Floyd Sweet gave us the following Analogy of how his Machine worked:
An approximate analogy, not by any means perfect, is as follows:
Picture a side-wheel paddle steam boat making its way down stream in the same direction as a fairly strong tidal flow. Assume the steam engine to be highly efficient, say 80%. Now assume the engine to be working at this efficiency and that the tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship.
The acceleration increases to a point where the horsepower increases beyond that equivalent energy consumed by the engine. If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity.
This is hypothetical. As the momentum of the tide relates only to the mass of the steamboat’s displacement of the medium, water.
Actually if the forward momentum of the tide was able to relate only to the paddle wheel the forward or positive force would tend to force the wheel to turn in the opposite or negative direction. Then in the hypothetical case, the force of the tide on the mass of the ship would equal the force acting on the paddle wheel and the ship would be motionless.
In order to move in the forward direction, the engine would need to overcome the negative force of the tide on the wheel. Little engine hp would be needed, as it would integrate with the positive flow of the tide, acting on the displacement mass of the ship. The above is not achievable in practice, as the only way the tide could relate to the paddle wheel in such a manner, the mass of the ship would have to be completely out of the water and only the wheel within the flow of the tide would turn, as the momentum of the flow of the tide would not be in effect.
This is reactive power – no work is done.
The wheel turns but the ship is motionless. Conversely, if this were a possibility, then a ship moving against a strong tide, would be able to traverse a river without either engine of sail, by means of the force of a moving mass of water against the wheel paddles. As stated, the force of the mass of water flowing against the displacement mass of the ship predominantly opposes the positive motion of the ship.
The analogy though far from perfect, suggests that if one were not aware of the visible force acting on the movement of the ship, at times, assuming all parameters were measurable, the indication might be that the engine was capable of greater than unity efficiency.
In the case of the Space Flux Coupled machine, there is no visible entity. It’s abstract. A steady state coherent force is present when brought under the influence of the electromagnetic controllable forces. It returns to an incoherent state when the initiating magnetic forces are absent (except in the case of a permanent magnet).
Ironically, the very next paragraph is:
The feedback loop: Previously mentioned, you will more clearly see how the loop functions at the time you see the physical construction of the stationary armature of stator assembly.
The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases.
Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges.
Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.
An illustration will help to clarify how the feedback principal counters the magnetic force binding the electrons in orbits, restraining them from motion as charged particles in the form of an electric current.
Some time back, I explained to CD, that once this Analogy was understood, the building Above Unity machines would be very much easier. Well this is true, from a perspective that properly understands the Analogy!
Lets Deduce this using Forces:
- fairly strong tidal flow of the Stream or River.
- paddle wheel driven by an Engine that is 80% Efficient.
- mass of the Ship in the Water of the Stream or River.
Interestingly, 80% is approximately Transformer Efficiency! Now, the statement:
If one were not aware of the tidal flow energy integrated with that of the consumed energy, one would conclude the engine efficiency was greater than unity.
Floyd Sweet is telling us, Greater then Unity, this is achievable, but what has to occur for this to happen?
Floyd Sweet said: "tidal energy integrates with that of the engine in propelling the ship", this means that, 1: The Tidal Flow Force Integrates, is summed with, +, or Addition, with the Engine's efficiency driving the Paddle Wheel:
Floyd Sweet is specifically talking about the Engine Efficiency: 80% and getting that: 80% over 100%, greater than Unity!
To do this, Floyd tells us, an Extra Force, Adds to the 80%, is Integrated to the 80%, this Force is the Tidal Force, pushing on Mass of the Ship, doing Down Stream or River.
We already know, if one looks at the M.M.F as 1 Unit: 1 + -1 + 1 = 1. Now normally, without the extra force, the equation would be: 1 + -1 = 0.
So by having this extra force, we have the ability to get the System up and over %100 Efficiency, a Greater than Unity System, or as we here at Aboveunity.com know, an Above unity System!
You will note, Floyd Sweet does not specify the Magnets in the Analogy! Remember what he had to say here:
Assume a load on the machine draws a measured current of 1.0A at a terminal voltage of 240 V. At a power factor of unity, the current and voltage are in phase. The power output is in watts and √3EI (1.732)(240)(1.0) 415.68 watts. The current is sensed by conventional current transformers having a 1:1 ratio, rectified by a three phase full wave bridge. This D.C. output is applied to a current winding closely coupled to the power-phase windings, but isolated to a degree that prevents transformer action from including voltage in the D.C. winding. This winding produces a magnetic field that varies in intensity as the square of the load current on a 1:1 isolation ratio. This is the same magnitude as the load current peak value. The D.C. flux varies as the square of the current and not sinusoidally as does the voltage and current of the power phase windings, with proper capacitors across the D.C. control voltage. The D.C. flux remains constant sustaining a constant flux during Δt. The flux produced by the moving charges comprising the load current goes through zero, thus the complimentary flux, that is integrated with the coherent flux, aiding the cross flux between the attracting magnets. Thus the system is self-regulating. As the load current increases, the complimentary flux adds to the cross flux. The voltage output remains constant. The primary limiting factor is the cross sectional area of the phase winding conductor.
You can see, there is an effort to preserve the Output Voltage: "The voltage output remains constant". This as we all know, is a problem we have faced already and solved in my experiments: Non-Inductive Coil Experiment.
This does show an integration with the DC Magnets Flux, notice DC Flux, again making the Magnet Conditioning idea look foolish! This, showing the possibility of the magnets adding Energy to the System.
The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.24 1018 electrons / second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes.
Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field. Thus a conductor that formerly had a temperature rise above ambient labelled as a factor of 10 would now operate at a temperature of 1.0. Thus the same gauge wire would carry 10 times more current at the same temperature.
This line of thinking is amazing to read! It is an amazing accomplishment! Now, remember, this is The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator, but Floyd Sweet said:
The underlying principles are the same.
The defining equations are similar to those of the dynamic Space Flux Coupled alternator.
Again, no conditioning:
The magnets producing coherent quantizing of the incoherent quanta packets comprising the surrounding space field, providing a continuous stream of energy from an infinite source.
Magnet Conditioning is foolish, it just is! It is a hoax, a red herring to throw others off the truth!
Best wishes, stay safe and well,