Who Believes in Radiant Energy?

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • Poll
  • 390 Views
  • Last Post 11 December 2019
Radiant Energy is just Energy that Radiates!
4 Votes
Radiant Energy is some sort of Magical Energy that will save us all!
0 Votes
Chris posted this 10 December 2019

My Friends,

Recently we have had some talk about "Radiant Energy" - A term Coined by Nikola Tesla.

In context, he stated:

This new power for the driving of the world's machinery will be derived from the energy which operates the universe, the cosmic energy, whose central source for the earth is the sun and which is everywhere present in unlimited quantities

Ref: teslaresearch.jimdo.com

 

How does a Solar Cell work? The Sun initiates a Chemical processes to then Separate Charge!

Also, in the same page:

It is well known that certain radiations—such as those of ultra-violet light, cathodic, Roentgen rays, or the like—possess the property of charging and discharging conductors of electricity, the discharge being particularly noticeable when the conductor upon which the rays impinge is negatively electrified. These radiations are generally considered to be ether vibrations of extremely small wave lengths, and in explanation of the phenomena noted it has been assumed by some authorities that they ionize or render conducting the atmosphere through which they are propagated. My own experiments and observations, however, lead me to conclusions more in accord with the theory heretofore advanced by me that sources of such radiant energy throw off with great velocity minute particles of matter which are strongly electrified, and therefore capable of charging an electrical conductor, or even if not so may at any rate discharge an electrified conductor either by carrying off bodily its charge or otherwise.

Ref: teslaresearch.jimdo.com

 

Ask the simple question, what is the Capacitor charged with? In what method do we measure this Charge? How is the Capacitor Charged? Charge must flow, yes? Charge in the exact same form as we would normally understand the charge, yes?

There is massive confusion, for example, do a search using these two different terms: Nikola Tesla Energy Quote and then Nikola Tesla Radiant Energy Quote. The results may shock you!

The term: Scalar, is also another term that is used with no understanding.

scalar

adjective
   (of a quantity) having only magnitude, not direction.

noun
   a scalar quantity.

 

It should be noted: All Energy Radiates - Nikola Tesla's statements also confirm this:

Many useful applications of this method of utilizing the radiations emanating from the sun or other source and many ways of carrying out the same will at once suggest themselves from the above description.

Ref: METHOD OF UTILIZING RADIANT ENERGY.

 

An Electromagnetic Field Radiates EM Energy! An Antenna Radiates EM Energy!

I do wish those throwing around these terms, they have very little to no idea on the context, the meaning and the Experiments behind the definitions of such Termed Words, would take a little time to actually see that there is Zero Magic, Zero Illusive Science, mostly known principles.

Nikola Tesla told you:

The sun as well as other sources of radiant energy throw off minute particles of matter positively electrified, which, impinging upon the plate P, communicate an electrical charge to the same.

Ref: METHOD OF UTILIZING RADIANT ENERGY.

 

 

Nikola Tesla built a UV Ray Antenna, that's all!

So many people get all fizzy when thy hear fanciful terms like this, thinking that its easy to find a whole new Science an the world would then be saved.

I believe, it is very Important that we stay Grounded in Fact! I believe Nikola Tesla said similar things:

 

Don't be Fooled by miss-conception! Stick to Fact!

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 10 December 2019

My Friends,

Dont forget, Nikola Tesla's most famous quote of all:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

 

If you understand what Kinetic Energy is and how that applies to today's known principles, then some sort of magical, fanciful, mysterious "Radiant" Energy is clearly frowned upon by the great man himself, Nikola Tesla!

People that loosely throw these terms around, with Zero Understanding and do not know the Context in which these terms were used, are fooling themselves and others!

Don't be Fooled by miss-conception! Stick to Fact!

   Chris

Vidura posted this 11 December 2019

There is no need to believe in anything I would say, at least most of the things that we treat and discuss here on the forum can be tested by simple means. Certainly I have noted that the threads titled with fancy terms, or simply adding Teslas name are the most viewed. It is something in human nature witch is attracted. Anyway, do you think that these kind of audience will make a difference? I dont think so, the ones who will make the difference, and actually are part of something different, something better, are our active members, those who are doing the bench work, real investigation based on experience. We dont need a million dollar lab to do it, we can gain knowledge doing simple experiments ,as it has been shown many times. Of course there are the passive ones, reading and hopefully learning, and also the "copycats"wink, but at the end all will contribute to spread out the knowledge, so that the day will come when all the population of the planet will benefit from this, and of course the planet itself, our home.

Vidura

Chris posted this 11 December 2019

I agree Vidura,

You are very wise!

When you say:

Certainly I have noted that the threads titled with fancy terms, or simply adding Teslas name are the most viewed. It is something in human nature witch is attracted.

 

This is true, and it is also sad!

 

Anyway, do you think that these kind of audience will make a difference?

 

No, no I don't! Views do not mean anything, its real work, as you point out!

 

I dont think so, the ones who will make the difference, and actually are part of something different, something better, are our active members, those who are doing the bench work, real investigation based on experience.

 

I agree, yes we have already seen this! I very much respect our Members that get in and do the very simple cheap experiments we have shared here on this forum! They are the ones that will benefit!

 

We dont need a million dollar lab to do it, we can gain knowledge doing simple experiments ,as it has been shown many times.

 

Again, I agree - Cheap Simple Experiments can teach the Experimenter more than any Textbook!

 

Of course there are the passive ones, reading and hopefully learning, and also the "copycats" wink, but at the end all will contribute to spread out the knowledge, so that the day will come when all the population of the planet will benefit from this, and of course the planet itself, our home.

 

I also hope the Passive Readers are learning, and I wish they would join in!

The Copy-Cats, well we need say no more...

The spread out the knowledge is the most important thing! It is extremely important! That's why I have shared little bits over time, to bring this technology, simple and cheap, into the public domain to become main stream. Others, the smart ones, they have that gut feeling that tells them this is the right thing and it makes sense!

Many see that day now Vidura, its been shown that a few simple coils and the right knowledge can provide Energy Out, greater than was input to the System!

You are a very Wise Man Vidura, thank you for your kind and wise words.

   Chris

Zanzal posted this 11 December 2019

The term Radiant Energy the way it is currently used is more in recognition of Tesla himself. In the manner it is currently used it is generally an implication that a device is based on ideas or technology pioneered by Tesla (i.e. based on magnifying transmitter concepts). If the argument is we shouldn't use the term Radiant Energy that way because Tesla didn't then perhaps you have a good argument. But words change over time and adopt new meaning, we can call a capacitor a condenser too if we want. I'm sure Tesla would approve, but it would be considered anachronistic.

Chris posted this 11 December 2019

Hey Zanzal,

Re:

But words change over time and adopt new meaning

 

I agree! 

So many now use the term as if to imply a new Science with a New type of Energy, a Magical Science that we dumb Humans have not yet observed.

10 out of 10 times, these people are looking at High Voltage Spikes.

For a sensible, logical mind, this destroys the credibility of the claimant! Painting the claimant as a Buffoon! However, for those that are learning, they follow and they go no where!

For Electrical Energy, every single Meter, Oscilloscope, Conductive Cable and the Insulation around the Cable depends on a very specific and a very well defined axiom:

  1. A Voltage.
  2. A Current.
  3. The combination of the two over Time.

 

This can not change! It just cant!

So, for every single Watt Second, or Joule per second, a Voltage and a Current must be present, where in the summation of the two gives the given quantity!

Of course, you and I, and many Members here already know: 1 Volt ( 1 Coulomb ) x 1 Amp ( 6.24 x 1018 Electrons per second ) is equal to 1 Watt Second.

Others that bend and twist, I think sometimes deliberately, perhaps paid Propaganda, change these meanings, make the meanings so Uncredible, that they destroy the credibility of the original person that coined the term.

Time and time again I have seen this - We need to set the Record Straight! Remove the Lies!

   Chris

Members Online:

No one online at the moment

Since Nov 27 2018
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close