete nonsens,two times.embarassedI try onesmore and so it is much shorter ,is it best to have exactly the 180° or is it better a little of?I hope you dont mean i am a troll.If you want i can delete the other posts.

 

Chris posted this 25 April 2019

Oh I am sorry Forelle,

Frequency Steps: 1-5Hz approximately, you will know when you're heading into it. Especially at low frequencies.

The Resonance determines the Phase, which is very hard to observer in Pulsed DC Systems. AC is easier. But harder to work with.

I will re-word my last post, it may be helpful for others.

I am sorry for miss understanding your post.

   Chris

 

Topic Is Locked

We're Light Years Ahead!
Our Above Unity Machines:

Asymmetrical EMI

Wistiti's Bucking Joule Thief
Non-Inductive Coil Experiment
CD's Non-Inductive Coil Rep
Baerndorfer's Experiment
Captainloz's A-R-E
Aetherholic's COP>4.0

Resonant EMI

Yo's Ferro Resonance
Jagau's Non-linear Resonance
Ferrite at work
Recomended Protocol:
Measurement
Switching System
Measurement Block
Current Observation
Current Sensing Resolution
Members Online:
What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Start Here:
Help with using the Forum.
Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Browse by Category:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close