As I'm far from my workshop I was doing some theory research , and found some valuable information in the work of Sergey Deyna and other Russian researchers. I am working on the translation of the most relevant documents to post it on this place. For the moment I'm limited for uploading, as I don't have access to my PC. So y just will try with a smaller size file, ant the text inside the illustrations will remain in Russian for the moment. More will be posted soon. Regards Vidura.
Towards a more complete understanding of EM.
- Topic Is Sticky
- 946 Views
- Last Post 5 weeks ago
This document is a continuation of the investigation of the longitudinal magnetic field component.
And here in this work, which I found of special interest, Sergey give an analysis of the principal inconsistencies of textbook physics, and proposes a different model to explain the phenomena of wave propagation and ether environment.
This is a revised translation of the document about Registration of Radiant energy, for easier lecture. I believe that it is related to the effects we are looking for in many of the threads. Pay attention to the sawtooth waveform when the Radiant effect is present, Due to the size of the file it is divided in tree attachments. here the link for the original video from Sergei Deyna:
This is the newest of this serie, the video in Russian and a translated document attached.
Radiant Tesla test by Roman Karnouhov. Pay attention to the SAWTOOTH waveform when the Radiant effect is present !!
Firstly i wanted to remark that this thread is basically indented to share information , with the goal to get a better understanding of physical phenomena's and specially electromagnetic interactions. There is no intention to lead experimenters to any particular method or device. For this are other threads specifically orientated as guidelines.
Find attached a document about Selfinduction and backEMF en context with the ether environment. Chronologically this doc is previous to the one posted in the last post.
As Chris has stated several times : we have to change our way of thinking. We have been told certain "facts" so many times that it becomes difficult to see the things from a different point of view. Might it be that we confuse sometimes what is the cause of a certain phenomenon, and what the effect? Here a paper that explains such a simple device as a capacitor in a different manner.
Here a new released work from Sergei Deyna, a addition to the capacitor topic. I wanted to say that i found this investigations of Sergey by coincidence(?), as he dont publish in other languish but Russian. And is there where coherent explanations for many fisical phenomenon, which I could not understand before, I found this material worthwhile for reading and sharing. It would be good know some opinion of other readers as well.
I have not pondered too much on the subject of a Capacitor, but I have wondered if the Capacitor Plates are truly of different Charges? I mean we say the Plates are Charged either Positive or Negative. But do different Charges exist and if so, how many different types?
We have some idea from this table that the Electron has a few flavours:
So, if it is Electrons that are the Charge on the Plates, then its Anti particle, that is considered Positive, that is if there are both Positive and Negative Charge distributed across the Plates of the capacitor, which Electrons are considered to be which?
Electron Positron Pairs annihilate according to Science, so is this a possibility?
Chris, agreed, it is consistent that in a world of dualism two polarities of charges exists. Also Floyd Sweet and Don Smith talked about two polarities in there theories, so does Sergei in this papers, assuming a ether environment of dipoles ,which separates and combines again, at a much smaller scale.
Welcome dewetw! We squash Trolls here, so you're safe with us!
@Vidura, I agree. Isn't it crazy, we can fire particles around several Km's of circular EM Containment apparatus, but we cant explain Current in a Wire, or Charge on Capacitor Plates, at least with sufficient accuracy.
Some debate the legitimacy of Displacement Current, really, all moving Charge has a magnetic Field, so there is evidence to support Displacement Current, but also that does not.
Lets hope the material youre sharing sheds some light on these things.
I will share a experiment that i have performed during the testing of a new PWM signal tool. It is related to the topic of BEMF. It is stated in the textbooks that the BEMF is caused by a collapsing magnetic field, and the energy of this field transformes into a high voltage spike. So I was asking myself what would happen when I use a noninductive coil, is the BEMF present?
The setup is a simple hi side IGBT switch with a floating gate drive, in order to not only cancel the perpendicular "normal" magnetic field , but also the A-vector field(scalar magnetic) field I decided to use a noninductive pancake coil as inductor(Hooper coil).
The first test shows the scope shot of the BEMF with the bifilar coil connected as tesla pancake coil, the channel2 trace shows the driving pulse, channel 1 is 50 V / div :
The next test shows the same setup with same parameters , but the coil in non inductive configuration:
The voltage of the BEMF spike increased from 175V to over 400V and the puls duration decreased from 1us to 200ns !
Then I connected a cylindric bifilar coil with several hundreds of turns of a 0.7mm magnetic wire:
When connected as tesla bifilar coil I did not get a BEMF, due to the hi impedance and dc resistence of the coil, but in noninductive configuration there where still nearly 100V , although the pulse duration not that short as in the previous setup.
If it is not the collapsing magnetic field that causes the BEMF, what is it then?
My answer would be discharge of the dielectric field in an attempt to maintain the magnetic field. In the non inductive configuration the magnetic field is still there but infolded due to geometry and therefore not detectable.
Aetherholic - One truth, One field
This is a fantastic Experiment, it is very worth while doing simple yet intriguing experiments like this!
I found some satisfying answers in Radio Electronics theory, in my experiments, in the same area. The Near Field is an intriguing thing to study!
Take special note; of the Interference Patterns in the Near Field.
Around an Antenna, the Near Field has been measured:
Which is almost exactly the same pattern as the Van Allen Belts:
As above, so below, as within, so without, as the universe, so the soul…
― Hermes Trismegistus
When researching this area, we get results like: "Probing near-field thermal radiation", with images like so:
My humble opinion is, all Coils that carry a Current, have an associated Near Field Radiation pattern, it is possible to create conditions where this Pattern can be made to Pump, to create a Forcing Function, where Near Field Radiation is sucked into the Coil in great quantities. This brings us back to Tom Bearden:
Yes, he was right, the great man was right.
So, Once the Field has been created, then Non-Inductive Coils, Inductive Coils, any sort of Coils, must react to the Field when it changes in Time! Its always going to occur! If one Coil has a Voltage, or a Voltage Difference in relation to the other Coil in the Non-Inductive case, then the Fields must Pump! This is the Lorentz Force, and Faraday all at the same time.
Non-Inductive Coils are HIGHLY Inductive at the RIGHT Frequency!
Isn't that ironic . Now WHERE did all that Amplitude come from? Parasitic, I think not! The Kiddies over at TrollHangout.com will argue with what I am saying all day long, till the cows come home! It is right and True! Saludos Chris
Isn't that ironic . Now WHERE did all that Amplitude come from? Parasitic, I think not!
The Kiddies over at TrollHangout.com will argue with what I am saying all day long, till the cows come home! It is right and True!
Correct. There are different ways of explaining this but the result is the same, stimulation and hence increase of the Faraday static field outside the coil to discharge into it That's why Meyl's unification of faraday and maxwell is important. Maxwell only deals with a dynamic field. Unifying with Faraday gives both static and dynamic fields.
Aetherholic - One truth, One field
You have an excellent understanding of the subject matter, clearly very advanced in the field!
I guess, some unification could be seen as the full interaction of Opposing Travelling Waves, Standing Waves result, but not a new singular wave, instead we now have four waves, and of course this depends where one observes from.
Each wave is a result of the Equal and Opposite Law.
For each wave in, we have its equal and opposite out, from each side. but in the middle, the waves stand.
At-least, this is my opinion. I believe, if I understand your post correctly, this agrees with your meaning also?
An excellent series of posts, thank you gentlemen!
Yes, resonant wave interactions.
Aetherholic - One truth, One field
Some more info for those interested:
EM waves in vacuum are not force field waves as CEM prescribes; instead, they are oscillations of potentials and potential gradients. Potentials have a bidirectional EM wave-pair structure, where the bidirectional wave pairs are phaselocked in a harmonic series. In each wave pair, photons and antiphotons are continually coupling (into spin-2 gravitons) and decoupling. This is where gravitation and electromagnetics are unified.
Lets ask the question, what is a: "bidirectional EM wave-pair structure"?
A bidirectional EM wave is two waves, one in each direction, one in the Positive Direction, one in the Negative Direction.
We are looking at a Pair of these wave Structures, so we have Four Waves.
So we are right according to Tom Bearden. We have: THE FINAL SECRET OF FREE ENERGY.
Hey Friends, this is becoming very interesting, four waves, or two waves and there reaction or reflection!
I would like to remark this (momentary) conclusion from Sergei's capacitor investigation:
1) reactive voltage is a wave of longitudinal deformation of the ether medium in the form of compression-discharge, which moves outside the conductor, which, by G. Nikolayev, is called a scalar magnetic field.
2) the reactive current is a wave of a transverse deformation of the ether medium, which propagates outside the conductor and propagates perpendicular to the surface, which is called a vector magnetic field by G. V. Nikolaev.
3) voltage is a real analogue of a reactive voltage, that is, a longitudinal wave of deformation in the form of compression-discharge, but in a conducting medium it takes the form of a spatial separation of real charges for their excess and deficiency.
4) the current is a real analogue of the reactive current, that is, a transverse deformation wave in the form of twisting-stretching, but in a conducting medium it takes the form of a spatial twisting - skin effect and movement of real charges in it;
Could it be that the reflected waves, travelling backwards along the waveguide are originated by the reaction of the "real charges" in the conductive material to the original waves? Lenz' law from another point of view?
There is a lot to absorb there!
I agree with Aetherholic, many ways to view the same thing, and end up with the same result. Depending on the interpretation of the above statements, knowing the very movement of Charge constitutes an Electromagnetic Wave, then I also agree with you, there is an element of Duality there, as we have discussed!
Tom Bearden has said about the E. T. Whittaker 1903 and 1904 papers, he has shared this image:
I have attached the document: On A Testable Unification Of Electromagnetics, General Relativity, And Quantum Mechanics.
Interesting material Chris, And as it is remarked on the header of every page, it is not "updated"- falsified still. Anyway I will try to keep the theory as simple as possible, ideally anyone should be able to understand the essential principle. A short while ago I believed that it is the potential that makes current flow, but a simple experiment disproves this: if I can connect a discharged capacitor to a AC source at the moment of zero potential and have maximum current instantly! The cause must be other then electric potential. What is producing the phase shift of current to one side or the other, depending what device is connected to the AC source? Why there is no phase shift when a resistive load is connected? The understanding of this simple interactions will help a lot I think. I will continue looking for simple experiments . Regards Vidura.
A truly fascinating topic, Reactance!
What causes Phase Shift, or perhaps a better question, what causes Phase Shift to reduce to Zero when increasing a Load on a Transformer?
It took me a long time to gain an understanding of Reactance, Impedance and Resistance when dealing with Coils and Capacitors, but when I did, my world opened right up!
I don't want to fill your thread with content that you do not wish to be on here, but if you have any questions, I can try to answer to the best of my ability.
Voltage stays the same, Current stays the same, the properties in Space and Time are what's changed.
Thanks. Chris, For the moment I am trying to reflect and digest the information, in my feeling all points towards the magnetic waves and their timing (magnetic resonance). One more thing I will recall: in one his last papers Sergei Deyna stated the propagation velocities for the electric longitudinal and the magnetic transverse waves are different, and both far from the velocity of C assumed by CEM. I have asked him if this statements have been proven by experiments, and why the difference with the great speed measured in long transmission lines. He answered that the published information have been concluded by experimental results, and that the apparently high propagation velocities are related to torsion fields, that it is actually a signal , information which does not depend on velocity limitations. He told me that he is still investigating this field and will publish it when he got more results.
An interesting experiment Christian, I did never try with the Caduceus coil myself.As it is bifiliar it can be connected in inductive or no inductive configuration, I will search some information about it. It is ok if you post it here in this thread, as it could add new information related to this research, and I appreciate participation of other members. You can also post your own thread(s) for your experiments if you want to do so. Regards Vidura.
Thanks. Chris, For the moment I am trying to reflect and digest the information, in my feeling all points towards the magnetic waves and their timing (magnetic resonance).
No problem, completely understand.
One more thing I will recall: in one his last papers Sergei Deyna stated the propagation velocities for the electric longitudinal and the magnetic transverse waves are different, and both far from the velocity of C assumed by CEM. I have asked him if this statements have been proven by experiments, and why the difference with the great speed measured in long transmission lines. He answered that the published information have been concluded by experimental results, and that the apparently high propagation velocities are related to torsion fields, that it is actually a signal , information which does not depend on velocity limitations. He told me that he is still investigating this field and will publish it when he got more results.
The Speed of Light ( c ), 299,792,458 meters per second, is a Constant, according to Science. The speed of Electromagnetic Waves depend entirely the speed of Light, however the speed changes depending on the Medium Electromagnetic Waves travel in.
λ = V / f
- λ = wavelength, the distance between wave crests (m).
- V = wave velocity, the speed that waves are moving in a direction (m/s).
- f = frequency, the wave crests that go through a point in a certain time (cycles/s or Hz).
V is not always 299,792,458 meters per second, it could be much less for Electromagnetic Waves depending on the medium they travel in.
For example, inside a Coaxial Cable, the speed is around 67% of the speed of light.
I am guessing, if Sergei's experiments have found a discrepancy of this nature, perhaps relooking at the experiment before publishing may be a good idea. Of course I am looking at this with an open mind, but a cautious one also.
I have a friend that has worked with Antenna, an electronics engineer, very knowledgeable guy and he taught me a lot about this stuff.
Yes the speed of light is dependent upon the resonant medium it propagates through. So the speed of light is in fact the speed of wave propagation and is also subject to em retardation, that is, light propagation has a finite distance. This is applicable to transverse em wave propagation. Longitudinal propagation is another story.....
Aetherholic - One truth, One field
De Broglie Waves, a debate scientists still have not agreed upon .
Ref: Shubham Wagh
Did you read that: "Matter waves travel faster than light" - Now Normally, Enter the debate...
Personally, I have an opinion, and debating with others will not change my opinion as I expect you have much the same stand point, likely most of us do. That's why we all get on so well. But others, well, I have seen 12 - 15 years of the same debate on other forums. Round and Round in the same old Circles.
I am sure a few names of members of other forums come to mind right now .
Anyway, I do not wish to fill this thread with senseless chat, so I will leave it at that.
The last days we had a horrible weather, it was freezing cold in my workshop, and I caught a cold. So I was not able to advance with the planned testing's, but I took the opportunity to write down some things which I would like to share and discuss here.
Some reflections and thoughts about the creation and the physical universe and the consequences for some aspects of electromagnetic theory :
Modern astronomy came to the conclusion that about 99.9 % of the universe is constituted by a mysterious "dark matter" and according to their mathematic models this matter have a mass, and thus exists, although it is invisible. Of course it is nothing else but the "Aether" well known by ancient scientists who had taken its existence as granted. As well most of the known metaphysical and religious texts tell us that the first step of the creation was the Firmament, which is the same mysterious invisible matter again, which is bearing and sustaining all the other elements , objects and beings of the physical universe. There is a misconception in the apparently linear flowing of time as well, assuming a beginning and an end of time from the perspective of our perception. We should understand time more like a cyclic movement, a kind of wave or vibration. In this context the creation of the physical universe is a continuous process, it happens really in every moment and at all places , in every very atom or particle , they are continuously created from and reabsorbed by the primary element, the Aether.
The very knowledgeable Donald L. Smith has asked once the people of the audience how much electrons they think are moving from a electricity generation utility thru the transmission lines to their house. He gave them the answer: Not a single one! As some might have read Don Smith believed that electrons are made of pairs, combining one with more negative charge with one with less negative charge. The Russian investigator Sergei Deyna and some others presented a model where the electrons and other charged particles are formed by splitting in positive and negative domains the very tiny dipoles, which constitutes the Aether in its neutral state. It might be sometimes difficult to understand this things by using our analytic mind(left side of brain),but we can quite easy grasp the principals with analogies, and images( domain of the right side of brain). So here I will encourage to try to understand by analogies a widely spread misconception in electric and magnetic theories, the displacement of charged particles. Take as a comparison the transmission of sound in air or other mediums. Are the soundwaves carried by the molecules of the air? Yes! Does this movement implicit that air molecules have to move from the sound source to the ear? Definitively No!, although it could occur under certain circumstances like wind in the right direction. The same thing is applicable for waves in water, in this case, inside the medium we have longitudinal waves like sound waves, but in the interface of two mediums, air and water there are the superficial transverse waves. In all cases the water remains in its place or in its own movement patterns, but the waves propagates far away, and not even the strongest Tsunami event will displace water molecules from the tectonic movement to the distant shores. In the very same way we should threat the electric and magnetic currents as WAVES, propagating thru the invisible element of the Aether. As Nikola Tesla stated, if you want to understand the principals of the universe, you should think about in terms of vibrations, oscillations.
So far this is quite straightforward, but from the above mentioned analogies we could derive that wind and water currents also exists, although that the displacements manifested as waves would be more abundant. An intriguing question arises in this context, how would this analogy relate to DC currents? If I remember well in a paper from Tom Bearden(?) he had classified DC current in the same first category, as waves, originated by a dipole, and that the dipole supposedly is destroyed and recovered at a very fast rate, too fast for our currently available measurement equipment to be registered. For the moment I do not completely understand how the phenomenon of DC current could be explained with the theory of waves, If someone has more information and knowledge about , the contribution will be appreciated.
Hope your cold passes soon without getting worse!
I agree with what you're saying!
Holy crap this is good, finally something on this site i can get excited about other than Figuera. thanks vidura on the downloads am reading the second one posted. thanks all as i to agree that there is a media at which to everything must propagate through and according to Wheatstone it is much faster then what Einstein predicted which was not his prediction only permanently borrowed.
density of Eather pressure modalities dictates speed or propagation there of.
Thank you for the goodies. lots of reading to so.
@MM, Vidura is very wise, for sure!
I see some behaviour, mostly over at Troll Heaven, at the point of outright ridiculous. All they do is criticise and debate worthless piffle, all with zero progress.
The shallowness of ones existing so-called complete understanding is a disability some are doomed to live with for the entirety of their lifetime.
I used to like this guys videos, until I saw this video. Now I think this this guy might be paid to shoot down others. Don't you think the boy deserves a little respect? He receives only Criticism!
When we Human's properly understand very simple EM Theory, and importantly how to properly apply Electrodynamics, machines that fit in your pocket that can power a small city will be possible.
I have to say it, the Clemente Figuera Machine, now some 100+ years old, will be merely a very small stepping stone for a much greater and boarder future. I always liked Figurea's quote:
PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION - Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion...
The Clemente Figuera machine shows a concept, the concept can be reached many ways, and with a much simpler approach.
It shames me how dumb we have been kept! How people are happy to think they know everything, and to shoot other great minds down, even when faced with evidence to the contrary.
The Magnetic Field, which is the result of Mass, carrying a Charge, at Velocity, is a concept that most do not understand properly!
Lets be honest, what is a Magnetic Field, what is Energy, what induced Energy, what function is required for Energy Flow. How does the Magnetic Field affect the localised Space-time? What is the localised Space-time?
The human mind is capable of much greater things, yet most of us are happy to be limited to the most simple mundane approaches to reality. At Troll Heaven, they are currently debating such approaches, they claim they have some of the smartest minds, yet I see nothing but a bunch of Dumb on a continual basis!
Any logical mind with a clear understanding of Lenz's Law and is open to new possibilities, will very quickly see huge potential for Energy "Generation" in ways we have not realised as a Human Race.
- Liked by
- and 1 others
Thank you all for the positive comments on this thread, for those who like to study and understand natures secrets hopefully there is something valuable to grasp in this material. Find here attached another research from Sergey Deina, and the video of the experiments. Just skip the parts where he is reading the docs in russian, unless you speak russian of course.
Hi all, I would like to share another work from Sergei Deyna, about shockwaves and magnetostriction, IMO really helpful to gain better understanding on this phenomenon and specially on the standing magnetic waves, in the attached translation there is a lot of good theoretical work besides the described experiments. Here is the video:
As I'm trying to upload the file from my phone it might take a little bit time to accomplish the task. Regards Vidura.
As i was thinking many times about magnetic waves , standing waves lately I will take the opportunity to share some ideas about this topic. To a certain degree we could use the analogy of surface waves in a liquid medium in order to try to visualize the properties of standing waves, although it is not a very accurate comparison. Those of you who took the time to read the latest document from I had posted about magnetic shockwaves and magnetostriction will understand that surface waves are only partially reflect the properties of magnetic waves, as the latter occurs in a contiguous medium, the aether environment and in virtually all practical cases they do not exist as purely transverse or purely longitudinal waves, but are composed by both types of waves to variable degrees. Maybe a better analogy would be the propagation of acoustic waves, the effects could be easily reproduced doing simple experiments.
In first place an observation regarding the term "standing wave". As the very existence of a wave implicit propagation- movement, no wave can actually stand still, it can only apparently remain in the same place. In order to produce the effect of a standing wave two waves in opposite direction are needed, this can be achieved by two separate sources of waves with the same frequency and opposite direction, or by a single source fed in a waveguide, and be reflected back at some distance by appropriated means. As an example we could use two speakers facing each other at a certain distance and feed an audio signal into both. Now we have only to sweep the frequency , or adjust the distance until we get a standing wave, we will find that on certain places the noise level gets very high- the antinodes - and at a little distance it cancels out virtually- on the nodes. The effect is produced because the two opposite waves always add there amplitude(positive or negative) at the same place, and subtract it at the nodes(neutral areas, where any value of one wave is cancelled by an equal value of opposite sign of the other wave ).
Note that the antinodes are not constant , but changing the sign at the rate of the applied frequency, otherwise as in our speaker example there would be no audible sound, only an increased pressure zone.
What does this imply when we are dealing with magnetic waves? As in our analogy with the speakers , the standing wave phenomenon will only occur if we have two magnetic waves of equal frequency and opposite direction- opposing fields! Also the distance and the wavelength have to match. This can be calculated using the frequency and propagation speed in a given material, similar to the soundwaves in different mediums. This part I will leave for others more skilled in math's if you don’t mind. In the before mentioned document about magnetic shockwaves there can be found a table with propagation speed of magnetic waves in some different core materials(it is still in Russian, as the translator can't handle the image files.)
Now a very important fact regarding the nodes and antinodes in a standing magnetic wave: very similar as in our acoustic example the antinodes are not constant, they are changing in sign at the applied frequency. This means that if we would tap the standing wave at the antinode area, we would load the source, damping the wave by extracting power this way. But the difference to the acoustic example lies in the nodes, where the opposed sign of the two signals cancels the magnetic field! And as stated by Floyd Sweet a doubled E-field arises( equivalent to the scalar magnetic field postulated by the Russian researchers) . And this is exactly where we can find a chance to tap the energy without damping the original magnetic wave, as it is perpendicular to its origin.
A fantastic Post Vidura!
The 3D image I posted, took ages to build, explains some of this:
The Magnetic Field Components, two in total moving in opposite directions, cancel, they are still there, but the equal and opposite amplitudes cancel.
We still have 2x Current components, pointed out as you say by Floyd Sweet and others.
We must realise, the Magnetic Field Components are entirely dependant on Current, current through turns is the Magnetic Field.
There is a relative exponent there, for example with no load, no current can flow, so no effects are seen.
In continuation of this topic I wanted to add some more details. Please be aware that the analogy with acoustic waves is not perfect, as in the case of electromagnetism we deal with two different aspects of waves, longitudinal and transvers, or more accurate both together with variable predomination. So this way of explanation is intended only for easier understanding and visualization of the principals, and might differ in some aspects from actual EM waves. One aspect is how the reflection of the wave can be achieved, in the case that only a single source is used. We know well that in the case of soundwaves they can be reflected by a limit of two mediums of different state of aggregate or density, for example a wall or a water surface when the acoustic wave is travelling thru the air. This have its analogy in magnetic waves , which are reflected at the end of an open ferromagnetic core for example. But in EM waves we have another mean to reflect the magnetic wave, by using Lenz's law : we can employ a shorted or heavy loaded coil, ideally of a few turns of thick wire, when the magnetic wave reaches this coil, a current will start to flow, which give arise to an opposing magnetic wave to the original. This method gives us the advantage that we can use it as well in closed path cores or even in coreless coils.
Another detail I wanted to remark is that our exciter coils are bidirectional, they transform current into magnetic waves in the medium and vice versa. In our acoustic speaker experiment this means that the speakers can convert a current into a sound wave , but as well can operate backwards, inducing a current when it is hit by a soundwave. How we can use this to our advantage? It would be straightforward that with a correct timing and tuning of the wavelength the source can be assisted by the reflected or opposing wave, and would reduce considerably the energy required to sustain the standing wave. This is actually a resonance effect, which will push or pull on the exciter coil exactly at the right moment to assist it. As you can imagine, at elevated frequency and short wavelength the adjustment needed might be quite narrow, and also the physical length of the waveguide or core have to match for good results.
Please if you find that I'm mistaken in any aspect, your comments or corrections are always welcome.
Hopefully this helps some,
Standing waves and their relationship to "cold or radiant energy"
First I will share a small experience that I had when I was testing the Driver power supply of the modular switching tool:
in the first version the primary coil for the output transformers was a single wire which was wound with 9 turns around each toroid, that means four primaries in series. When I made measurements on the four outputs, unloaded and loaded , to my surprise I had a big difference of voltage and power. As we would assume from conventional Physics the same current, the same secondary's and cores and the primary being a single wire for the 4 transformers there should be the same output?? If we think in terms of electrons flowing thru a conductor, it should be equal, but the bench prooves this wrong.
But if we start thinking or trying to visualize in terms of waves it becomes understandable.
Here you can see a replication of a simple experiment(simple but requires accurate circuit tuning):
It is a experiment suggested by Hector D Perez Torres (ARK Research) in his booklet "How to build a ZPE research lab at your home". You can find it attached below and also the simplified circuit (tuning coil and capacitor not shown) .
Note that the LEDs are lit without voltage( or better electric waves canceled and magnetic wave doubled), it is the cold end of the oscilatory circuit , the Ampere or current node at the place of the load exactly.
Your 233 x 233 image
Content is screened.
More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:
The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!
Thank You So Much!