# Parallel Wire or Bifilar Coil Experiment

• Topic Is Sticky
• Poll
• 4.7K Views
• Last Post 13 March 2020
I do not understand this Thread?
I fully understand this Thread!
I partially understand this Thread?!
Chris posted this 23 January 2019

My Friends,

In the beginning, cursed with limited knowledge, I fumbled with the terms and diagrams of Floyd Sweet and others. Also taking note of other devices like Paul Raymond Jensen, Lester Hendershot and others, after some time I saw some common themes and base concepts.

Think Simple was my saviour!

### Voltage

Voltage is Elementary Charge, separated, creating a difference in Charge Potential on Each Terminal.

A concept requiring Conductance ( G ) = 1 / Resistance ( R )

### Current

A flow of Elementary Charge, originally defined as 6.24 1018 electrons per second past point P1 equaling 1 Ampere of Current. Current must be Pumped exactly the same as Water must be pumped to create a flow. Electrons in a Wire have Velocity, depending on the composition of the Wire, it can be close to the Speed of Light.

Also a concept requiring Conductance ( G ) = 1 / Resistance ( R )

Note: The closest analogy to Electrical Energy is Pumping Water through a Pipe!

Note: Kinetic Energy is the elementary motion of a body or bodies. Newtons, force = mass times acceleration.

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason; it has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic! If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

- Nikola Tesla, "Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency" (February 1892)

Take a length of Wire:

Immerse this Length of Wire in a Sinusoidaly Changing Magnetic Field.

We know and experimentally can prove, the Terminals, not shown, will have an E.M.F, Electromotive Force, or a Voltage will be Induced determined by: E.M.F = -N dΦ/dt

It can be experimentally proven that the Currents and Voltages will have a specific Polarity and Phase that is unchanging between the two Parallel Wires at all points during the Cycle.

It also can be proven that the Currents will be travelling in the same direction at all points during the Cycle. No matter what winding polarity is used - This is the result of the Driven Force Pumping the Current.

At no point during the cycle, do the Parallel Wires Buck each other.

We have seen, some Transformers are wound with bifilar Coils, as a method of doubling the Current with less total wire area:

This is not a Natural State for Parallel Wires when a Changing Magnetic Field is present!

A sinusoidal waveform can be shown to contain Electric and Magnetic individual components at different times:

This knowledge is critical knowledge to have and understand. Why? Because we have a means, in every aspect, to simulate an Electrical "Generator" using three things:

1. A source Magnetic Field changing in Time t. Not yet shown. Area shaded Green above.
2. Conductors with an Induced E.M.F and as a result potential for Current to Flow.
3. A means to Pump Current without adversely affecting the Input Source Magnetic Field.

Now what device do we know of that can Isolate Conductivity at a specific point in the Cycle shown above? Most of you no doubt will have an epiphany at this stage.

A Triac is capable of Conducting at a specific Point in the Cycle.

The waveform of a Triac can be tuned, or adjusted to look something like this:

Ironically, Floyd Sweet made use of a Triac, in his hoaxed Magnet Conditioning demonstration.

Note: A Triac is switched using Voltage. It is not a Current detecting device. So depending on ones configuration and if there exists a large Phase Angle difference between Voltage and Current, this may not be the best case method.

Most circuits are designed for a Mains Frequency and Voltage, so, some work to get the Frequency and Voltage you are working at may be required.

Many circuits exist, and many circuits can be employed, but the basic Voltage detection circuit is as follows:

Again, do not limit yourself to a specific circuit. However, your goal should be:

• Resistive Load to ensure Voltage and Current are in phase best as possible.
• One Partnered Output Coil must not be Conductive during the Electric part of the cycle.
• The effective Isolation of the Input to Output is effective during the Magnetic Part of the cycle.
• Learning what the difference in Conduction during part of the Cycle does: Bucking Magnetic Fields.

Remember, I said:

Circuitry can also be employed to delay Conduction on the second Partnered Output Coil.

Some work, some extremely simple understanding of the most basic fundamental things can be achieved by focusing on one thing:

1. Bring your Machine to life - Let the Machine do what Nature wants it to do!

Let it be that the Partnered Output Coils Pump each other! Using Timing to achieve a specific state! Invoke Parametric Excitations of Electric Oscillations. Note, when the Magnetic Fields slap together, we also see an Impulse Pressure Wave! At this point we see a Standing Wave!

Remember what Floyd Sweet said:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to E.

If you understand this, and all I have shared in other threads, then a simple circuit to allow your Machine to Live and Breath, will change the world today! Nature wants the Currents to Oppose, so let them, don't force the system to do something it does not want to!

For only a few dollars and an few hours work, one could learn more in this experiment than one may realise!

Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 13 March 2020

Hey Ourbobby,

Apologies, whats this in regards to? The Transformer Core you mention I am not aware of the context. Please explain and I might be able to help further.

Edit:

Ah Ha, in Zanzal's schematic:

Just use any core you can get your hands on. Zanzal reported that he was not successful on this machine. In saying this, others here on this forum are using a similar setup and getting very good results.

Best wishes,

Chris

• Liked by
Ourbobby posted this 13 March 2020

hi,

bv054-5387is not available. listed as obsolete by Mouser!

I suppose most small pulse transformers would work?

Regargs

ourbobby

• Liked by
Chris posted this 22 August 2019

Hey Mark,

A good document for all to have a read!

Here is the Bulgarian to English translation:

The following information provided by me in points and scheme is based on conversations with Gia (Tariel Kapanadze's assistant) and after the scheme is mainly my thoughts on the topic.

1. The primary circuit is high frequency - over 100KHz.
2. The primary circuit is a capacitor, a coil and a high-frequency spark.
3. Tariel Kapanadze accidentally discovers the effect of increasing the output energy on repeating Nicola Tesla's experiments to transfer energy over a single wire (and wirelessly).
4. The secondary output coil is a bifilar Tesla coil of which one part is used as a closed electromagnetic circuit (most likely resonated with a capacitor) and the other is a load coil. It is also grounded at one end of the load.
5. No magnetic conductors are used. Magnetic conductors interfere with the generation of free energy.
6. In the case of the generator with the green box, the high-voltage over 100KHz spark (discharge) takes place inside the green box. The external spark (discharge) is 50Hz and is set to the generator output frequency. 50Hz. sparkles on the primary thick coil (5-6 turns).
7. The secondary bifilar winding must have a conductor length of 1/4 of the wavelength relative to the high-frequency and high-voltage input which is above 100KHz.

I still cannot say that I understand how the Kapanadze generator works, but I think of the following. High frequency high voltage goes through the spark and so we have a high frequency spark. More importantly, this is also the operating frequency of the output-power coil. In this way, an electromagnetic field is created in the coil, and we have the specific inductance and permeability of the medium in and around the coil. If an electromagnetic field is introduced into and around the coil at a frequency of 50 Hz and again a shock (through a spark), then the inductance changes with the same frequency, and to be precise - it decreases. What happens next is that the high-frequency electromagnetic field converts an electric current of 50 Hz. We are not talking about synchronization but about converting the magnetic field into electric and more precisely into energy.

I think about the principle of impulse transformers: They use high frequency because the energy of the output depends largely on the frequency of change of the magnetic flux in them. One such transformer, for example, an inverter electric power, does not have a stronger magnetic field than the ordinary electric power at the same output power. The ferrite transformer is about the size of a cigarette box. The reason for having so much energy at the output is mainly due to the frequency of change of the magnetic flux at a much weaker magnetic field compared to the large iron and low frequency transformer. From this point of view, it doesn't even matter if the main magnetic flux in a transformer is constant or variable. If we can change the inductance or magnetic permeability in it with minimal energy losses, then we will also change the magnetic flux passing through the transformer. As a result, the constant magnetic field becomes variable and we have energy in the output coil. The principle of INCOMP is just that. Permanent magnetic field source and output coil. The control input coil with minimal energy changes the inductance and permeability of the medium between the coil and the magnet. The effectiveness of INCOMP is on average about 3 (300%). What if we use an electromagnet instead of a permanent magnet and the control current is high voltage and shocks through the spark? We also know that the cut off the electric impulse front, the greater the auto-induction and the faster the change in inductance and permeability of the medium. The result is more energy at the output.

In the ordinary transformer at output load, the input current increases because the magnetic field of the secondary winding reduces the inductive resistance of the primary. In addition, with a transformer load, the magnetic field of the primary winding weakens and this is the reason for the increasing input current. For a clearer view of the principle, we may not even have a secondary winding. In some of my experiments, with only one coil and no magnetic circuit, at ~ 12 volts at the input and high frequency control, the self-induction voltage is above 600 volts. It is also what Bedini uses when charging batteries. In my experiments, I supply 25-60W bulbs by bringing it to 230 volts and the efficiency is about 90% or more. That is - we quietly have a pulse transformer with a "good" efficiency, without a secondary winding, and even do it without a galvanic connection to the input.

What is the role of resonance in Kapanadze? - I think for two reasons: The first is that, at resonance, we have a maximum intense electromagnetic field and, accordingly, a maximum output energy with a minimum input energy. Well! That is not enough. The second type of resonance is the degree of interaction and synchronization between the energy circuit of the Kapanadze installation and the surrounding air space. Resonance, among other things, means maximum synchrony between two energy systems, whereby one with less energy receives from one with more energy, and this can happen at some frequency (rhythm). Tesla says while Kapanadze confirms that Ether is more energy than our known atomic matter. Kapanadze's inventions confirm it.

How can we interact with Ether so that we have an energy response from it? I think this is one of the most important questions we have to answer. The electromagnetic field is the intermediate force and medium between atomic matter and Ether. The electromagnetic field is the etheric energy and the interaction reaction with atomic matter.
There are certainly more important questions awaiting their answers, but I hope what I have written will help give birth to the right ideas and answers that will lead us to build a real free energy generator.

How does an ordinary parallel resonance circuit work? The energy in it circulates rhythmically between the coil and the capacitor at a frequency corresponding to their parameters. At one point, we have a magnetic field accumulated in the coil, and in the next, the magnetic field becomes electrical, which in turn drives the electrons to the capacitor, in which case it charges and vice versa. When the capacitor is charged and its charging electric field from the coil is minimal, the energy charge of the capacitor is drawn to the coil and again converted into a magnetic field, and again and again.

To a large extent, there are some similar principles between Don Smith and Kapanadze and some are that they do not use magnetic circuits and operate at high voltages with very steep fronts. This is also their resemblance to Tesla.

1. In the absence of a magnetic circuit, the feedback of the secondary winding is reduced in relation to the primary winding, thus avoiding or reducing the chain reaction.
2. In the absence of a magnetic circuit, the primary and secondary winding fields have a stronger interaction with the Ether and the reaction on its part than with the use of an intermediate magnetic circuit.
3. High-voltage steep pulses are used, and they cause the ether energy response in the form of a large self-inductive voltage in the secondary winding. Voltage is an electric field and it is what drives the electrons to create current through the load.
4. In primary circuit resonance, the high voltage induction is very high and can support high current in the output coil and load.

If, in Don Smith, the use of earthing would be more of a protective purpose, if at all it is one of Kapanadze's most important roles - it creates and acts as the opposite of Ether's electrical potential to the installation itself. For example: For a Tesla transformer to have a secondary winding discharge to Earth, it is not necessary at all that one end of the secondary winding is grounded. The important thing in this case is not to have a closed electrical circuit, but that the Earth and any conductive surface or body is always of opposite potential to the high voltages of the secondary of the high-voltage transformer. The same effect is achieved with a simple car coil controlled by a simple electronic rectangular pulse generator, regardless of the frequency. The interesting thing is that at a very high frequency and without a magnetic circuit, we have almost no magnetic field in Tesla's secondary transformer, but mostly a very strong electric field. That is - we reduce the magnetic component and increase the electrical ....

Ref: Капанадзе - Теория

Hope this helps some!

Chris

• Liked by
patrick1 posted this 22 August 2019

Haha nice link, my ruski is coming along strongly

Hey Mark ;-). i hope my enthusiasm in my PM shown through. -  i feel amazed that somthing like a tesla coil is so hopelessly inefficient. ,,, yet is able too send radio waves further than i can even see !!!

its incredible. ...  but my first tests's 20 years and 2 months ago, with resonant cores.  showed potential, - but kids see potential in everything !!

anyways, now i the sinisizsm of a grown up scientist, and i wonder.  is COP 3 really enough ?. or do i need too spend \$800 on a transformer too get 50watts ?...   ...  mabee i should go back too model areoplanes ;=D  **walks off for some ruski

• Liked by
mark posted this 22 August 2019

Ok, here goes. I'm going to try and post a link to the site I mentioned in my last post. Don't know if it will work or not.

He calls it a "bifilar Tesla coil of which one part is used as a closed electromagnetic circuit" which i think probably refers to a POC. Having no idea what is meant by "closed electromagnetic circuit." Any thoughts?

I know there is a lot of information and disinformation on the web so you may want to take it as a grain of salt.

Mark

PS I found some ceramic resistors that i salvaged off of an old circuit board here while back.That's all I was waiting on to start my driver build.I think they are wire wound and that is what i needed. Need to be non inductive. When i get some time going to try and put together.

mark posted this 20 August 2019

Thanks for the vid Patrick. You said something that intrigued me. You said something to the effect that you can operate the coils above 400 or so Hz but you cant push as much current through them. Could this be because of core saturation. I remember hearing that Kapanadze insisted that there was no ferromagnetic conductor in his build. Maybe  this is the reason why? It limited current amplification in the P.O.C because of saturation of any core material. Hmmm.

If I knew how to post a web link there is one I think you might find interesting if your into the Kapanadze build that is.

Going to have spend some more time in the welcome link.

Waiting on some components in the mail to arrive to build a driver circuit. Then "it's off to the races" =) I am chomping at the bit to try this.

• Liked by
patrick1 posted this 20 August 2019

Hi Mark,  my attempts at the mr preva experiment were not ground breaking,  - but they did work, and did so immediately, -  others got better results, from what was obviously more experimentation, - but all you need it too overbake a CRT flyback, - too about 200c, for 10 mins. and the core will slide out with eze..

then copy the coils,  2 poc's, minimal windings. and its off to the races, - you dont need a sine generator, - just jump on youtube and search for  a frequency test video, preffereably one that takes 5 mins. - and it will produce a sine wave, and slowly sweep up through the frequency band, - and just wait watching your light globes and power meters.....  - mine happened exactly as shown in various places, ( @ about 450hz ).

Chris posted this 19 August 2019

Welcome Mark,

We are all here to help each other out and we are all at different levels.

I see you have already done good research!

I like to quote Sir Richard Feynman: "Little steps for little feet..."

Bench work is the most important and how we progress the fastest.

Chris

• Liked by
mark posted this 19 August 2019

Hello to all,

This is my first post on this forum and i feel both very lucky to have found this site as well as a little overwhelmed. I have been taking in a lot of info for the past several days and some is making sense while others is way above my head.

I am a newb at best when it comes to electronics but have been fascinated with alternative  energy for a long time, particularly the Kapanadze gernerator(KG). I believe I seen a post some where but cant locate it again, about there being P.O.C on the KG I thought this for a long time but had no idea of the princaple involved.

I am wanting to build a variant of YoElMiCrO's Circuit to try and learn but the dots on the coils are causing a bit of confusion. Are the coils wound in opposing directions or in the same direction on the P.O.C side of the traf? I would try the Mr. Preva exp. but have no sine generator and I think it requires a sine wave on the input if I remember.

Also, I have no occiloscope or anything and wouldn't know how to use it if i had one. How will i know if i am on the right track?

Any and all help would be appreciated. Thanks!!

• Liked by
Chris posted this 11 March 2019

My Friends,

This is such am important thread!

• Let your Bucking Coils Build a Voltage, then switch in the Conduction!

The MEG Team used a TVS Transient Voltage Suppressor, also called a Transorber.

By Studing and understanding this thread, Simple Cheap Energy Machines can easily be built! There is no more pipe dreams, its all here!

### Delayed Conduction

Delayed Conduction, as we have so specifically laid out on this thread:

The Zener Diodes, D1 and D2, only conduct at Voltage V. Delaying the Conduction in the Circuit.

We have the requirements satisfied:

• Voltage on the ends have reached at least 18 Volts.
• We can conduct at 18Volts automatically, and the Conduction is in one polarity.
• As we have learnt in The Mr Preva Experiment, Currents will Oppose!

This gives an example of what the Coils will do when they suddenly conduct, as shown above, 5.65 times more voltage because of the way the Conduction is delayed, and the Coils slap together, creating excessive Energy gains, completely disconnected from the Input!

This is just an Example, a method of exploration!

Chris

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 08 March 2019

Hi Chris

The oscillator is interesting to experiment and I see in your other research that you had taken into account the physical aspect of the components.

Jagau

• Liked by
Chris posted this 08 March 2019

Hey Jagau,

A parametric oscillator is a driven harmonic oscillator in which the oscillations are driven by varying some parameter of the system at some frequency, typically different from the natural frequency of the oscillator.

Some years ago ( 17/12/13 ), this was what I focused on, after reading about The Russian Parametric Oscillator and the amazing Energy gains there.

By varying/changing a parameter in our small machines at the right part of the Cycle we can then achieve Energy Gains also.

Normally Bucking Coils would be thought of Restricting Voltage, however, by allowing the Voltage to go high, then Bucking, we have a very different machine!

Chris

Jagau posted this 08 March 2019

Great video Chris

You give me good very ideas for my current experience.

Thank you

Jagau

Chris posted this 07 March 2019

My Friends,

A keyword: Relationship

The Relationship we experimentally see, is key to moving forward with Partnered Output Coils as a technology.

A video:

If one thinks, how to hold a Potential High, the answer is Bucking Coils! Partnered Output Coils!

Chris

Vidura posted this 06 March 2019

Hey Cd It might be helpful to add a capacitor on the primary , if you use lower frequency maybe 2~10uf and setup the input pulses to ~30%dutycycle. So you will see a sinusoidal wave at input.Then tune the output switch to close after current peak. If you can setup a pulstrain it might amplify the output.(switch on continuous, then at timing pulsed switching off). Hopefully this helps! Vidura.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 06 March 2019

Hey CD,

Thanks, my tired old brain struggles sometimes to figure these things out.

We should see, Voltage and Current in a sinusoidal shape, until 90+ degrees, both equal and opposite to the input. Transformer style Induction.

We then Interrupt the Conduction of one of the Parallel Wires by switching if off. When we switch it off, we need to study the effects between the two Parallel Output Coils.

The effects to study are important.

Chris

cd_sharp posted this 06 March 2019

Hey, man

The Currents must be in the same direction, not Bucking. Is this how you have them configured?

Yes, L2 is CW, wired to flow from the beginning to the end of the wire. L3 is CCW, wired to flow from the end of the wire to the beginning when the MOSFET is on. Applying the right hand rule results in the same field direction from 0-93 degrees.

I'll try to cleanup a little the traces and maybe change the coils and core. Thanks!

• Liked by
Chris posted this 05 March 2019

Hey CD,

With the Parallel Wire Experiment, the ends of the Parallel Wires, tied together at the same end, each end are the outputs:

The Currents must be in the same direction, not Bucking.

Is this how you have them configured?

Or are they Bucking from Zero Degrees?

Chris

Chris posted this 05 March 2019

Hey CD,

Thanks for sharing!

My Friend, my tired old eyes are not the best this time of the morning, so forgive me, but I think something odd is going on.

L2 and L3 should have the same Voltage and Current waveforms until the dropping of the Conduction, and the waveforms should resemble the sinusoidal shape. This should follow, but be, 180 degrees from your input.

You can try a pulse train on Q1, which may have a better chance of making the wave form evident. Off the top of my head, I cant remember what I initially suggested above, but give a few configs a try.

I am sorry my friend, I just had my coffee, so maybe in a few more minutes I will be able to see what's going in.

Thanks for sharing! Its great to see! Great Job!

Chris

• Liked by
cd_sharp posted this 05 March 2019

I disconnected the dark blue and the pink probes. The input signal and the signal to the gate of the MOSFET are these:

You can see the input signal is not exactly half of a sine wave. My function generator supports custom traces. So I've drawn it quickly, just to get something close enough to half of a sine wave.

• Liked by
cd_sharp posted this 05 March 2019

Hey, guys
I tried this experiment, only the coils are one over the other but wired to produce the needed polarities according to the right hand rule.

The yellow trace is the input voltage (a little distorted as the ground clips are on the current sensing resistors). It is actually half sine wave (50%) followed by off time (50%).
The light blue trace (CH 2) is the voltage over the MOSFET gate, also distorted. It is actually off from 93 degrees on (25.8 % duty cycle, in phase with the input signal).
The current through L2 is the dark blue trace (CH 4). We can see the storage and decay phases and there is almost no current flowing when the input is off.
The pink trace is the current through L3. We can see a large current flowing backwards through diode D2 from the time when the MOSFET is switched off to whenever we disrupt it with our input.

Chris posted this 05 March 2019

My Friends,

I want to bring up the use of, and the interpretation of: Pumping Current

Some time ago, I posted a thread that featured the Human Heart: Energy Machine Operation

The definition of the term Pump is:

any device for compressing, driving, raising, or reducing the pressure of a fluid, esp by means of a piston or set of rotating impellers

What is Lenz's Law?

In an Electrical "Generator", Lenz's Law is the Direct Opposition to a Change in the Magnetic Field.

Keywords: Change and Magnetic Field.

• The Change is the difference over Time ( dt ).
• The Magnetic Field is Current, M.M.F, Magnetomotive Force.

Normally, due to the asphyxiation of Symmetry our Pioneers in Science have been obsessed with, the Actions of Lenz's Law must only ever occur between our: Input and our Output

And about now, you're saying this guy is a bloody raving moron! We have been through this before! But bear with me.

### Experiment

A small Electrical "Generator" is our machine for experiment. The rotor has a constant speed of 200rpm. The Rotors Magnetic Field can be instantaneously controlled via switching apparatus.

The Output Coil has a sinusoidal Voltage across a 10 Ohm Load, of 10 volts.

At peak Cycle, the Rotors Magnetic Field is switched off, there is now, instantaneously, zero Magnetic Field in the Rotor.

What occurs to the Sinusoidal Voltage and thus the Current on the Output?

### Result

The Voltage and thus the Current fall to Zero in the form of an Inductive Spike. The Voltage, and therefore the Current can no longer be Supported at the Amplitude desired. Therefore, the Rotors Magnetic Field was a Supporting Factor in the Amplitude on the Output. Current is Pumped by an Equal and Opposite Current!

Continuing:

The Magnetic Field, M.M.F, Magnetomotive Force is Work: f = m ⋅ a, we have covered this in the Thread: Increasing the Rate of Kinetic Energy

Force is in the form of a Current, depending on how one wants to define it, as Electrons per second past point P1, or in the form of Inertial displacement of the immediate space, Aether. The only medium that can act back on this form of Force, is its equivalent, another Magnetic Field, which by definition, is Lenz's Law. So a second Conductor is introduced to oppose, or counter balance this originating Force. We end up with a stationary moment of Inertia:

The box stand still, goes no where due to equal and opposite forces!

The second conductor must have an initiating moment, so it can act back on its partner. And so, it is shocked into action, covered in part in the Thread: Impulse Pressure Wave.

Now we have bought about a state that I have not been able to find an equivalent action to, not directly. This action we have invoked is similar in part to the Magnetic Rail Gun in some ways:

However, we have two Conductors, Two Paths, and Two Currents, each Current travelling in different directions. The Image I have been showing:

is only half the total picture! You need to see our Conductors, Partnered Output Coils, which looks more like:

Now, you get the idea of Balance, we have bought a Symmetry to the Nature of Force. The Symmetry is Natural, we have no part, no intervening, or Supporting role in this Symmetry. We need not supply the Supporting Force!

We have a Naturally occurring Pump! Current A pumps Current B, as Current B pumps Current A.

We are allowing the Natural State of a Current Flow to have its Natural Counter Flow. Thus my Profile Picture of Balance, Hot is to Cold as Cold is to Hot, together as a whole!

Chris

Chris posted this 04 March 2019

My Friends,

I share with you, something I am still learning.

I wish to point out again, there is a Frequency and a Duty Cycle that these effects become observable.

The Height of the Voltage determines the Y Axis, the Inductance, Resistance, and the change in Impedance, determines the Time on the X Axis, that means the Frequency is restricted to the time it takes for the Coils to decrease linearly.

For example:

Unfortunately, I have not been able to accurately calculate these factors! It is closely equivalent to the Neo Magnet falling through the Copper Tube:

So, hey if anyone here is keen to throw out some equations here, we can work through them!

The Time both Coils, with changing Inductance, changing Impedance, and possible loss of DC Resistance, where the Coils become Super Conducting at Room Temperature is very hard to predict. Its a case of look for and coax the effects I have given you.

So, Time is something you need to find.

Voltage is a little more predictable. Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field - Faradays law of Electromagnetic Induction.

I built this calculator to help.

So how do you get the time value? Again, it is trial and error. It will be short, lets start with say 2 Volts input, at a very low Duty Cycle, say 10% or less.

Like I said, some fiddling is required.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 03 March 2019

My Friends,

I have shared with you how I found these effects here.

The method I am sharing, its the Andrey Melnichenko Flashlight method. Used by Graham Gunderson and Tinman.

Don Smith, used the delay in Turn On Time of the HV Diodes:

I have shared with you how The MEG Team did theirs's here. Using a Transient Voltage Suppressors:

@ 15 : 16

I believe plotted incorrectly on either the Y or X Axis.

Other more technical methods can be employed to do the same thing!

### A strong message

So, here, you see: Conduction

By Delaying Conduction in some systems, we can bring about the opportunity for Excessive Currents to Flow, due to the interactions of Opposing Magnetic Fields, much greater than is required to initiate the process! A Voltage is necessary for Current to flow! Ohms Law: I = V / R - many times I have posted this.

Please, take special notes, make sure this does not go wasted, use this and pass this on to all you know.

It is:

• Simple.
• Cheap.
• Very easy to put together!
• You have every single requirement known!

Note: I often make more than one post a day, so please check above for any possible missed posts!

Chris

Chris posted this 03 March 2019

My Friends,

Let me try to define this thread in a single post:

Normal flow of Current in a Parallel Wire when exposed to modulating Magnetic Field and connected to a load:

The goal, this must be bought about, at the right time. Remember this is how Current is amplified:

In The Mr Preva Experiment, we learnt all about how to amplify Current, at Magnetic Resonance! So, the Currents Equal and Opposite are a requirement.

We have just learnt one way to make up for the lost Voltage, and its free, simply just switch! The Voltage Gained, in the form of an Over Voltage, is How Fast this happens, Time Rate of Change.

The Magnetic Fields Slapping Together very fast, create this:

A Voltage, Potential Energy Gained! Holding the Potential Energy, creates this, the Tap for Energy to Flow:

The ONLY way to hold the Potential Energy, is with Partnered Output Coils, Two Coils Bucking, this gives you the Current Gain and the Voltage Potential over Time = Joules! Then Regauge for more Energy, Asymmetrical Regauging!

This thread gives all the answers, all that needs be done is apply the answers!

What we are learning is one way, other ways exist, to make this work! Please don't forget this!

I told you, we truly are Light Years ahead! We just made all the other forums Redundant

Chris

Chris posted this 03 March 2019

All Contributors, all members are important Atti, apologies if I allowed for misunderstanding!

We need contributors to move forward!

There is a lot to be learnt, I am still learning and will never stop!

This thread is super important and a little before its time, my hand was forced, some members here already have this knowledge!

Monitor your Currents, use the Right Hand Grip Rule to show the direction of the Magnetic Field!

Without monitoring your Currents, makes for reduced chances success!

Chris

• Liked by
Atti posted this 03 March 2019

Maybe I just misunderstood you.
No, I'm not giving up. I will continue my work. This is my hobby. My hobby I learn a lot. I know there may be some things and some will never be anything. It will only remain at the level of words.

Jagau posted this 03 March 2019

Hi Atti

stay in the wave

you are a researcher as important as everyone else.

Jagau

• Liked by
Chris posted this 03 March 2019

Atti - Absolutely not!

Let me define a parasite:

A human being that, prays on others, lies, cheats and steals;

A human being coming to read all our hard work, learn from it, take it, claim it as their own, and Patent it, and or, then going on to make money from our hard work, and or, then come back and stop us and others from working on our own work.

A human being that never gives credit to others, when credit is due!

This forum is ours! Our work! We are a collective! The work I have given, I have placed into the Public Domain! Not to be Copyrighted, not to be Patented, not to be owned, never to be sold!

I value all genuine members!

More than you know!

I do also know how some, a small minority, work. I have been subjected to some pretty low deeds in my time, finding it hard to trust anyone! Always a little suspicious, always a little wary. These people, that pray on others, lie cheat and steal, they are Parasites! The ones we work hard to combat!

Hold your head high Atti, for there is a reason I suggested to go back to The Mr Preva Experiment! Incorporating some Diodes in combination with another Capacitor may give you some very important insight!

Look at what Plate is being Charged by what Current!

It is the little things taken for granted that hold the most value!

Ref: My above Post

Don't give up, study closely... Look for and coax the effects I have shared! This thread make's it easy!

Chris

• Liked by
Atti posted this 03 March 2019

Hey Chris.

Do you think I'm a parasite?

Chris posted this 02 March 2019

My Friends,

@Atti - I recommend going back to The Mr Preva Experiment, learn as much as you can there, then come back to this.

@CD - Vidura is right! The direction of Conduction needs to be the same from Zero Degrees to around 93 Degrees.

Remember what I said above, referring to the Parallel Wires in the Transformer shown:

It can be experimentally proven that the Currents and Voltages will have a specific Polarity and Phase that is unchanging between the two Parallel Wires at all points during the Cycle.

It also can be proven that the Currents will be travelling in the same direction at all points during the Cycle. No matter what winding polarity is used - This is the result of the Driven Force Pumping the Current.

### So How Do We Make Our Coils Buck?

While Coil L2, because of the Diode D1, has a continuous Conduction, for one Half Cycle, Coil L3 does not!

X is turned Off at around 93 Degrees, the Mosfet no longer Conducts in the direction it did!

We are Un-Shorting, yes I said Un-Shorting L3 across the Load!

Due to our very well versed Equal and Opposite Law, Diode D2, then Conducts! The Current in Coil L3 is FORCED to Flip Polarity! Bucking! Same as The Mr Preva Experiment!

Remember:

The Energy stored in the Near Field ( Green Magnetic Side) can be used to "Generate" Energy, exactly the same as an Electrical "Generator". There is absolutely no difference!

By interrupting the Conduction at around 93 Degrees on Coil L3, we are allowing the Coils to do something that all Electrical Engineers are taught to strictly avoid, the production of Over Voltages

Also known as Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction!

Remember, I have been showing for a long time:

The Parasitic Induction that Electrical Engineer's get rid of, are the things we want to use! Many years I have been saying this!

### Fact Review

1. We have Coils with a Voltage Potential on the Terminals!
2. We have Coils that have Current Flowing through them!
3. We have Maximum Magnetic Field in the Core!
4. We have, at approximately 93 Degrees, a sudden drop of Conduction of Coil L3.
5. We have, now, Current in one Coil L2, but no Current in Coil L3. But... it can not stay this way!

Two Coils in Magnetic Opposition, Pump Current, we already have the Voltage! Anyone with half a clue can see that this process produces an Over Voltage, all you need do is HOLD the bucking Currents until we need to Regauge again! Yes, Asymmetrical Regauging!

There is no difference to what I am showing you here and Andrey Melnichenko's Flashlight, or Graham Gundersons MIT or the above mentioned Video, shown here again:

Like I said, the unrealised "Gold Nugget". What's 5.65 times more?

Note: Parasites visit our pages, here to scavenge what's not theirs to scavenge, you are the only ones that can stop them! Take and use this, spread this to all your friends, and them, theirs's. Then it becomes worthless for the Parasites to visit!

Note: For this reason, a few details I have left out or been vague on, tried to explain in other ways, if you have followed, read and done the work, you will find them!

There is no rocket science here, I think all here can work the rest out!

Some of the smartest people I know can not workout the simplest things! Because they have not been taught to think for themselves! I encourage you to start thinking on these very simple facts, make for a better world, for us, for our kids and the generations to come well beyond.

Light Up The Darkness!

Chris

• Liked by
Atti posted this 02 March 2019

Hey people.
There is still no good result.
I have tried two types of coils with two types of iron core.
- Has anyone else tried it?
- What is the result?
The drawings and theory are few here. Is there any practice besides?

• Liked by
Vidura posted this 02 March 2019

The currents of L2 and L3 should be in phase at the beginning ( not bucking) and at the peak current the MOSFET have to be switched off this forcing a reversal of current flow in L3(bucking) , so best monitoring would be on L2 and L3. Regards Vidura.

• Liked by
cd_sharp posted this 02 March 2019

Hey, man

Let me see if I understand this correctly. You wrote:

1. Diode D1 Conducts at 0.4 of a Volt.
2. Mosfett is ON, from 0 Volt.
Because of 1 and 2, Currents flow from top to bottom, down the outer legs of the Output Circuit.
3. Peak Cycle, the Mosfett is switched off.
4. A large Over Voltage occurs: The Waves Slap together, creating a Voltage Standing Wave, next is a Current Standing Wave.
5. L3 swings, does a full reversal in Current Flow, D2 Conducts.
Like the Mr Preva Experiment, we now have Currents Flowing Equal and Opposite.

You mean we should be monitoring the input current (through L1) and at "Peak cycle" ( peak input current ) we should switch off the MOSFET. When the new cycle starts (the input current starts growing) we should switch on the MOSFET. Is this what you have in mind?

Currently setting things up.. uC, current sensors..

Thanks

Chris posted this 01 March 2019

My Friends,

Vidura is right, this can make efficiency higher.

In the beginning, after introducing my work for some months, I introduced some Circuits ( 2015-02-01 ):

You will notice the similarity:

Introducing my work, I used a Visual Cue, a Subconscious Trigger, an Indicator, and then, Partnered Output Coils was born!

Visually, we can grasp so many basic requirements!

• One Input Coil.
• Two Output Coils.
• The Output Coils must Buck, Magnetically.
• The turns between the Coils is an important factor.
• The Two Output Coils must have close proximity.
• Coupling Coefficient between the Coils is different.
• The Output Coils have a mutual electrical Connection on each end.
• The other unconnected ends of the Output Coils have more to them.
• And more...

However, before I introduced Partnered Output Coils, the basic concept of using more than One Output Coil, together as a pair of Output Coils, was unheard of, then, others started catching onto the idea of using Two Coils as Output Coils.

We saw a few successes: Brad, ( June 19, 2015 ), who went to the darkside, Graham Gunderson, ( 08-03-2016 ), who almost exactly replicated my previously introduced ideas:

Graham did one of the best demonstrations I have seen, much better than I could have done!

Thanks Graham!

Also many others that do not wish to be known publically, which unfortunately does not help anyone, this defeats the purpose of a Public Forum and sharing publically.

Today, Partnered Output Coils is fairly well known in the Community. This is due to the slow, gradual, introduction of this Critical Technology. Many have little success, only because they do not monitor their Current as I have tried to show for quite some time. If your machine does not Buck at the right time, then all you have is a standard Transformer and possibly much less efficient than a normal one.

The secret is on this thread, you must make your Coils Buck at the right time!

Chris

P.S: A lot of my posts have been tampered with, some forums I used to visit, have modified a portion of the posts I had made, so be careful in what you read and view.

Vidura posted this 01 March 2019

Hey cd, You could use a LC tank circuit on the primary and pulse with DC pulses, although frequency adjustment is more limited, change of capacitor value might be required. Vidura

Chris posted this 01 March 2019

My Friends,

If I may get you all to print this thread, save it offline. Its the most important thread I have posted. The answers you seek are here, some work will be required. You must have a basic understanding of what I have posted in other Threads or none will make sense.

Chris

Chris posted this 28 February 2019

Hey CD,

Any and all experiments can be learned from. Essentially what we are looking at is a DC Pulse in a Sinusoidal shape.

Chris

cd_sharp posted this 28 February 2019

Amazing, man! Can this be done by powering L1 with DC square pulses instead of AC?

Chris posted this 28 February 2019

Hey Atti,

• Where were you switching?
• For how long were you switching?
• Did you monitor your Currents, did they flow in Reverse?
• Did you get the Sawtooth Waveform?

I built a small circuit for this, only good for up to 2Khz, but its a start: Arduino Uni-Polar Parametric Switch - You will need to make necessary adjustments.

To answer the questions I asked you:

• At or close to Peak Cycle.
• For the rest of the Cycle, or with a pulse train of low duty cycle.
• They did flow in Reverse: Bucking as Lenz's Law states.
• Yes, I saw a Linear decrease in Voltage from my Voltage Spike which was twice the amplitude of my initial Voltage.

If you switch on the right side of the Cycle, the Magnetic side, then the Coils will do exactly as I have described. It must be the Magnetic side because: The Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field is how we create Voltage.

Remember Green is GO

### The Cycle of Operation:

The Diode indicates half wave rectified AC Cycle:

In the following circuit:

We have the following operations:

1. Diode D1 Conducts at 0.4 of a Volt.
2. Mosfett is ON, from 0 Volt.
Because of 1 and 2, Currents flow from top to bottom, down the outer legs of the Output Circuit.
3. Peak Cycle, the Mosfett is switched off.
4. A large Over Voltage occurs: The Waves Slap together, creating a Voltage Standing Wave, next is a Current Standing Wave.
5. L3 swings, does a full reversal in Current Flow, D2 Conducts.
Like the Mr Preva Experiment, we now have Currents Flowing Equal and Opposite.

Like dropping a Ball from a 10 storey building, instead of dropping it from your chair. Look for the Reaction!

What's an Over Voltage:

Should look very familiar to all here!

If it does not work this way, then there is something wrong! Keep trying, the full Current reversal only happens on L3. L2's Current does not change. Remember, this is the Natural State, this is how Nature wants two Parallel Wires to react, its Lenz's Law in Action!

Chris

P.S: I encourage safety at all times! Electricity can be dangerous or even lethal! Experiment at your own risk. Please be careful this can be very dangerous.

Atti posted this 28 February 2019

### Learn what happens when Q1 switches at the right time!

I repeated several times. I did not fall into the belly of pleasure. It cannot be said that my fault is a lack of good results.

The effect is quite good, but the power taken from the power supply increases in parallel.

Anyone else?

• Liked by
Chris posted this 27 February 2019

Hey Jagau,

The Transformer I pictured above is from a UPS ( Uninterruptable Power Supply ).

It is the basic idea that Akula used in some of his devices:

More importantly, the idea, the concept I am sharing is critical, it is the simplest way to achieve Above Unity Machines!

I showed above, this is the exact same technique Andrey Melnichenko used in his Lantern, later replicated by Akula:

@All:

If people want:

### with Energy to Spare

then they best learn what' s on this Thread!

### Learn what happens when Q1 switches at the right time!

For years I have been showing the importance of Quarter Wave!

Learn how to OPEN the TAP!

Chris

Jagau posted this 27 February 2019

Hi Chris

I think the transformer pictured above is a CVT or ferroresonant transformer.

The special feature of this transformer is that it produces a constant voltage (CVT) and so it has 7 wires,

two of which are used to place the xfo in ferroresonance.

Jagau

• Liked by
Chris posted this 26 February 2019

My Friends,

If you take note:

It is the little things taken for granted that hold the most value!

The Transformer I showed you in the first post:

There is two sets of Parallel Wires in there, on the Output, or Input depending on what the Transformer is doing. Each set of wires are wound and wired as if the wires are one, like this:

At all stages of the Cycle, the wires hold the same phase and polarity of Voltage and Current.

### UNLESS:

Ferroresonance or nonlinear resonance is a type of resonance in electric circuits which occurs when a circuit containing a nonlinear inductance is fed from a source that has series capacitance, and the circuit is subjected to a disturbance such as opening of a switch.

Ref: Wikipedia

### Ask the Question:

What's going to happen if there is any sort of 'Conduction' issue, like a disconnect, on one of the Coils? The Coils do still have a load connected, but at intermittent intervals. This depends on Polarity and Phase!

X is Switched off at a point in the cycle that the Diode D1 has already Conducted and Coil L2 has a Tension and thus a Current:

Note: Normally each outer leg of the circuit would be in the same Polarity and Phase, described above.

Q1, when on, conducts the same way as the Diode D1, from top to bottom, D2 is the internal Body Diode.

There will be large Transients, Voltage Spikes - Remember Voltage is E.M.F.

E.M.F is time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field and its changing very fast!!! Between the two Output Coils, POC One and POC Two. This is the function of the Internal Diode: D2, this, I have tried to point out for a long time!

NOTE: Normally, in the above circuit both L2 and L3 would be held steady, never changing, so no Transients, no Over Voltages would be aloud to occur. However, this is a goal, we want to bring about this exact circumstance!

Remember, I showed you: May 15, 2015

So we have the ability to use this scenario:

The Voltage spike happens, we then have a Load period, and the Power: ( P ) is generated because: I = V / R

This is such an important post!

Chris

P.S: Disgruntled Trolls are still trying... I am Logging IP's and setting a Honey Trap.

Chris posted this 25 February 2019

My Friends,

More attention to this thread will yield much better results in your experiments! To understand, properly understand this thread will be of great benefit!

It took me many years to gain this very basic understanding! Its truly very simple, it breaks Zero Laws of Science and its extremely cheap and time efficient to Experiment with.

This is one of many ways, but is perhaps the easiest to learn, Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction, Lenz's Law, Conduction, Resistance, Current, Voltage, the basics...

If I may suggest backup and study offline. I am being attacked all angles, Phishing at the moment like I have never seen before, Port Scans, Service attacks. No doubt a disgruntled Troll hired a Nube Hacker. I have never seen this before! I have been in IT for some 21 years, so I know a little about this stuff...

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 24 February 2019

My Friends,

If you have followed, carefully, you will now understand some very important things!

The Coil Un-Shorting Video is a gold nugget, missed by most that do not understand the significance, however, a technique that has been used by many before as was pointed out!

Take our Parallel Wire:

It has been immersed in a Sinusoidally changing Magnetic Field. As was pointed out, the Parallel Wires will carry the same Voltage and same Current at all times if the Driving Force is maintained, but also if the Parallel Wires Tension is not interrupted.

Should you choose to accept it, is to carefully, at very low voltages:

1. Maintain the Tension on both Wires.
2. Interrupt the Conduction on One Wire at peak Cycle.
Note: Both Wires are your Output Coils: Partnered Output Coils.
3. Monitor the action, Voltages and Currents, of the Parallel Wires while Loaded.

In essence, the very definition of Ferro-Resonance is to interrupt Conduction. It is not any sort of Resonance as we would normally coin the term, thus a silly, confusing, and terribly coined phenomena, so one must think outside the box a little.

### A Magnetic Field

Tension is a Voltage and a Voltage across a Load, means we must have a Current flowing. This means we must have a Magnetic Field present before we see our Coils Buck and Excess Energy "Generated".

Think Simple, there truly is zero complication when one understands something. Those that complicate things do not understand what they are looking at!

Chris

NOTE: The above Video can be thought of as a Half Cycle of a Sinusoidal Wave, although there is a difference from sinus and square. The Diode conducts throughout the half cycle, my video does have a few small errors in it. So one must look past the few small things. Notice I showed the Mosfet conducting to make the Currents flow in reverse? Well, here you need to Turn Off the Mosfet to let the Currents flow in reverse!

P.S: I have had terrible issues internally in the last days. I still believe we are being targeted by very high tech Attacks.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 24 February 2019

Truly, if you understand what I am saying in this thread; the world is yours:

One of my videos I have made correlates to this thread:

Yes, I deliberately showed the Timing difference there. Think Reverse!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 21 February 2019

My Friends,

I want to put my explanation out there of how I found this technique.

Many years ago I started a Thread: Reliable and Flexible Switching System - we also have the same thread here, I don't know why I did not link to it, I normally do. The Thread here: Reliable and Flexible Switching System

My builds of the H-Bridge had problems. I was not switching properly at each half cycle, I have a coded Microcontroller that was not sending the correct , or at least the expected clean switching that the Electrical Engineering community expects. So one will get different switching times something like:

Where each signal should be at the same time.

So, my H-Bridges were giving me what is defined in the above quote. A chopped, un stable switching in the system. Even on the Input, I saw effects on the Output. A situation that took me some time to understand. I have shared an example with you before:

Some of my Notes:

I think I have found a way to switch Flux where it becomes resonant at a particular frequency and at resonance uses very little current!

5 Volts Input, Duty is 50%

My resonance Frequency is: 1.208KHz

When in Resonance, it gets very noisy - Before Resonance I use Current, it drops off as I move into Resonance. My meter shows no Current draw, no milliamps

I have a sensing Coil on one leg - Voltage on the Coil goes up showing higher Voltage at resonance as one would expect

Input Voltage becomes nearly Sawtooth, Triangle Wave - but is in-fact Square, H-Bridge Switched DC

*** Found Oscilloscope Earth Clip Lead to Ground is causing effect!
Measured 44.1 ma going to Ground.
Measured: 22.36 ma into Circuit.

The cause of this resonance was a Switching that was not Clean it was Broken.

So, erratic Switching, on top of an already taught tension, creates Transients that we can use.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 21 February 2019

Hey Jagau,

Its not my definition, its the one from Wikipedia, I have shared before here. Also mentioned many other places: here, here, here and here, and others...

The document you shared is very good.

Votes at the top of the page.

Chris

Jagau posted this 21 February 2019

Hi Chris

100% agree with your new definition, the words ''openning of a switch''  makes it more refined.

p.s. i dont see any button to vote?

Jagau

• Liked by
Chris posted this 21 February 2019

I hope all wishing to learn and build these devices reads this thread. It is a very important thread, containing a lot of very important bits of information.

Again, I don't like the term, however the definition for Ferro-Resonance is:

Ferroresonance or nonlinear resonance is a type of resonance in electric circuits which occurs when a circuit containing a nonlinear inductance is fed from a source that has series capacitance, and the circuit is subjected to a disturbance such as opening of a switch.

Ref: Wikipedia

Circuits, pseudo circuits, all of which contain value. The world is in your hands:

Oh, don't forget to vote, lets see how well you understand this thread.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 20 February 2019

It is amazing, when we let the Tension go, by a Conduction Disruption, we get:

Parallel Wires Buck. It is their Natural State. They oppose when Electrical Energy is "Generated", but the Voltage must be greater then your initial Voltage.

We have covered this before, The Lorentz Force.

Chris

Chris posted this 19 February 2019

Graham Gunderson also explains:

Chris

Chris posted this 18 February 2019

Aloha is correct,

A certain Potential must be reached. But this potential reached must be on the Output Coils.

I point out again:

Where the Red area is Power Output, as Voltage decreases, the Current also decreases, Voltage and Current are in phase so V x I = P = Joules per second = Tap where the Voltage Potential is the catalyst for Current to be pumped, to flow.

Again, this is not the only way, but is perhaps the best way to learn.

Chris

alohalaoha posted this 18 February 2019

Bucking effect has threshold due to magnetic coupling and other Etheric properties.

It means with low power excitation you will get nothing.

Also bucking effect has shown yourself with aircored coils. Again he has threshold, you need to rise power excitation.

Make high inductance coils, with as high as possible mag.fields. 2-3 coil windings is not enough. I am prety sure that effect also exist in nano scale, but you need DSO woth 500uV vertical resolution to verify this.

There have been experimental results of 34 times AU. It means with 24V pulse you will get 800V hv pulse when all conditions are meet.

Again coil geometry affect bucking coils coupling. They need to be free movable for the 1st time untill effect has caught.

Good luck at hunt for the blue bird.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 18 February 2019

My Friends,

A Background: An Existing Waveform gives Tension on the Wires, where Current is flowing. This we saw in the above video, seen again below:

These Coils were shorted until Peak Voltage, a Short is equivalent to loading the Coils with a Zero Resistance Load. This means maximum Current is Flowing in the Coils!

Then, by Un-Shorting the Coils into a Load, a Delay in Conduction, The Coils are then forced to move into a Natural State. The Currents Slapping together, into each other, vary fast! Several hundreds of Nanoseconds!

We can see, from top Arrow to Bottom Arrow, a full Flip in Current Polarity:

The Coils, now one Negative Current one Positive Current, during this process, we see a large Voltage gained: 5.65 times the initial Voltage in the above Video, very simple...

The Currents are then the same as The Mr Preva Experiment.

Chris

Chris posted this 18 February 2019

My Friends,

Every single recent Above Unity Machine recently seen shows Spikes on top of Waves, four examples I have shown on this thread alone.

• What is the Spike doing?
• Why on top of a wave?
• What is achieved by introducing a Spike to an existing waveform?

I have given you the answers:

1.  A CHANGE in Current Creates a Voltage / E.M.F.
2. The Mr Preva Experiment is not Above Unity because too much Voltage is lost.
3. I have stated: "You need to get the Voltage Up".

In Two Parallel Wires, If they are wound into a Coil, on a Former, they are caring a Current. This Current is a Driven Current. Drop ONE of the Coils Conductivity, with a reverse Diode, at peak Voltage - Watch the Transient Voltage Created as the Currents Flip very Fast.

Remind you of the very fast CURRENT FLIP of another device?

It should!

Chris

Chris posted this 18 February 2019

My Friends,

So, we know and can see, it is the Change in Magnetic Field that creates an E.M.F or "Generates" a Voltage.

We saw above, a Tension is held on, shorted, the Coils in the Video, they are shorted until half Cycle. Then they are un-shorted, we see the Coils are subjected to very large Voltages ( 5.65 time more ). Again here:

I have made reference to this for a long time, many here know this already, its fairly basic Electronics, the problem is, most everyone is trained to get rid of it, not explore and investigate this, one example is this video:

An Electrical Engineer that knows what he is looking at, but is trained to ignore and get rid of this problem called parasitic-Inductance. We see it everywhere:

• What's the Title of this Thread?
• What do we see in this Image?
• What's the Result of Current changing very fast in Trace One?
• What's the Result of a Short across Trace Two at Peak Voltage?
• What's the Result of a Short, at peak Voltage of both Traces?

If you use common sense, with what I have done the best I can to share, then a much larger picture, I hope will be forming! I have tried to explain in this video:

You need to catch the wave, with clever timing and Magnetic Field Effects, building a Voltage that can then be used to put the Magnetic Field under Pressure, you can Pump Current, and the result is a Sawtooth Wave form.

Again:

The Thread: Impulse Pressure Wave, particularly Jagau's post in the pdf document on Ferro-Resonance, also describes these effects.

Ref: My Post Here.

I don't like the term "Ferroresonance", but I do want to be as accurate as I can.

Let the System do what nature wants it to do, catch the wave, let the Currents Flow in reverse. Bucking, creating a Voltage Potential that we can hold onto for as long as we can.

The Impulse Pressure Wave thread describes some of what's going on here.

In The Mr Preva Experiment, the question I asked: How do we get the Voltage Up? Why so much of a drop?

You know now, how to do it.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 17 February 2019

@Jagau

Yes a core is required, at least this is what I believe for maximum coupling of the Coils. If the coils are not coupled to each other properly, then this effect is much reduced.

@Atti

Very nice replication! Thank you for taking the time to look at this!

What Cap voltage were you able to sustain?

"What's next" = probe your currents, see what your currents are doing.

Chris

• Liked by
Atti posted this 17 February 2019

There are some thoughts on the shape of the above layout sign. Obviously, it does not matter where the shape of the signal is measured.
What we relate to. Not only this, but also in another arrangement, is this measured signal shape. For parametric amplifiers or ferro-resonance transformers, if the diode capacitor is coupled. The shape of the pumping signal is added. Or the load.
However, the following question arises:
- Does the power supply have less power or more?
- Does the recorded power fall or decrease?
-what's next ?

Jagau posted this 17 February 2019

Hi Chris

In my first assertion I forgot to mention that the ferromagnetic material has a direct function in the result

with an aircore it does not work.

And in your question: the diode has a very low voltage conduction in the other direction,

an avalanche effect can occur in the diode.

Jagau

• Liked by
Chris posted this 17 February 2019

My Friends,

Another shot, what do we see?

Marked in Red, this is almost 0.5 of a Volt, this is Diode Conduction.

Yellow trace is On time. Red Trace is the Ve+ on the cap, it is currently reverse charging, but why? Have I messed up the circuit. Its a tiny bit different but not much. I will let you figure it out.

Triangles, on charge and also on discharge, why and how?

Does this make any more sense now:

I hope you can see the correlation, the how's and whys. If not, replicate what I am showing you, look for these effects and use what I have posted here to increase these effects.

All from this little Circuit, or a slight variant of it:

The challenge to keep a constant charge on the Cap: Successful

So, how can I keep a -1.3 Volts mean on the Cap when the Cap is shorted? What's going on to keep a Capacitor charged when it is effectively shorted?

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 17 February 2019

My Friends,

Regarding the above Experiment,  I will give you a Clue:

The Frequency is: 203Hz at 50%Duty Cycle. 1 / 203 = 0.00492610837 seconds which = 1 / 0.00492610837 = 203.00Hz, at 1ms per division, we see: 1,2,3,4,5 nearly 5 divisions, which equals: 0.005. The reading of: 3.40KHz is not the Run Frequency.

@Jagau - I agree, it is easy to show. Coils do work, when Magnetic Resonance is found, and the Terminal Voltage is sufficient, amazing things happen! Thanks for sharing my friend!

Chris

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 17 February 2019

My friends

there is a verifiable fact:

At the time of the abrupt disappearance of the electric and magnetic field in a set of coils in P.O.C.

at the zero point between the two coils there is a phenomenon that we are looking for, there is a pumping effect coming from the environment (aether) and lasts only a fraction of a second,

the frequency at which the pump works is intimately linked to the resonance frequency.

The result of several experiments proves this fact.

Jagau

Chris posted this 17 February 2019

My Friends,

I get the feeling there is a bit of confusion here?

An experiment:

OK, a very simple circuit. Inductor L1 is being switched at a rate of 100Hz and 50% Duty Cycle. Capacitor C1 is charges by Inductor L2, through the Diode D1, however we have the Inductor L3 shorted across Capacitor C1, so a logical assumption would be, the cap will never charge, its being discharged at a faster rate than it is being charged.

1. All coils are exactly the same.
2. All coils have the same Coupling and Mutual Coupling to each other.
3. We can change Frequency and Duty Cycle.

The goal is to keep a constant charge on the cap at as high a Voltage as possible.

Can this be done?

Chris

Chris posted this 16 February 2019

My Friends,

It makes me laugh!

While the Super Numpty's else where debate for days on end: "Dose it take power to create a magnetic field", here we are actually showing, critical, key information on Energy Machines! Critical, Key information, you can only find here.

Moving on:

A piece of Insulated Copper Wire is an amazing, very advanced piece of machinery! Electrical Energy can not pass the Insulation Boundary, yet the Copper Conductor is among some of the most Conductive Elements we know of. Copper ( Cu ), is the standard at which we base our Conductivity standards:

Copper is the standard by which electrical materials are rated and conductivity ratings are expressed as a relative measurement to copper. These ratings will frequently be expressed as "28 IACS". IACS is the abbreviation for International Annealed Copper Standard and the number preceding "IACS" is the percentage of conductivity a material has relative to copper, which is considered to be 100% conductive. This does not mean that copper has no resistance (is 100% conductive in an absolute sense), but rather that it is the standard by which other materials are measured. The higher the % IACS, the more conductive the material is. This standard refers to a pure, "standard" copper having a resistivity of 1.7241 microhm-cm at 20°C (68°F).

Ref: https://www.bluesea.com/resources/108/Electrical_Conductivity_of_Materials

Remember, Conductivity ( G ) is equal to 1 / Resistance ( R ), Resistance is defined as the ratio of Voltage ( V ) to Current ( I ) through a Resistive Element, just pointed out, the Conductance ( G ) is the inverse of the Resistance ( R ). Mathematically:

R  = V / I

G = I / V = 1 / R

For a wide variety of materials and conditions, V and I are directly proportional to each other, and therefore R and G are constants (although they will depend on the size and shape of the object, the material it is made of, and other factors like temperature or strain). This proportionality is called Ohm's law, and materials that satisfy it are called ohmic materials.

In our application, we use Strain, Stress, Pressure, thus Resistance ( R ) is not a constant! So we have a: "Differential Resistance", actually, Impedance changes in Time. This is my: Reduced Impedance Effect.

Strain, or Stress is something we have been told about:

We all know already, Magnetic Fields Oppose, Current Adds, the Current is a Standing Wave of at least twice the singular potential. We are pumping the Current, we have an Electromagnetic Pump:

Where, Charge ( Cyan Ball ) directly associated with the Copper Atom Cu, is Charge under Acceleration.

Using the trick explained in the above posts, 5.65 times, it can be very much higher.

Remember, it is the Change in the Magnetic Field that "Generates" a Voltage.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 16 February 2019

My Friends,

This thread is soon becoming one of the most important threads here on this forum.

Time ( t ), time is a critical factor, it is a dependant factor in Electrical Energy; which is defined as Joules ( J ) per second. One Watt Hour ( Wh ) is: Joules ( J ) per second x 3600, because there is 3600 seconds in one hour. So, one Watt Hour ( Wh ) is equal to 3600 Joules ( J )

So, the "Generation" of Energy, is time dependant.

Lets observe this image in some detail:

You can see, we have Triangles in the Blue Waveform, clearly seen:

In the Blue Waveform, we see there is a line up of the Spikes, I have marked this in Red. These Triangles are the same as I have pointed out above:

This is where the Coils build up a Potential, this "Generates" Current, the Pump, the Tap is open for a Flow. Currents are Equal and Opposite. Lenz's Law, a Natural State, a state that Nature requires for a System to come back to Equilibrium. A closer look:

Its hard to see in a Sinusoidal System, DC Pulsing is a lot easier to see what's going on. Lets listen to one example:

Lets look at two examples:

Many times we have seen examples of this Triangle Waveform, its the same as I have described here:

As long as we have a Voltage on the Y Axis, we have a Pump that can Pump Current for the time indicated on the X Axis.

All we need do, is create the Voltage, its Asymmetrical Regauging, described as:

Right here we see not just one, but four examples...

Chris

P.S: Some of my videos have been removed from YouTube and there is no explanation why.

Chris posted this 15 February 2019

My Friends,

This concept of "Parallel Wire" is important.

I showed in my thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT that the Currents, measured in a Parallel manner, did not have to be the same. Using the bottom Measurement Block/PCB:

Which can be thought of as:

Parallel Wires of length X.

Yet the Voltage and Current can be in very different directions depending on the situation created by us, this is a case of:

Two men pushing their Carts, one with 100Kg's of Apples, one with 100Kg's of Oranges, one at the top of the hill, the other at the bottom of the hill.

The Carts are connected via a huge rubber band at the top of the hill via a pully (Lenz's Law)

The man at the top of the hill lets go...

Bodies in motion, Kinetic Energy, Force ( f ) = Mass ( m ) x Acceleration ( a ) ( f = m ⋅ a )

Remember what the greatest man that ever lived said:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason; it has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. - Nikola Tesla "Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency" (February 1892)

I want to make a point of saying, our Input only creates a Voltage Potential on the Coils. This Voltage Potential can be manipulated, via switching, to create a greater Voltage Potential. If you like, a Transient or Spike. This is entirely a trick or an artefact of the switching Potentials shown above:

### ***   5.65 times the Voltage of the initial Change in Magnetic Field   ***

Greater Voltage Potential can then be used to simulate the Magnet falling through the Copper Tube, as we have a Magnetic Field, and its Changing in time:

NOTE: The Copper Tube is our Output Coils, Partnered Output Coils, each Coil, via switching, can be Shorted ( Loaded ), as shown in the Copper Tube Experiment above. One man s Cart going up the Hill, the other going down the hill:

If the Copper Tube has a cut all the way down one side, the Copper Tube would not exhibit the same reduced speed effects on the Magnet. This is open Circuit, there is no effects of Lenz's Law. This Experiment is shown in a slightly different way here:

What I am pointing out, again, its just a trick, the greats have used to increase the Output Voltage Potential. E.G: Andrey Melnichenko Flashlight Circuit:

Its one way, not the only way.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 15 February 2019

A Coil with no Voltage Potential can carry no Current.

Is Current "Generated", or is Voltage "Generated"?

What is the term "Generating", attempting to define? What is "Generation", in the terms of an Electrical Generator.

We have such a vague view of what's truly going on. Voltage can be present on the Terminals of the Coil in a "Generator", but we can have zero Current! Current only flows when we load the Coil! So a logical mind must give the two quantity's a very distinct separation!

At the same time, they have a close relationship.

A change in Current can "Generate" a Voltage. The faster the change, the greater the Voltage "Generated"... Current is analogous to the Magnetic Field.

A Current can only flow if there is a difference in Voltage on the Terminals. The greater the Voltage Potential, the greater the Current. Seen as an Ohms Law equation: I = V / R.

Current is a quantity that's defined as Electrons per second, so if one wanted to fill a bucket with electrons, the Tap would need to be running for as long as is required to fill the bucket.

This means the Pump must be running, and as long as there is a Voltage Potential, there can be a flow of Current.

So, Current is a quantity that requires Pumping, this is seen as Lenz's Law, equal and opposite, however, nothing states that this equal and opposite is required to oppose your Input! This is a false assumption we automatically infer.

An inference which is our own limitation in Science.

I have proven this to be a false assumption here: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT

So, if we have a Voltage, we switch in the Pump at the right time, then we Pump Current as long as there is a Voltage and the higher the Voltage, the longer the Pump can run due to the fact that the pump is under pressure as long as there is a Voltage:

Why is the young man running? What happens to him next?

Simply, our Pump is Opposing Magnetic Fields! Partnered Output Coils.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 13 February 2019

My Friends,

On the same topic, of Timing, to increase the Voltage Potential on the Terminals, using the Magnetic Field Interactions between two Coils.

We find that we need a method to do this efficiently, but also at the right time. Sometimes these Coil Interactions are very hard to see what's going on!

Akula gave us scope images like so:

All from a little circuit like so:

Remember, this was a Circuit of Andrey Melnichenko! Not Akula, Akula replicated this work!

When the Fields Slap Together, we see Magnetic Interactions that first of all increase Potential, Voltage, and then as a result, Current is also increased because:

### I = V / R

By increasing Voltage ( V ) by 5.65 times, as in the above example, we also increase Current ( I ) by 5.65 times because Resistance ( R ) stays the same!

Ohms Law, its real and it does work as is stated when dealing with Electric Phenomena. Electric Phenomena is completely subject to Magnetic Fields! Take a single wire:

Where, Charge ( Cyan Ball ) directly associated with the Copper Atom Cu, is Charge under Acceleration.

Listen very closely:

Now, from Floyd Sweet:

The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitudes.

As polarity may be maintained constant, that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process.

It’s obvious, we have a self-regulation machine whose inherent conservation to the nth degree.

When the Magnetic Fields Oppose each other, which is defined by Lenz's Law, Current is Pumped, its a function of Loading the Coils in the right polarity as is pointed out.

Those of us that have been around for a while will already know most of this stuff.

The point is, the Voltage Potential on the Terminals is Important and it is required to be increased, all by Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction.

Chris

Chris posted this 13 February 2019

My Friends,

I want to point out, if you're waiting to buy these machines from market, it will never happen. At least in the near future!

The only way is to learn and then build your own. I have no intention of selling machines, I know I will not get that far! Please, Build your own.

I have updated the above Quotes as required.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 13 February 2019

Hey Vidura,

Sorry I didn't see your post until I refreshed and reposted.

Hey Chris and all I have made the test with coilshortening vs. unshortening with my pulsmotor and came to the same result , I didn't switch at sinepeak, which would be better, but the result was very similar, anyway with the unshortening technique the drag on the rotor was strongest. In my tests there was no sign of excess energy, which would be only possible if the standing magnetic waves can be phased for regenerative acceleration, which is the tricky part of our work, this also applies for transformer devices. But basically a huge power boost is possible with this approach. Regards Vidura.

Yes you are right!

You will notice, the Rotor speed slowed and also the current went up, at the same time the battery voltage went down. This indicated Load on the Rotor.

This is because of the Shorted Coils. Then at peak, not seen on the scope at the time, the Coils are then Un-Shorted.

Remember the diagram we have been looking at:

Green is the GO part. We must not load the Input, the Red part of the Cycle is as Don Smith told us: "A Heat Death"

When we don't Load the Input, we can let the Input do its work.

Then we can make the Partnered Output Coils do their own work, as an Electron Pump. Accelerating Electrons Using Magnetic Fields as a Pump!

Chris

Chris posted this 13 February 2019

So:

Did anyone take notice of the Terminal Voltage of 5.65 times Voltage Gain?

This is a trick that's been done many times in History! Andrey MelnichenkoRoman KarnaukhovRuslan Kulabuhov and many others.

Graham Gunderson did exactly the same thing as is explained in my last post:

Now where did that 700 Volt Spike come from? Ah Ha, yes we know! Magnetic Field manipulation, to get the Terminal Voltage up, without having to do anything special that costs us a lot of power to do so!

Take this pseudo circuit:

Yes, the Mosfets have internal diodes.

The terminal marked ( X ) has a signal applied, say at 375 Hz with a Duty Cycle of 3%. It is just enough to get this working.

As ( X ) moves into an off state, the Polarity of the Coils Flips, the diode D1 Conducts, and as this happens, we might send say a pulse train of 1Khz with a 1% Duty Cycle to Q2's gate ( Y ).

Are we going to achieve the same result as we got above? Are we going to see a Voltage increase on the Terminals?

If not why?

Chris

Vidura posted this 13 February 2019

Hey Chris and all I have made the test with coilshortening vs. unshortening with my pulsmotor and came to the same result , I didn't switch at sinepeak, which would be better, but the result was very similar, anyway with the unshortening technique the drag on the rotor was strongest. In my tests there was no sign of excess energy, which would be only possible if the standing magnetic waves can be phased for regenerative acceleration, which is the tricky part of our work, this also applies for transformer devices. But basically a huge potential boost is possible with this approach. Regards Vidura.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 13 February 2019

### Fact:

The "Generation" of Electrical Energy, Joules per second, inside the Electrical "Generator", inside an Insulated Copper Conductor, must have, at least Two Magnetic Fields Present, Equal and Opposite. This is Lenz Law.

Zanzal kindly shared a video some time back, Coil Shorting vs Coil UnShorting.

Now, there is a message in this video. Look at the facts! Look at what was said and shown in the video.

1. Voltage: 12.41.
2. Amperage: 2.45.
3. RPM: 779.1.

This gave a Peak to Peak Voltage of around: 76 Volts, 76 * 0.707 = 58.59 RMS Volts.

### Coil Shorting:

1. Voltage: 12.40.
2. Amperage: 2.40.
3. RPM: 778.3.

Giving a peak to peak voltage of 192.0 Volts. However because the wave is now no longer sinusoidal we can not use the 0.707 calculation. The 680uF 200V Capacitor is not charged in a particular time frame, an accurate calculation would be hard to estimate. It was written it was "Very slow charging"

### Coil Un-Shorting:

1. Voltage: 12.37.
2. Amperage: 2.85.
3. RPM: 751.4.

NOW, we see a very big difference: 430.0 Volts Peak to Peak.

#### 5.65 times more than the first measurement?

We surely must see a very important pattern here! It was written: "Very Fast 680uF 200V Cap Charging". The Rotor is slightly slower, so the Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Fields, on the Rotor, is slower. However we see a much greater Voltage Produced - WHY?

The Magnetic Fields of the Two Coils are Interacting in such a way, via Timing, to Slap together very hard and very fast!

So we have a Standing wave, a very high potential build, but the Coils themselves MUST be forced to Oppose! The Currents in the Coils must travel in opposing Directions! Cap Charges Much Faster! Because more Energy is being "Generated" - Current Charges Capacitors, not Voltage, so it is the Current flowing in the Coils has been dramatically increased - How? By Magnetic Fields Interacting together in such a way that the High Potential gained, and the Interactions of the Coils act exactly the same as we saw in The Mr Preva Experiment, in my thread: Some Coils buck and some Coils DONT, its part of the entire luxury of knowing how this all works.

So, I urge you, especially the builders, Build, replicate these effects, its all possible on a solid state unit, very small in comparison. Replicate variants of YoElMiCrO's Circuits:

At the time of Zanzal posting the Video, I did post a Pseudo Circuit, to simulate the Coil Un-Shorting convention between two Coils:

Of course looking at this now with fresh eyes, the Diode needs to be on the top rail, to stop the Cap from reverse charging.

Remember, replicate the Effects, then it is very easy to improve on these effects. If you look at numbers, you will fail, its inevitable, because all you see is Failure. Where as if you look for the effects, you can only succeed, then one day, you will look up and say: "No Way!"

Then the numbers will talk!

Chris

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 27 January 2019

All these systems operate on the basis of standing and traveling waves.
It is necessary first to catch the motion of particles in the coil.

From a resonant system, which does not require effort from the source, we can produce more energy than we provide.

Don Smith used high voltage at resonance, floyd sweet used motinal E fields with magnets and Tesla used longitudinal waves.

Jagau

• Liked by
Chris posted this 26 January 2019

My Friends,

When the Magnetic Fields Slap together, we see the same effect we get in The Mr Preva Experiment, we get Magnetic Fields Buck, Oppose, and the Currents are Amplified, we also get Voltage Amplified, if the Fields Slap together Hard enough.

I ask you, if you wish to make that step forward, this experiment can prove very beneficial!

Chris

P.S: Your Partnered Output Coils do not have to be Parallel Wires, bifilar Coils. They can be individual spaced Coils, only wired in Parallel. An analogy used, Parallel Wires is to get the idea, the Coils orientation correct.

• Liked by
Members Online:

No one online at the moment

Since Nov 27 2018
Our Above Unity Machines:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Start Here:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).