Floyd Sweet VTA - Analogy of Above Unity Results

• Topic Is Sticky
• 518 Views
• Last Post 19 June 2020
Chris posted this 09 June 2020

My Friends,

Floyd Sweet gave us the following Analogy of how his Machine worked:

An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:

Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship.

The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity.

This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat’s displacement of the medium, water.

Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction. Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless.

In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine hp would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect.

This is reactive power – no work is done.

The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship.

The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.

In the case of the Space Flux Coupled machine, there is no visible entity. It’s abstract. A steady state coherent force is present when brought under the influence of the electromagnetic controllable forces. It returns to an incoherent state when the initiating magnetic forces are absent (except in the case of a permanent magnet).

Ironically, the very next paragraph is:

The feedback loop: Previously mentioned, you will more clearly see how the loop functions at the time you see the physical construction of the stationary armature of stator assembly.

The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases.

Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges.

Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

An illustration will help to clarify how the feedback principal counters the magnetic force binding the electrons in orbits, restraining them from motion as charged particles in the form of an electric current.

Some time back, I explained to CD, that once this Analogy was understood, the building Above Unity machines would be very much easier. Well this is true, from a perspective that properly understands the Analogy!

Lets Deduce this using Forces:

1. fairly strong tidal flow of the Stream or River.
2. paddle wheel driven by an Engine that is 80% Efficient.
3. mass of the Ship in the Water of the Stream or River.

Interestingly, 80% is approximately Transformer Efficiency! Now, the statement:

If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity.

Floyd Sweet is telling us, Greater then Unity, this is achievable, but what has to occur for this to happen?

Floyd Sweet said: "tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship", this means that, 1: The Tidal Flow Force Integrates, is summed with, +, or Addition, with the Engine's efficiency driving the Paddle Wheel:

Floyd Sweet is specifically talking about the Engine Efficiency: 80% and getting that: 80% over 100%, greater than Unity!

To do this, Floyd tells us, an Extra Force, Adds to the 80%, is Integrated to the 80%, this Force is the Tidal Force, pushing on Mass of the Ship, doing Down Stream or River.

We already know, if one looks at the M.M.F as 1 Unit: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1. Now normally, without the extra force, the equation would be: 1 + -1 = 0.

So by having this extra force, we have the ability to get the System up and over %100 Efficiency, a Greater than Unity System, or as we here at Aboveunity.com know, an Above unity System!

You will note, Floyd Sweet does not specify the Magnets in the Analogy! Remember what he had to say here:

Assume a load on the machine draws a measured current of 1.0A at a terminal voltage of 240 V. At a power factor of unity, the current and voltage are in phase. The power output is in watts and √3EI (1.732)(240)(1.0) 415.68 watts. The current is sensed by conventional current transformers having a 1:1 ratio, rectified by a three phase full wave bridge. This D.C. output is applied to a current winding closely coupled to the power-phase windings, but isolated to a degree that prevents transformer action from including voltage in the D.C. winding. This winding produces a magnetic field that varies in intensity as the square of the load current on a 1:1 isolation ratio. This is the same magnitude as the load current peak value. The D.C. flux varies as the square of the current and not sinusoidally as does the voltage and current of the power phase windings, with proper capacitors across the D.C. control voltage. The D.C. flux remains constant sustaining a constant flux during Δt. The flux produced by the moving charges comprising the load current goes through zero, thus the complimentary flux, that is integrated with the coherent flux, aiding the cross flux between the attracting magnets. Thus the system is self-regulating. As the load current increases, the complimentary flux adds to the cross flux. The voltage output remains constant. The primary limiting factor is the cross sectional area of the phase winding conductor.

You can see, there is an effort to preserve the Output Voltage: "The voltage output remains constant". This as we all know, is a problem we have faced already and solved in my experiments: Non-Inductive Coil Experiment.

This does show an integration with the DC Magnets Flux, notice DC Flux, again making the Magnet Conditioning idea look foolish! This, showing the possibility of the magnets adding Energy to the System.

The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.24 1018 electrons / second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes.

Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field. Thus a conductor that formerly had a temperature rise above ambient labelled as a factor of 10 would now operate at a temperature of 1.0. Thus the same gauge wire would carry 10 times more current at the same temperature.

This line of thinking is amazing to read! It is an amazing accomplishment! Now, remember, this is The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator, but Floyd Sweet said:

The underlying principles are the same.

...

The defining equations are similar to those of the dynamic Space Flux Coupled alternator.

Again, no conditioning:

The magnets producing coherent quantizing of the incoherent quanta packets comprising the surrounding space field, providing a continuous stream of energy from an infinite source.

Magnet Conditioning is foolish, it just is! It is a hoax, a red herring to throw others off the truth!

Best wishes, stay safe and well,

Chris

Chris posted this 10 June 2020

My Friends,

We are all familiar with the basics of Electromagnetic induction and its siblings, Self Induction and Mutual Induction:

The Change of the Magnetic Field, key word Change, as the Magnetic Field is Changing in Time, that is when the Voltage is being "Generated"! As soon as the Change stops, no more Voltage is "Generated"!

Now, Floyd Sweet made a very important statement:

An illustration will help to clarify how the feedback principal counters the magnetic force binding the electrons in orbits, restraining them from motion as charged particles in the form of an electric current.

Important: I urge all here, read this 20 times or more, this is a profound statement, eye opening, very much more than that! Connecting the dots on this simple sentence, then we have all the answers you could possibly need! This sentence is directly after: "The feedback loop", sentence:

The feedback loop: Previously mentioned, you will more clearly see how the loop functions at the time you see the physical construction of the stationary armature of stator assembly. The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons.

Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

I have said before, it is the Opposition of Magnetic Fields that Pumps Current, so we have a direct confirmation!. Why? Because the Electrons are being freed from their orbits, pushed up to a higher Orbital until they become Free Electrons!

Floyd Sweets way of thinking is awesome! He was literally a genius!

Again, making the "Conditioning" ideas and theories look just foolish! Just stupid!

Really studding the papers, and Floyd Sweets background, Floyd Sweet truly focused on the Charge inside the Insulated Copper Wire, its a fact and cannot be disputed!

The Insulated Copper Wire and the Changing Magnetic Fields are your Battery! Its evident, the store house of Energy, in the form of Charge, we need not convert it to another form, is already filling the Copper Atom and if there are billions of Atoms, then there are many billions of Electrons! 29 x Atoms! Because the Copper Atom has 29 Electrons, each Atom. It also has 29 Protons, they must balance out:

There are still those out there that are actively misleading others! So I urge you all, be careful what you read, what you hear, always Check and Cross check all information, even mine! Go read the documentation! See for yourself I am giving you much more than something to read!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

Chris

P.S: We here at Aboveunity.com have experimentally proven and verified these theories, they are factual and experimentally proven! We have the Technology, while others still have their Eyes Closed!

Jagau posted this 10 June 2020

Excellent post Chris,

I think we are on the right track and things are becoming more and more clear to me.

Jagau

Chris posted this 11 June 2020

My Friends,

@Jagau - Thank You My Friend!

@All,

I want to quote again, because this is relevant only if you know the background:

The mole (symbol: mol) is the unit of measurement for amount of substance in the International System of Units (SI).

Why is a mole 6.022 x1023?

The number 6.02214076×1023 (the Avogadro number) was chosen so that the mass of one mole of a chemical compound, in grams, is numerically equal (for all practical purposes) to the average mass of one molecule of the compound, in daltons.

Ref: Wikipedia Mol

Now, if we want to work out the Electrons in a Mass of Copper:

We work out the molar quantity.......and get 6.022 × 1022 copper atoms..............

Explanation:
From your Periodic Table we learn that one mole of copper, 6.022 × 1023 individual copper atoms have a mass of 63.55⋅g.

And thus we use the MASS of a chemical sample to calculate the NUMBER of atoms and molecules. This is the principle of chemical equivalence, and you will do many of these calculations over the next few years......

Given that we know that if there are 63.55⋅g copper there are NA, Avogadro's number of copper atoms.........we take the quotient.....

Every excellent piece of information, deserves credit! Nice bit of info there! There you have it, the Copper Atom has 6.022 x 1023 x 29 = 17463800000000000000000000 Electrons for every 63.55 grams of Copper.

``````double Ampere = 6.24 * Math.Pow(10, 18);
double Electrons = 6.022 * Math.Pow(10, 23) * 29;
string Answer = String.Format("{0:00}", Electrons / Ampere);``````

If my Math is correct, in 63.55.g of Copper, there is: 2,798,686.00 Amperes available if we could remove all of this Charge in 1 Second! WOW!

Remember, Floyd Sweet said:

To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

To affect conversion, meaning the change of the Copper Atom by stripping off its Electrons, would need Magnetic Forces approaching Infinity.

WOW What a Battery!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 12 June 2020

My Friends,

Floyd Sweet gave us a very specific set of definitions for the Construction of his Vacuum Triode Amplifier:

FIELD SUPER-POSITION AND THE VACUUM TRIODE

Electromagnetic induction with no measurable magnetic field is not new. It is well known that in the space surrounding a properly wound toroidal coil there is no magnetic field. This is due to the superposition of the fields. However, when alternating current is surging through a transformer an electric field surrounds it. When we apply the principle of superposition to the vacuum triode it becomes more obvious how the device is in fact operating.

The principle of superposition states that; "In order to calculate the resultant intensity of superimposed fields, each field must be dealt with individually as though the other were not present". The resultant is obtained by vector addition of each field considered singularly.

Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils...

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule.

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Expressed mathematically: E = (B x V ) + ( -B x -V ) = 2 ( B x V )

This very specific detail on the Construction, is directly, only several sentences after this sentence:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to E.

Now you will remember me also quoting Ruslan Kulabuhov:

All these systems operate on the basis of standing and traveling waves. It is necessary first to catch the motion of particles in the coil.

I want to share a little more info on this, from Ruslan:

The English Transcription here:

and Oleg hello here look here such here
diagrams to you should have that moment
when you tune a standing wave here
when you deploy it
it should be like this just like that
you can get
then what do you need if you twist it she
will swim like this
Makarom
nothing else, if I am changing now
generator frequency before that is see
now 32 kilohertz now see
I will change, I will decrease, and although
no, I’ll leave what I had now
there 32 yes that is, here we reduce the voltage
see what happens all the effects
Now yes, that is, it is practically absent
then that is the effect they are almost
so weak, weak but on certain
frequencies it will be strong yes that is it
I’m telling you once, look, look here.
quite imperceptibly if you twist it well
almost this standing wave no yes here it is
and then something is dancing this garbage
tension raised a little
nothing yes that is no effect
raise about and go all go now
reflected wave here it is yes that is but
she is shifted a little bit to do so
so that it is not displaced yes that is, here
look here we adjust the frequency to such
degrees to stop
that is, it should be clearly well, at least
more or less to get
this is the main point that should
be he now if so look she
here it is 180 degrees to a turn and here
that is, she turns over here
now now if it's all stick together
together there will be such a picture here
she runs
that’s what I can say the moment when
here the blow is an impulse here to this place
somewhere here right here at this moment goes
and as they say goes the same current
which we need here we need to achieve
if you do not achieve that is
it turns out if he
for example a twisting statue
there is the edge of a normal sine wave
nothing special is formed here yes
Now I’ll untwist them stronger here she is
ordinary sine wave chose nothing
the usual
and she, as it were, has nothing underneath
no tone especially nothing happens
the one who loves is popping twitches
there is no standing wave
standing wave it is usually in such
Now I’ll show you how Cyril
hi, in general, in short
achieve such a picture flooring about
column here pay attention
everything jumps doesn’t mean if you look at what
shows 2 oscilloscopes tears return
this whole picture is how it is before
she cannot be stopped yes she is moving
constantly, well, that is, how would you
they tried to slow down the trigger
particles move
here they are it all here is such a picture
you should have flooring brofists
push apart this is a dancing sine wave but
it’s not so visible but if
twist such fish run here and on
this oscilloscope is very visible
by the way, show it in different ways
this is better seen as
all these fluctuations happen see
frequency 1163
but it depends on which Conder
hang but the most interesting thing is that I
noticed what is being input
sine wave
that is, it is necessary to achieve somehow here
of this moment so that the sinusoid is
without a sine wave very bad resonances and
on these very harmonics here
get practically nothing
get of course everything is fine but not the one
effect that's so work for today
I will wind the cable and then I will show
further how what such here such
the picture should be visible
that the amplitude is constantly jumping
it's spinning particles current bounces to
at the top this is what we need to do when here
such a picture we will have then
get on 6 i

Oleg is a friend of mine, I have some of his work on my website. His Forum name is Allega. He has build a lot of Circuits and things for Ruslan.

The information is there, its all right there, it only take some study and some experimentation, and we have steps forward! This is why we here at Aboveunity.com are so far ahead of the other forums! We have working machines, while that still have not even figured out the basics of the technology!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

Chris

Chris posted this 13 June 2020

My Friends,

I want to quote another very important statement made by Floyd Sweet:

The first term ( B x V ) in the equation represents the flow of the magnetic field when the electrons are moving in one direction, while the second term ( -B x -V ) defines the flow of the magnetic field when the electrons are moving in the other direction.

Reading this, in conjunction with the last post, above, in context with the document, we gain very important insight! What does this mean, Visually?

Well, you will note, we have seen this before:

This was covered in detail in the thread: Parallel Wire or Bifilar Coil Experiment

We have the Standing Wave we have covered so many times:

Where:

• B = Red Arrow ( Vector ) having both Positive and Negative values.
• V = Blue Arrow ( Vector ) having both Positive and Negative values.

I hope, what I am sharing, is starting to make some sense?

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends,

Chris

• Liked by
cd_sharp posted this 14 June 2020

Hey, buddy

You certainly have caught my attention with this thread. Logically thinking, if the force that is binding the electron to the atom is magnetic, we can never defeat it using a magnetic field. If we wish to move the Earth from its orbit around the Sun, we need to use a force on a direction that is orthogonal to the revolution direction.

What is orthogonal to a magnetic field? The E-field, of course. And we know both from theory and experiments that the best way to make an E-field is by colliding 2 changing magnetic fields:

That's one of the most insightful diagram I've ever seen.

Best wishes

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

cd_sharp posted this 19 June 2020

Hey, everyone

I found this awesome experiment:

This gives me something new to think about in the POCs context.

Best wishes

"It's just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" (Steven Mark)

Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Recomended Protocol:
Our Above Unity Machines:
Start Here:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).