Electrical Energy

  • Poll
  • Last Post 29 November 2017
I do NOT understand where Electrical Energy comes from.
1 Votes
I do understand where Electrical Energy comes from.
2 Votes
I think I know where Electrical Energy comes from.
6 Votes
Chris posted this 24 April 2017

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason; it has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. - Nikola Tesla "Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency" (February 1892)

Many Generations have passed, and many generations have been successfully held back from the potential they deserve! Many reasons have held Humanity back, Greed, Dogma, Selfishness and the list goes on... However, this post is about Electrical Energy...


  • Liked by
  • Charles
  • Vasile
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 24 April 2017

Electrical Energy is Charge and the Movement of it, as was pointed out, the definition for Kinetic Energy is:

Energy which a body possesses by virtue of being in motion.

A simple piece of matter or mass, say a Copper Wire is full of Electrical Energy, Randomly Distributed Charge, or at least on our scale, Charged Particles are moving at huge velocity's on the Atomic Scale, all Randomly with no Uniformity with respect to each other.

An Electrical "Generator" works in such a fashion as to bring Uniformity to the Motion of these Charged Particles, Electrons, Ions and Protons.

An Insulated piece of Copper Wire can be thought of as a wave guide!

As the Magnetic Field moves perpendicular to the piece of Copper Wire, the Charges are separated, pushed to the ends of the piece of Copper wire like as is shown in the following Video:


The Magnetic Field is the Prime Mover, it is the Catalyst for the Separation of Charged Particles, and the Velocity of the Magnetic Field is the Work done.

All Systems have losses! All Systems will exhibit desire to move back to Equilibrium or absolute Zero. However, all Systems that have a close relationship to Inverse Square Law Forces, can be manipulated into a situation where the very Force that's they work on, can be used to Excite the System even further!

A Transformer is under Unity, the Losses vary from around 20% to 1%.

The Magnetic Field we pay for in Watts on the Input, becomes the Output less the Losses... But we can setup a situation where the Magnetic Field can be used to invoke Electromagnetic Induction many times more than once! What does this mean? A quote from an old hand:

The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitude.


As polarity may be maintained constant , that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, and at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process. It’s obvious; we have a self-regulating machine whose inherent magnetic properties will provide energy conversion conservation to the Nth degree.

I have read this passage many times and it gleems more beauty every time I read it!

It is for this reason we see many Transformer Variants coming forward as Over Unity Devices! Because with some modifications to a simple transformer, we can do exactly this, Invoke Electromagnetic Induction more than once! With this said, the more Current we draw the more Magnetic Field the transformer will have to carry and as a result, the more Charged Particles will be Separated from Source - Matter.

Chris posted this 24 April 2017

Today I watched a video I saw a long time ago, it had subtitles this time around - Please take the time to watch this video and study what is being said:


The Names used by Tariel Kapanadze, the information he gives and the credit to those before him he gives! This is where the Secret is! We all have had the answers for a long time!

Chris posted this 06 May 2017

Hi Everyone - I have continued this topic on my site: Electrical Energy - What is it?

If anyone would like to do the same, let me know!



Chris posted this 07 May 2017

Hi Everyone,

I have written a new Article: Magnetic Modulation of Charged Particles

If you have any ideas, or thoughts, let me know!


Zanzal posted this 24 May 2017

Hey Chris,

I once thought there was this mysterious type of electricity called "static" electricity. I asked a friend who was knowledgeable in electrical engineering and electronics what they thought about it and they did not think static electricity was the same as normal electricity.

So I performed an experiment to test this theory. Taking cheap little Wimshurst toy I purchased, I removed the HV capacitors and attached a ceramic cap to each terminal with clip leads and added two LEDs in opposite directions connecting each of the two capacitors together. Essentially instead of a HV load like an x-ray tube and HV caps, I used a conventional load with conventional caps. The LEDs would flash a bit as I turned the crank. In hindsight the results are not so mysterious, but it is interesting looking back how little I understood. To think I might still spout off some nonsense about static electricity being special had I not taken the time to test my idea before.

Hopefully my tale here gives you some ideas. I have a small obsession with electrostatic induction and I have often wondered if our abandoning this technology was premature. There is no Lenz law to fight in the world of electrostatic induction.


  • Liked by
  • Fighter
  • Chris
Chris posted this 27 May 2017

Welcome Zanzal - Thanks for sharing your experiment. In my understanding of Electro-Statics, if a Static Difference in Charge is obtained by rubbing a Plastic Comb over a Woollen Jumper, then by definition we have a Static Difference in Charge:

electrostatic charge - the electric charge at rest on the surface of an insulated body (which establishes and adjacent electrostatic field)

↔electric charge, charge - the quantity of unbalanced electricity in a body (either positive or negative) and construed as an excess or deficiency of electrons; "the battery needed a fresh charge"

An understanding of Electro-Statics is sometimes a fine line we can cross depending on view point. One quote I know of:

William J Hooper also talked about a similar thing. I think Electro-Statics is important, we don't fully understand it. There are areas of interest. I will leave you with another quote:

 It is critical, the very simple process of Charge Separation. T.H. Moray wrote about it, all inventors have, Clemente Figuera, it was the Primary Concern for them! It has been studied in depth by many, but not understood by many more!


  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
  • alohalaoha
Chris posted this 28 May 2017

My Friend and Member, Wistiti has shared the attached document. It is a very good read! Very good!

Thank You Wistiti!


Attached Files

Chris posted this 16 August 2017

I would really like to remind everyone, Electromagnetic Induction...

Very simple, a Magnetic Field moving at 90 Degrees to a Wire "Generates" Electrical Energy!

Transformer Induction, the Magnetic A Vector Potential, moving on a Transformer Core, "Generates" Electrical Energy!

We want to capitalise on  "Generating" Electrical Energy!

It can be done more than Once in a System, Asymmetrical Induction Cycles! Remember what we learned in the Parametric Excitations of Electric Oscillations Thread?

We don't want to mess with the Red, Electric Part, we loose Energy there, we want to "Generate" more Energy in the Green, Magnetic section, where we can act like a Generator, when we don't affect the Input.

Remember the Mr Preva Experiment, Electromagnetic Induction I its primary Function. It "Generates" Excess Current! But it has to be in Resonance!

Please always think Electromagnetic Induction, Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field!


  • Liked by
  • Vasile
  • alohalaoha
Vasile posted this 16 August 2017

Even though I do not 100% resonate with your last post what brings to mind is the mechanism of a coil moving past a magnet.When the coil is shorcircuited and aproaching the magnet, a magnetic field that opposes the magnet will build up in the coil and when the coil leaves the magnet a magnetic field that atracts to the magnet will build in the coil.So we can profit from this observations?How?




  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 16 August 2017

Hey Vasile - Yes, "shortcircuited" or Loaded, Output, this is an Equal and Opposite effect - Lenz's Law.

As you point out, upon leaving the pole piece, the sine reverses, Opposing the Action trying to pull the Rotor back in.


Note: my above diagram is in a LC Resonant System, there are two areas, two different forms of Energy doing Work at different times.






All this is very well known. It is this we need to utilise! Like I said, we can have Electromagnetic Indction occurring more than once is a System!


Show More Posts