# Increasing the Rate of Kinetic Energy

• Topic Is Sticky
• 1.9K Views
• Last Post 04 September 2018
Chris posted this 08 April 2018

My Friends, I have shown in my Thread: Some Coils Buck and Some Coils DONT that I can change the Rate of Kinetic Energy at no extra cost at the Source - A huge deal for anyone that knows Science!

I have seen very little interest in this topic, and I am dismayed to be honest as the possibilities moving forward are not just astounding, but World Changing!

So what is Kinetic Energy and why did Nikola Tesla make such a big deal about it?

The definition of Kinetic Energy is:

In physics, the kinetic energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion. It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes.

Newtons Laws of Motion: F = m · a

Kinetic Energy is Current, Charge in Motion! This is the ability to do Work! What is Work?

The Definition of Work is:

in physics, measure of energy transfer that occurs when an object is moved over a distance by an external force at least part of which is applied in the direction of the displacement.

Newtons Laws of Motion: S = V · δt

Displacement (S) is equal to the Velocity (V times the change in Time (t)), normally in Meters per second.

Torque is where real Horse Power is noticed today, the definition for Torque is:

a force that tends to cause rotation.

Newtons Laws of Motion: T = F · r · sin( θ )

The unit for Torque is newton metre (N⋅m) or the unit joule per radian. The unit newton metre is denoted by N⋅m or N m.

So you can see we are seeing real Horse power now, Newton Meter, or Joule per Radian, Watts is also a measure of Force, the definition of Joule is

A unit of work or energy, equal to the work done by a force of one newton when its point of application moves one metre in the direction of action of the force, equivalent to one 3600th of a watt-hour.

The Joule (J) is equal to the energy transferred to (or work done on) an object when a force of one newton acts on that object in the direction of its motion through a distance of one metre (1 newton metre or N⋅m).

From Newtons Laws of Motion we see most of our common Units of Energy Derived!

One Joule (J) is equal to one Watt Second (W) which is the Product of Voltage and Current V · I = W, and if sinusoidal wave forms have a Phase Angle greater than Zero, then a cos( θ ) adjustment will be required.

Simply put, more V · I = more Joules, more Energy, more Work, more Force, more Torque, because we are increasing the Rate of Kinetic Energy which directly relates to Current, the Motion of Charge and to increase I even further, we can very easily increase V because I = V / R and the Resistance of the Wire will be negligible, to zero, due to my already shown Zero Impedance Effect (P.14 Guidelines to Bucking Coils).

I plan to release a lot more, but you need to show that you have replicated and understood, recommended and my existing works:

When I see people have caught up and are actively sharing their work with others, I will also share more and give more data.

Chris

Jagau posted this 08 April 2018

.H Chris

Impressive!

Yes you touched the mile. Searches must be co-ordinated in the same direction in order to draw on the overunity. I just read your thread on ''some coils buck some dont '', which is the most interesting thread I read on aboveunity.com.The title did not tell me much but when I read it wow.

I have to understand '' somes coils buck some dont '' give me a little time to understand everything and in addition it gave me a lot of ideas!

In your research on coils, you are much more advanced than me. Honestly I understand very well electronics but the subtlety of your research is to study and understand because we are not all at the same level of experimentation.

Wow, I do not know where to start?

Yes, I understood Mr Prevna's experience very well and checked it and that is exactly what Floyd Sweet in his paper '' The Space-Flux Coupled Alternator '' Negative electrons flowing to the left contribute to the current flowing to the right.

We must keep in mind that the current is the movement of electrons in order to understand this fact.

When I have understood the first part I will do the experiment that you have proposed and one thing is certain I will reply.

Jack

• Liked by
Chris posted this 08 April 2018

Hi Jack - This is great! Thank You!

My friend, you are completely correct:

We must keep in mind that the current is the movement of electrons in order to understand this fact.

Current which is, as we currently understand it, Force, or Kinetic Energy, bodies in Motion, truly is the key to this entire subject!

Some here have done The Mr Preva Experiment, CD_Sharp, Wistiti, Zanzal, all have done a great job!

The following is a general post, for all readers.

The great push for Understanding, learning whats going on and what the Cause and Effect is is critical, Magnetic Fields, and what Moving Charge does in Magnetic Fields...

A Charge has Spin, and because there is a charge, on the charged particle, it has an associated Magnetic Moment, meaning the Charge is susceptible to external Magnetic Fields, and with the correct polarisation, these charges can be accelerated, a concept not new to science, the Magnetron has been doing this for more than 100 years.

### Electromagnetic Induction is incomplete!

Science does not have the full picture, there is a huge and fantastic HOLE! Once this Hole is identified and seen, one can see where the real boundaries are and make huge steps ahead!

Listen to your inner Voice, it Guides you!

I have had Electrical Engineer's, friends for 10+ years, tell me I was wrong, my theory was wrong, but when I show them my experiments, their jaws drop to the ground and they have nothing to say, entirely lost for words and they get angry with me! Can you believe it, my friends, get angry with me for showing them something that they should be amazed at!

### Replications

For all here, if they are happy to post and have comments on their replications, then I am more than happy to comment on them! I do however have one rule, I do try not to change ones path, if one is not working on Partnered Output Coils, then I try to make an effort to not interfere and let the experiments be, live and let live!

My deepest respect to all here for their work and efforts, I do not wish to disturb others progress in other areas!

However, I only know of ONE way to break the Unity Boundary, and that is with Partnered Output Coils - If people want it, then grasp it and I will help where I can!

### Understanding

Please remember, I also am learning, I have stated many times: 'I am a Student of Life, always will be!' But, at the same time  feel I have something to share!

I have commented many times before, a Demonstration will not help. The reason for this, is, understanding. We have seen many demonstrations in the past and very few to none have been replicated.

My goals, require me to monitor how many are studding, watching videos and reading posts, more importantly how many are coming to this new understanding! Seeing things for what they really are!

Understanding how to Amplify Current and Voltage, and their relationships together is more important than anything else!

We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.

My Friends, your'e all, awesome!

Chris

Chris posted this 09 April 2018

We all like to learn, and learning should not ever be something that should be subjected to excessive criticism or unjust harassment by anyone!

I have learnt in my time, that there is always something that can be learnt in every situation!

Engineers spend much of their time attempting to reduce or eliminate Parasitic Inductance's and Parasitic Capacitance's. The following video is one example of Parasitic Inductance:

### Question:

Can anything be learned here?

Yes, behaviour is judged by others, and also, just as important, where does the Amplitude on the Oscilloscope come from? That's right, excess Electromagnetic Induction! Can this be capitalised on? Yes, Should it be something that should be learned from and not taken for granted, or eliminated? Yes!

### Learning when one can:

The very thing science has spent so many years attempting to get rid of, is the very thing the world has been searching for!

When one learns to see things for what they are, things become clearer, more obvious!

Electromagnetic Induction is incomplete! It only predicts E.M.F or Electromotive Force, commonly known as Voltage. Both the same things!

Electromagnetic Induction Does not predict Current! In fact, it does not have anything at all to do with current, entirely missing Current full stop!

Ohms Law gives us an estimation of the value of Current with the equation: Current (I) = Voltage (V) / Resistance (R)

So we see a relationship, but this is incomplete, a massive HOLE, because it does not predict the Rate of the Charged Particles! A Huge Hole is missing here!

### What is Electromagnetic Induction:

The Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field in the proximity of a Conductor produces a E.M.F, Electromotive Force or a Voltage as is pointed out, but the Rate of Current as I have shown, and the first person to show in History as far as I know, can be modified!

The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 Ampere = 6.24 x 1018 Electrons / second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes.

Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field. Thus a conductor that formerly had a temperature rise above ambient labelled as a factor of 10 would now operate at a temperature of 1.0. Thus the same gauge wire would carry 10 times more current at the same temperature.

And:

The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitudes.

As polarity may be maintained constant, that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process.

It’s obvious, we have a self-regulation machine whose inherent conservation to the nth degree.

### Moving Charge:

Once Charge, either Electron's or Ion's are moving, they exhibit their own Magnetic Field, at the same time they are subject to External Magnetic Fields! As we already know from the Magnetron, the charges can be Accelerated, or Decelerated with the correct External Magnetic Field Polarisation!

This means, the Rate, the Change in Charge over the Change in Time can be increased or decreased!

This is what I have shown, in my Thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT

Measuring and closely observing Current vs Turns Direction is a very important key step in learning more about this Technology! I use what I call Measurement Blocks, I built them specifically for making this task easy:

The Voltage Drop across a 0.1 Ohm Metal Strip Resistor, pictured above, and using Ohms Law, because its awesome, makes measuring and observing Current very easy and very accurate!

I also have these:

When Currents oppose, which means Magnetic Fields Oppose, the Electrons and Ions can be Accelerated, all at no extra cost to your Input!

Chris

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 09 April 2018

Very good idea these measurement block.

Bourns makes excellent product of quality and precision.

Is the current sensor of Bourns too?

I do not read well on the block I think ending by 1F?

Jack

..

.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 09 April 2018

Hi Jack, I am sorry, I am not quite understanding, please correct me If I do not answer your question!

On my measurement Blocks I have used a Through Hole Metal Strip Current Sensing Resistor, CSR or sometimes a CVR Current Viewing Resistor: See Datasheet

The Voltage Drop across this Resistor (0.1 Ohms ±1%) is the Current in the Circuit. The basic schematic is as follows:

The Voltage Drop across R1 is the Current, Ohms Law.

Hope this helps.

Chris

Jagau posted this 10 April 2018

ok Chris thank you This is the information I missed

I go back to my experience in my lab

Jack

• Liked by
Chris posted this 12 April 2018

For everyone's convenience, I have created a thread: Current Observation and Measurement

This should help in the furthering of Current observations and measurement!

Chris

• Liked by
Deny posted this 13 April 2018

Hello everybody, I would like to introduce myself I am Daniel and I have been following your forum for quite a time now I have been reading all the posts and making some experiments for some time I have no professional education in the field but I have been learning everyday for a few years and it is just something I do in my free time. I would like to share something with you guys and please tell me right away if it was stupid of me I do not have the equipment you have or the experience I am just a basic guy . This is something I have been playng with but its realy hard to make it work.

Is just a simple circuit consisting of 2n2222 transistor one diode, hand wound coil in the pot core and a 470uf cap. The circuit can run the led for a few minutes on the good usable brightnes and I thought it was interesting and I wanted to ask you if it is aomething useful or it is just a piece of junk Thank you very much for all your hard work you are great and I want to help to make the difference the world needs. Daniel

• Liked by
Chris posted this 13 April 2018

Hey Daniel, welcome and thanks for sharing!

Fantastic Work! Well done!

Every step forward is a step forward we didn't have yesterday!  Every experiment has value, where one or more people can learn from it.

Draw up a circuit, list your components, ensure your Cap is not a Super Cap, and document it up as best you can. This will become important as time goes on!

Also, a very small current may be injected from your signal gen, just something to be aware of.

I see a great experiment in your videos! Well done!

Chris

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 13 April 2018

The circuit can run the led for a few minutes on the good usable brightnes and I thought it was interesting and I wanted to ask you if it is aomething useful or it is just a piece of junk

Hey Daniel, welcome. Its like Chris said, its a step toward useful knowledge. This is not a process where a recipe is right or wrong rather you have to keep exploring things that you think are useful.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 14 April 2018

Kinetic Energy, the Motion of Bodies containing Mass, therefore velocity, is the same as Charge Flowing in an Insulated Copper Conductor!

Electrons and Ions have Mass, when they move, they are now considered Kinetic Energy.

Floyd Sweet just has a way with words:

We now have, when the current and voltage windings are excited, another set of fields virtually in quadrature with the fields (alternating) initiated by the load current flowing in the power phase coils. The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitude.

As polarity may be maintained constant , that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, and at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for The conversion process. It’s obvious; we have a self-regulating machine whose inherent magnetic properties will provide energy conversion conservation to the Nth degree.

The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges.

Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway.

Beauty, a way with words!

Chris

Chris posted this 15 April 2018

My Friends,

I consider this thread as another important thread! Its a helper thread for: Some Coils Buck and Some Coils DONT

I posted, some time ago, the Integral components of Power - missed by many!

An oscilloscope takes discrete measurements in Time, this is called Sample Rate:

The Sample Rate, takes measurements on each scope channel, very fast, remember this is a Time Based Measurement, Samples per Second, also, Watts, Voltage Current and the Phase of V and I is Power over Time! Watt Seconds! - A very Intimate Time Relationship!

The Intimate Time Relationship, or Integration of, can be seen as the area, rectangles under the Curve:

Sample Rate, where Rate is Quantity over Time! Increasing the Rate of Kinetic Energy, is also increasing the Kinetic Energy over Time, and doing it, at no extra cost to the input, or at no extra cost to the Prime Mover, is of Massive Importance!

This means, Energy Over Time can be increased!

An Integration, can mean, more Energy over Time, than was initially required to start this process! Power Gains! I show these concepts in my Thread: Some Coils Buck and Some Coils DONT

### A Hole in Electromagnetic Induction

The holiest of HOLES, what is it?

Floyd Sweet pointed out, with great detail, giving rise to the question of Current Rate:

The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done,  conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

Electromagnetic Induction needs to be extended! It must contain at least two different parts!

### Electromotive Force (E.M.F)

Most all of us know this part of Electromagnetic Induction! Voltage is Induced by the Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field.

EQ: 1

### Magnetomotive Force (M.M.F)

The Magnetomotive Force, or the Current ( I ) through Turns ( N ), known as Ampere Turns ( At , and the Rate of Change over Time of this Kinetic Energy, is entirely missing from Electromagnetic Induction!

As previously pointed out, Current has its own Rate: Charged Particles moving from Point P1 to P2 over Time t, or 6.24 x 1018 Electrons per Second -The Rate of Charge Flowing, Current, known as Amperes!

There exists, another very Important Rate, missed entirely by Science:

Please Note: I am unsure of the completeness, the best I have to describe this is:

EQ: 2

My Friends, this is an extension of Ohms Law, with a Time Component added, This gives us the Rate of Kinetic Energy, where:

• dV is the Change in Voltage.
• R is the Resistance of the Circuit (can be Zero or negative).
• dt is the change in Time.

My Friends, this is ground breaking, if my Math is, and if I am correct. Please remember, I am not always correct and I will always say if I am not sure, but this is my best to date, this is ground breaking. I believe there may be an Inductance Component also, where Inductance L may also play a role. At times Inductance can also be Zero!

Remembering, Voltage is Potential Energy, it is not Work, its the Potential for Kinetic Energy, not the Kinetic Energy itself!

As I have shown in my Video: Timing - Partnered Output Coils DC Switched - Aboveunity is here!

The Rate of Kinetic Energy, Current, can be increased over time, like I have shown here:

No extra Cost on the Input, the input is entirely unaffected by these different Coil Configurations, yet we see a very big difference from the first image to the last image in the Area Under the Curve!

As I have very clearly pointed out, this relationship is due to several factors, the Induced Voltage ( V ) on the Terminals, the Resistance ( R ) over the course of Time ( t ).

This increased Rate of Kinetic Energy over Time is Free, it costs us nothing on the Input!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 17 April 2018

My Friends,

If you keep in mind, our Technology, and apply the very same key fundamental techniques in the following video, what I am trying to explain will become more obvious:

Key Notes:

• Magnetic Field and Charge motion are Orthogonal, at right angles.
• The Charge gains Energy, accelerating, gaining Velocity, F = m · a
• The invariant Mass ( m ) of an Electron is approximately 9.109 × 10 − 31 kilograms
• The Acceleration ( a ) is increasing! Force ( F ) is also increasing!
• The Charge must have Velocity, and an External Force, to Gain Velocity!
• With our Technology, the External Force is Bucking Magnetic Fields!

Another example, The Magnetron is similar, but older!

We have seen this example before!  The Lorentz Force, is the reason this occurs. Floyd Sweet gave us the Magic:

We now have, when the current and voltage winding's are excited, another set of fields, virtually in quadrature with the alternating fields initiated by the load current flowing in the power phase coils. The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitudes.

As polarity may be maintained constant, that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for the conversion process.

It’s obvious, we have a self-regulation machine whose inherent conservation to the nth degree.

As did Don Smith:

Ah, the devices I have invented, which there are a number of them, they all, ah, actually, accelerate Electrons. Theyre Electron Accelerators.

Don Smith 1998 Office Interview Part 3 @3: 30

It really does help to think in terms of Electrons, Ions and Accelerating them! Charged Particles are subject to External Forces!

Remember, all these Charged Particles are resident, they live in the Copper Atoms! Remember, Copper Atom consists of: 29 Protons, 34 Neutrons and 29 Electrons, for each Atom! Billions and billions of Atoms in a single piece of Insulated Copper Wire, which is a Wave Guide!

One of the best Videos I have found, to attempt to visualise the Flow of Current inside a Insulated Copper Wire, is:

Far from a perfect example, and getting the meaning of Faraday's Law wrong, it does still help!

I hope this helps some!

Chris

• Liked by
Marathonman posted this 17 April 2018

Chris;

I do love your work and you are ahead of most in your work but saying electrons comes from the copper then flow in it is a fallacy of man.  if electrons comes from the wire then in two second all the energy in the wire would be gone. saying it flows in the wire then saying it is a wave guide is a contradiction of terms even though you are right it is a wave guide and the waves travel on the outside of the wire. i tend to agree with Eric Dollard and his assumptions.

J.J. Thompson who theorized the electron in 1897 said it was 1000 times smaller than an atom but never said it came from copper wire. being 1000 times smaller than an atom and the fact that many, many people have stated that the Ether is 1000 times smaller than an atom and 32 times more dense than that of lead would suggest that an electron is actually the Ether it's self.

also sense there is no energy in matter as it attains it from the environment as does every living thing on earth  we would have to be connected to a copper wire to live.

I posted a PDF on magnetism that will explain the reasons for electric flow in the first place as it is the best description i have ever heard in my life. the end of the PDF is mind blowing.

as i said i do respect you as a man and your work but saying electrons comes from wire, i am sorry i tend to disagree.

very respectfully,

Marathonman

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 17 April 2018

.

Hey MM

Respectfully, what was written was only a flawed example. It could have taken any other electrons metal carrier free to move with a voltage. Copper is only an example and in its last video the example of the ionised water is only another example of a help to VISUALIZATION OF ELECTRON CIRCULATION.

That's how I perceived his message.

JACK

• Liked by
Marathonman posted this 17 April 2018

Sounds good to me.

Marathonman

• Liked by
Chris posted this 17 April 2018

Yes, appologies, the example I gave was a generalisation.

Of course, all Atoms have Electrons Protons and Neutrons.

Electrons Pop in and out of existence, part of this process is called Beta Decay, this is where the Electron decays into a Neutrino, and Anti-Neutrino pair and a Photon is emitted

As you have pointed out, neutrinos are abundant everywhere and pass right through all known matter today..Many excellent video documentary's exist, well worth studding.

So yes, your'e right MM, Energy exists throughout all space, but re; the subject matter, Insulated Copper Wire Coils, the Electrons are Formed and move as Free Electrons, in other words, outer orbital electrons, Electron Hopping, and I believe the movement of them will one day be proved to be is a helical, or a threaded movement down the Wire.

### Electron Hole - Paul Dirac

Where a Electron Hole exists, an Free Electrons in motion can fill this Electron Hole. The definition of the Electrom Hole is as follows:

In physics, chemistry, and electronic engineering, an electron hole (often simply called a hole) is the lack of an electron at a position where one could exist in an atom or atomic lattice. Since in a normal atom or crystal lattice the negative charge of the electrons is balanced by the positive charge of the atomic nuclei, the absence of an electron leaves a net positive charge at the hole's location. Holes in a metal or semiconductor crystal lattice can move through the lattice as electrons can, and act similarly to positively-charged particles. They play an important role in the operation of semiconductor devices such as transistors, diodes and integrated circuits. However they are not actually particles, but rather quasiparticles; they are different from the positron, which is the antiparticle of the electron. (See also Dirac Sea.)

The Conductivity of a Conductor is the fundamental ability for Electrons to move, and the Conductivity ( K ) is represented by:

### K = 1 / R

Where R is the Resistance, which is sensible when one thinks about it. The Resistance to moving Particles or the Promotion of Charged Particles to move. One is the opposite of the other.

I see that so many seem to forget the importance of the Conductor, lets go one further, whats the definition of a Super Conductor?

A superconductor is a metal that allows electricity to pass through it without resistance

So we see intimate relationships with these fundamental concepts. As we Free more Electrons from the Atom's Orbitals the Resistance is lowered, more Electrons can Flow, the Resistance is reduced, effectively putting the Coils into a Super-Conducting State!

#### Resistance!

At Room Temperature! Yes, a fantastic and amazing fact, the Coils have either Zero Resistance or even Negative Resistance!

Yes, WOW is the word! The Atom is the most amazing thing!

An Article that may blow the readers mind: Resonant Standing Waves Comprise the Electron

Where else do we see patterns like this? Water, as a droplet drops into still Water?

We truly are Light Years ahead of the other Forums! Its our ability to ask questions, question understanding and our will to learn!

Chris

Marathonman posted this 17 April 2018

That was much better my friend, outstanding post.

Marathonman

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 24 April 2018

My Friends, I have shown in my Thread: Some Coils Buck and Some Coils DONT that I can change the Rate of Kinetic Energy at no extra cost at the Source - A huge deal for anyone that knows Science!

Thanks for pushing this Chris, I'm starting to make progress in understanding what you are getting at. I appreciate it.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 24 April 2018

Hey Zanzal,

This  is great to hear!

An Analogy: Water Pumps are measured in several ways

• Litres per-minute ( lpm )
• Gallons per-minute ( gpm )
• Cubic Feet per-minute ( cfm )
• Cubic Meter per-hour ( cmh )

To pump more water, we need a pump that is rated with a high volumetric flow rate. 7 cmh is greater than 3 cmh.

Our Coils are doing the same thing. The more:

• Turns ( N )
• Magnetic Field ( B )
• Cross Sectional Area ( CSA )
• Voltage Induced on the Output Terminals ( V )

The better our machine will work, mostly anyway. Too much of anything, you know the old tale! Lets not be too greedy, we don't want to tear a hole in the fabric of the Space Time Continuum - Not sure how many sewing machines would be needed to fix that!

I urge all readers - Remember:

Remember what the greats before us said:

The underlying principal (forget Millikan’s experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases. Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it’s time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces. Once this is done,  conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway. To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

We now have, when the current and voltage windings are excited, another set of fields virtually in quadrature with the fields (alternating) initiated by the load current flowing in the power phase coils. The current and voltage initiating fields are in such a direction to either accelerate or decelerate the rate of flow of charges depending on the applied polarity and voltage amplitude.

As polarity may be maintained constant , that polarity of acceleration should be chosen so charges move at faster rates, lowering copper duty factor, and at the same time opening the gates wider so more coherent field entities may enter for The conversion process. It’s obvious; we have a self-regulating machine whose inherent magnetic properties will provide energy conversion conservation to the Nth degree.

The devices I have invented, which there are a number of them, they all, actually, accelerate Electrons. They're Electron Accelerators.

Don Smith 1998 Office Interview Part 3 @3: 30

The information is there, we only need make sense of it. We know so much, the interactions of Coils, two Coils, at the same time, Magnetic Fields, and the Current, in the Coils, does Work on the Electrons, in the Conductor, the insulated Copper Wire, of the Coils, two of them, to free more Electrons, to make more Electrons Flow: Increasing the Rate at which Electrons can Flow!

We are building a Electron Pump, this, already stated by T. H. Moray:

An electrical generator is, in the true sense, not a generator, as it does not create electrical energy. Electricity is not made by the generator, it is merely pumped. From that standpoint, an electric generator might be referred to as an electric pump and the Moray radiant energy device as a high-speed electron oscillating device.

The generators that now furnish our electric power do not create or originate any power or electricity; they merely direct "pump" the existing energy or electricity. In other words, so far as this is now concerned, electricity has always existed.

We speak of generating electricity: To be exact, we only transfer it from one place to another (pump it, if you please). We cannot generate it because we can neither destroy or create it. After we have used it to light our homes or do other work, it is like water over the wheel — no less water, only the lowering of potential. The electricity has "sunk back" from whence it came, ready and waiting for nature or man to raise its potential, when it again is ready to do man's bidding, or in other words in the evolution of energy it "sinks back" to its source. It is naturally very slowly but steadily being liberated from the universe only to return again.

Chris

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 24 April 2018

I'm currently reading Moray's "THE SEA OF ENERGY IN WHICH THE EARTH FLOATS." There is a lot of great stuff in here. Example:

When a resilient substance is subjected to strain and then set free, one of two things may happen. The substance may slowly recover from the strain and gradually attain its natural state, or the elastic recoil may carry it past its position of equilibrium, and cause it to execute a series of oscillations. Something of the same sort may also occur when an electrified capacitor is discharged. In ordinary language there may be a continuous flow of electricity in one direction till the discharge is completed, or an oscillating discharge may occur — that is, the first flow may be succeeded by a back-rush, as if the first discharge had overrun itself and something like recoil had set in. The capacitor thus becomes more or less charged again in the opposite sense, and a second discharge occurs, accompanied by a second back-rush, the oscillation going on till all the energy is either radiated or used up in heating the conductors or performing other work.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 25 April 2018

T. H. Moray also mentions the word: "Accelerate" in various forms 6 times!

Since the stoppage of comet like ions in an encounter with oppositely charged ions occurs well within the limits of atomic magnitude, 10-8 cm., so that the acceleration will be of the order of U2 /2t=1026 egs., and the force needed to drop even a single electron will be 1/10 dyne. The power to stop and neutralize such electrons flying with 1/30 of the speed of light inside a molecular thickness can be estimated.

The system is modified in conformity to the concept that chemical reactions must take place when the oppositely charged molecular ions from an appropriate activated catalyst are accelerated against one another in the wire corona, it consists of a cylinder made of a suitable catalyst from which positive atomic ions are emitted.

As these negative molecular ions are accelerated at the right angles to the wire in the direction of the electric field toward the positively charged catalyst cyclinder, they are met by an avalanche of on rushing atomic ions from the catalyst.

These positive molecular ions are accelerated back into the field and collide against the negative molecular ions coming from the direction of the negative electrode corona.

Electrons in motion go to constitute an electric current. What electricity is to matter, so is electric force to common mechanical force, and electrical inertia to mechanical inertia. By inertia, we mean the ratio of force to acceleration.

Sometimes only a few operated as required by the CRITICAL Balance and combined SYNCHRONOUS Resonance action called four to accelerate with the magnetic: fields in the Universe.

Now, because we know, Force ( F ) = Mass ( m ) · Acceleration ( a ), and Mr Moray was clearly getting to a point of gaining Acceleration, and the subject matter was Electrons and Ions, the very subject matter we are focusing on, then we can draw a very conclusive, grand, conclusion, along with all the supporting Data, above, with experimental proof, The Mr Preva Experiment and my supporting experiments, that we have found a Door Way that can be taken advantage of!

If only people made this subject their main goal, and followed the Bread Crumbs we have laid out so delicately, we would see many more successes!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 26 April 2018

The following quote I have missed until now:

The electrical prime mover, the socalled electric generator or the Moray energy oscillator all have the same scientific facts.

T. H. Moray - P.31 The Sea of Energy in which the Earth floats.

and now it has become one of my favourites! Logic, common sense, and it is exactly the same as I have said for so many years!

When one truly knows how to "Generate" electrical Energy, one will realise that the common Electrical "Generator" is far from complete!

To Pump Electrons, they must be put under a Stress, a Force, Bucking Magnetic Fields do exactly this! Potentials can be increased!

Open this door, more and more, and one will realise no unity boundary Exists!

The only boundary you are limited to are the boundaries you allow yourselves to be limited by! Push every Boundary!

Chris

• Liked by
Marathonman posted this 26 April 2018

well put.

Marathonman

• Liked by
onepower posted this 26 April 2018

Quote: 'Electrons in motion go to constitute an electric current. What electricity is to matter, so is electric force to common mechanical force, and electrical inertia to mechanical inertia. By inertia, we mean the ratio of force to acceleration"

I would agree there must be mechanical equivalency, as above so below, if our notions of forces, flows and the conservation of things are to hold true. In fact we were taught all particles and there associated fields are in perpetual motion which we call thermo(thermos,theme,heat)dynamics(dynamis,power).Thus if reason must prevail then everything everywhere we know must inherently be in perpetual motion as a norm.

"...and considering the constant tendency of the mind to rest on an assumption, and, when it answers every present purpose, to forget that it is an assumption, we ought to remember that it, in such cases, becomes a prejudice, and inevitably interferes, more or less, with clearsighted judgment.", Michael Faraday.

As Moray implied, simply pumping electrons around in closed loops as is our tendency in no way implies an act of "generation" or normalcy. Generation implies the production of something, production a transformation, transformation a change in form. Aristotle's term for form(forma) was to morphe from one characteristic to another.

Thus we come full circle...to truly generate is to transform and not to pump electrons around in closed loops. To generate is to transform the inherent motion latent within matter as field oscillations into coherent motion through the coordination of forces within matter which as Tesla implied is induced through external agents... ie radiant energy. Radiant energy from a trillion galaxies each filled with trillions of stars and each star not unlike our own Sun supposedly radiating more energy in one minute than all of mankind has utilized in it's entire existence.

Energy crisis?... I see no energy crisis I see a failure to understand the fact we are floating in a sea of energy. Not unlike a fish in the middle of an ocean dying of thirst. It would seem to me the crisis is that very few understand what energy is.

Chris posted this 26 April 2018

Hey MM,

I am still holding Mr Figurea's Quote very high also!

PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION - Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion, is that the turns of the induced circuit approaches and moves away from the magnetic centers of the inductor magnet or electromagnets, and those turns, while spinning, go through sections of the magnetic field of different power, because, while this has its maximum attraction in the center of the core of each electromagnet, this action will weaken as the induced is separated from the center of the electromagnet, to increase again, when the induced is approaching the center of another electromagnet with opposite sign to the first one.

Because we all know that the effects that are manifested when a closed circuit approaches and moves away from a magnetic center are the same as when, this circuit being still and motionless, the magnetic field is increased and reduced in intensity; since any variation , occurring in the flow traversing a circuit is producing electrical induced current .It was considered the possibility of building a machine that would work, not in the principle of movement, as do the current dynamos, but using the principle of increase and decrease, this is the variation of the power of the magnetic field, or the electrical current which produces it.

The voltage from the total current of the current dynamos is the sum of partial induced currents born in each one of the turns of the induced. Therefore it matters little to these induced currents if they were obtained by the turning of the induced, or by the variation of the magnetic flux that runs through them; but in the first case, a greater source of mechanical work than obtained electricity is required, and in the second case, the force necessary to achieve the variation of flux is so insignificant that it can be derived without any inconvenience, from the one supplied by the machine. Until the present no machine based on this principle has been applied yet to the production of large electrical currents, and which among other advantages, has suppressed any necessity for motion and therefore the force needed to produce it.

The indepth study of the Generator was also undertaken by Gabriel Kron, the inventor of the Network Analyzer. Most everyone knows this already.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 26 April 2018

GG is that you?

Hello and welcome Onepower!

I would agree there must be mechanical equivalency, as above so below, if our notions of forces, flows and the conservation of things are to hold true. In fact we were taught all particles and there associated fields are in perpetual motion which we call thermo(thermos,theme,heat)dynamics(dynamis,power).Thus if reason must prevail then everything everywhere we know must inherently be in perpetual motion as a norm.

Agreed, we know this to be true! Clearly you are a man of the same mind as I!

"...and considering the constant tendency of the mind to rest on an assumption, and, when it answers every present purpose, to forget that it is an assumption, we ought to remember that it, in such cases, becomes a prejudice, and inevitably interferes, more or less, with clearsighted judgment.", Michael Faraday.

Truly Humanitys most dangerous mindset, assumptions! When one is sure of something, even when it may not be, we must still remain open to new possibilities! Experiment opens doors, doors lead to new possibilities!

As Moray implied, simply pumping electrons around in closed loops as is our tendency in no way implies an act of "generation" or normalcy. Generation implies the production of something, production a transformation, transformation a change in form. Aristotle's term for form(forma) was to morphe from one characteristic to another.

Again, I agree, wise men, wise quotes! Today we say we measure Current, a specified Rate of Electrons, where the Terminal Voltage Difference, is supposed to define the Current Flow. Yes if we move Electrons, leaving Holes, what must fill these Holes?

Transformation or the ability for a formation of one to another, as you point out, morphe, is apparent throuout Nature!

Thus we come full circle...to truly generate is to transform and not to pump electrons around in closed loops. To generate is to transform the inherent motion latent within matter as field oscillations into coherent motion through the coordination of forces within matter which as Tesla implied is induced through external agents... ie radiant energy. Radiant energy from a trillion galaxies each filled with trillions of stars and each star not unlike our own Sun supposedly radiating more energy in one minute than all of mankind has utilized in it's entire existence.

For the reasons of simplicity, Science, and ability for others to easily learn, I have not used terms that leave open definitions, at least where possible. We do however have Energy throughout all space and all Time, for Time is the domain of Energy! Space is the medium for Time to traverse!

Our observations of coherency in unified Charge rates may well be entirely wrong, as a one dimensional ruler is not ideal for two dimensional space. We are bound by our ability to observe what we are able, and to learn where we can. No matter, what we know today, tomorrow could lead us to new and fantastic observations!

Energy crisis?... I see no energy crisis I see a failure to understand the fact we are floating in a sea of energy. Not unlike a fish in the middle of an ocean dying of thirst. It would seem to me the crisis is that very few understand what energy is.

For well over 100 years we have been told, a select few listened, passing the baton on, as understanding was not achieved, while some may have had had some success along the way.

Any and all Crises, are a manufactured conundrum, a cash machine, for the System, where a select few always benefit, always!

Energy is abundant, Life is abundant, Air is abundant, Water abundant, Abundance is the opportunity for control. Then Crisis leaves room for profit!

It is true, the people must take this abundance and stop Control of it, the only way for this to occur is to Learn, Build and Pay it Forward! We must have majority of people able to share this abundance! Paid for their time, but not greedy as to attempt to create Crisis, not again!

A great post, thank you Onepower!

Chris

Jagau posted this 26 April 2018

Hey onepower

you are the master thought for me today.

''a fish in the middle of an ocean that dies of thirst''

It meets exactly what I already said in a previous post.I would like to quote one of those who have managed to connect to the immense energy that emerges around us

'' look what emerges from the 408 mhz through our galaxy ''

For those who have the opportunity to verify this I can tell you that it is not only at this frequency that energy is available.

Thank you to this site to express yourself freely!

Jagau

• Liked by
onepower posted this 26 April 2018

On increasing kinetic energy there are many simple experiments one can perform which relate to Moray's energy within oscillations.

In one experiment we can use an iron core coil attached to an oscilloscope and a permanent magnet. If we move the magnet past the coil we see a slow sine wave which most are familiar with. In fact we can move the permanent magnet past our coil in any number of ways and the result is generally always the same. From this one might assume there is nothing new we can learn here however this is not always the case.

Now if we place the permanent magnet on our bench and lower the coil with it's iron core from above so the magnet jumps to the core something different happens.We see a rise in potential as the magnet approaches the coil core as expected and when the magnet strikes the coil face we see a spike in potential then a long series or train of oscillations independent of the external motion of the magnet itself.

Something so simple, a moment in time at our bench when a coil of wire wrapped around an iron core and a magnet does something we did not expect. One could then ask where did these extra oscillations come from?, where did the energy to sustain these independent trains of oscillations come from?. In retrospect we find the magnetic field is inseparable from the physical material which carries the magnetic field. As such if the physical material oscillates within itself in this case as a standing pressure wave in the metal lattice then so must the magnetic field. As above so below...

We could also note these independent oscillations running into many kilohertz have no direct relationship with the physical motion of the magnet itself as a whole. We assumed a direct relationship was present and always applied however as we can see this is not always the case. it would seem the phenomena in question relates more to sound waves or vibrations within the material itself rather than simply whirling magnets past coils of wire. I suspect Moray used similar phenomena within his devices which would explain why so few could understand the principal of operation.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 26 April 2018

Energy, Nature's Powerhouse:

The term Science has taken, to "Generate" Energy truly is violating the Conservation of Energy! Energy can not be Created or Destroyed!

I have said before, Sub Atomic Particles pop in and out of existence, a debate rages now changing the terminology, sub atomic particles are now localised or delocalised. Truly, the particle is either there or it is not!

It is commonly known, and makes sense, that an Atom goes through a change when, an Electron is lost.

Important Note: We do not see the disappearance of Mass over Time, we actually have evidence to say over Time Mass gains Mass, gets bigger!

Electrons are gained, in the following process:

Science will not tell you where the Free Electron comes from, they refuse to give detail on how this Electron just Popped into Existence! Remember Conservation of Energy, Energy can not be Created nor destroyed!

Important Note: Atoms, Mass containing Atoms, with Electrons, have been in existence for many Billions of Years according to Science! The Atom just keeps Spinning along! A continual exchange of Energy, Gains and Losses, never Imploding or Exploding! Sustained, perpetually!

When a Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino collide, they lack charge to form an Electron, science passes this by, and they say it cant occur. However, the Atom itself has a Net Charge greater, either negative or positive, Electrostatics states Charge must balance...

In reverse, Electrons Decay, called Beta Decay, into a Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Pair and emit a Photon at the same time. So where has billions of years of lost Electrons gone?

We are One with Our Symbiotic Universe!

The above video, gives an answer to the appearance of a Free Electron.

As Onepower kindly pointed out, everything Morph's, it transforms into one or another, Energy never lost, Energy never Gained, only ever Transformed. Humanity's ability to access the Electron, to bring about a Current, a flow of Electrons, is to access the Subatomic processes of Universal Balance!

Truly, there is no such thing as "Generation" there is only Transformation!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 26 April 2018

@Onepower - Mechanical also applied to Atomic, or Lattice Resonance.

The Damping of Resonance must be accounted for. Today we really only know of Frequency / Duty Cycle adjustment, commonly known as a PLL Circuit, Phase Locked Loop Circuit, to account for the Change in applied Load.

Resonance is very easily lost, as it is further Damped. This I know you already know.

We have gone one step further, we have Load Balanced Loop, or more commonly known as Feed Back and Feed Forward to account for the damping problem. An old technique, resurrected and re-purposed.

As the potential is bought up, the potential for Current to flow, there exists, an open Door, where Energy over Time can be increased well beyond the determined Rate. The machine is forced to respond, the Flow of Electrons, Current.

This Door opens further as the Potential is increased.

Very simple, we expend very little to bring Potential Up, The System is forced to respond, Current Flow results. As Mr Moray stated:

Electricity is vibrations. Substance is a vibrating medium. All substances are really combinations of one primordial substance i.e. vibrations. Electrons in motion go to constitute an electric current. What electricity is to matter, so is electric force to common mechanical force, and electrical inertia to mechanical inertia. By inertia, we mean the ratio of force to acceleration.

Force, the ability to do work: Gravity Pump ( Zero User Input ) COP = ∞

Water Force, gravity, runs the above machine indefinitely, until failure or Water loss.

Electrical "Generators" work the same way, the Lorentz Force is the Force that Pumps Electrons, and the Lorentz Force is a controllable Magnetic Force.

The electrical prime mover, the socalled electric generator or the Moray energy oscillator all have the same scientific facts.

T. H. Moray - P.31 The Sea of Energy in which the Earth floats.

We truly are Light Years ahead of all other forums!

Chris

P.S: Another outstanding Post Thank You!

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 27 April 2018

We have gone one step further, we have Load Balanced Loop, or more commonly known as Feed Back and Feed Forward to account for the damping problem. An old technique, resurrected and re-purposed.

Hey Chris,

Can you elaborate is this something important we should understand? (I don't know what you are referring too.)

As the potential is bought up, the potential for Current to flow, there exists, an open Door, where Energy over Time can be increased well beyond the determined Rate. The machine is forced to respond, the Flow of Electrons, Current.

This Door opens further as the Potential is increased.

Very simple, we expend very little to bring Potential Up, The System is forced to respond, Current Flow results.

Yep and the proof for this is found in the equation for capacitor joules, C/2*V^2 where C is the capacitance and V is voltage. The potential energy is greatly enhanced by an increase in voltage, not so much by an increase in capacitance, yet if you use a 220V source to charge a 100uF capacitor to 200V while at the same time through a separate path you charge 2200uF capacitor you will see that when your 100uF capacitor has 200V your 2200uF capacitor has 22.9V.

The difference in potential energy is enormous with the 100uF far exceeding the 2200uF, but guess which one used more electricity? The 2200uF used many times more power over the same time period because as the 100uF quickly approached the source voltage it charged slower using less power.

Here is a simulation in case anyone would like to see this: Capacitor Charging Simulation

• Liked by
Chris posted this 27 April 2018

Hey Zanzal,

I went a little far, not meant to confuse, apologies.

Basically, what I refer to as a 'Load Balanced Loop' is the Counter Balancing of, what we could call the Damping Forces, which in our case is the Loading of the Magnetic Field moving in the System, meaning, the fact I have shown Zero Lenz's Reflection on the Source. Of course Damping is more than this, being Resistance and so on, but you get the idea.

I will create a thread on this in the near future! It will become much clearer soon.

Awesome Simulation Zanzal! Thank you for sharing!

Chris

• Liked by
TESLETIC posted this 27 April 2018

Sorry guys I am not here to debunk anything just to release my gut feeling about this witch is I think it is bogus ! Meaning the atom and electrons as remember it is only a THEORY !? As NO BRANCH OF SCIENCE HAS EVER EXPLAINED STATIC FORCE !? ; ) http://www.teslapower.rocks/

onepower posted this 27 April 2018

Zanzal

Quote: "We have gone one step further, we have Load Balanced Loop, or more commonly known as Feed Back and Feed Forward to account for the damping problem. An old technique, resurrected and re-purposed."

I also use similar techniques and it is important to see the big picture.

Suppose we have a single current loop and we say the energy present in any form is uniformly distributed over our loop. Now we take a second loop which is said to be induced by the first and produces an induced current through mutual induction. This would seem to be normal to most until we introduce more advanced concepts...the concept is everything.

We should understand in order for the above to happen a partial current having a partial energy must be present in every given section of the first loop. Induction energy must also be present in the space between said loops at any given instant in time, energy in translation. Now we could theorize of what might happen if we removed a section of the first loop having a partial energy while energy was already in translation and inserted the first section into the second loop.

We now have two discrete transformations present, a first partial conductor which carries a partial energy with it as a conduction current now present in the second loop and the energy from the first loop in translation to the second loop. Now we could ask a question... if the induction energy is said to be in translation in between the first loop and the second how would it know part of the first loop is now in the second?.

Reason would suggest the energy in translation is fundamentally different than the condition or qualities which created said energy due to the transformation.

Never underestimate the inherent value of a good thought experiment.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 27 April 2018

Sorry guys I am not here to debunk anything just to release my gut feeling about this witch is I think it is bogus ! Meaning the atom and electrons as remember it is only a THEORY !? As NO BRANCH OF SCIENCE HAS EVER EXPLAINED STATIC FORCE !? ; )

Hey Tesletic,

Electrostatics and Electrodynamics differ simply because a single key factor, this being Time ( t ). A very famous man once said:

The easiest circumstance to treat is one in which nothing depends on the time—called the static case.

Many say Electrostatics is incomplete, and they are correct in saying so, most do not know what parts are in complete. Now you know what completes the equation from Electrostatics to Electrodynamics.

It is true, however, we do still have a general incompleteness to both fields, neither is complete, but we do have a good baseline to build on!

Time is the Energy Domain, all Energy resides in the Time Domain, for what we see as an Energy Transformation today, may very well be seen as an Energy Transformation again Tomorrow! That is, of course, if we had the ability to tag and track individual Transformations and observe the complete Transformations from one second to the next!

Nature is our Teacher, the best Teacher makes their students think for themselves, I quote on my website: "only three of the creations as is given, matter force and mind" - Mind, one of the three creations given, astounding isn't it!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 27 April 2018

...

Onepower - You are exactly correct!

The so called Parasitic Inductance problem is Natures Natural response to Universal Balance and the Inverse Square Law is Natures way of bringing Balance to Force at a Distance! The Direction and Magnitude of a Force is always restricted, a Friction if you will, by a Force with Opposite Direction and equal Magnitude, at least for the Electromagnetic Force.

The Space between each Source Force is a polarised medium, oppositely, from each Source separated in Space, this polarisation is instantaneous, changing in time with the change in Force.

If the Force is shifted, meaning if the Response of the Force is redirected, in this polarised space, then we have the ability to Shield the Response back on the Source, or originating Force!

My Experiment shows this exact situation, we have, if you will, shielded the originating Source, the originating Source is not affected, and at the same time we can use this Tertiary Source Force as a new Source that we would other wise have not had!

Effectively, my Pendulum swings freely, but I still have Currents Flowing!

Lenz's Law, a Forced Response, to Natures, Will to Balance, or to bring Equilibrium to, Force.

The Primary Source's Magnetic Field Lines do not ever cross the Conductive Windings of the Secondary Source, and the opposite is true: The Secondary Source's Magnetic Field Lines do not ever cross the Conductive Windings of the Primary Source!  There is a defined Boundary, at least from all experiments to date.

This boundary is the difference in Polarisation of the space between the two different Source Forces.

While it may sound like we are getting off topic, these interactions are very Important to understand! For the Electrons, that Flow, in the Conductor, Insulated Copper Wire, are the Magnetomotive Force that is at the heart of the originating Source Force! Kinetic Energy, Electrons having Mass, Forced to Accelerate. The System is Regauging between States, or Oscillating.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 28 April 2018

Today, for some, the will to learn and evolve is just too strong, for others, not so...

Evidence provides a push for understanding. One of the three things given, your Mind, can do with this evidence what you will. After all, reality, our Universe, a Bubbling Calderon of continual exchanges, and our understanding of it, gives rise to the very machine you are reading this text from now!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 28 April 2018

The way we Humans think of Current, or invoking Current, the Flow of Electrons in an Insulated Copper Conductor, is flawed.

Rushing at a task with the biggest possible Hammer, the Brute Force approach, is a flawed Approach!

Take for example, the Magnet in the Copper Tube Experiment:

What are we observing?

• The Copper Tube represents a single Turn ( N = 1 ), of very large gauge Copper Wire.
• The Single Turn ( N = 1 ) is a Short Circuit, representing Maximum possible Current Flow.
• Placing the Magnet into a position above the Copper Tube is the only work required by us, to Start the Machine.
• Gravity acting on the Magnet is the Secondary Source Force, pushing the magnet Downward.
• The Copper Tube, because Current is Flowing, is the Tertiary Source Force, the Friction if you will.
• Each Source Force has Opposite Direction and equal Magnitude, dissipation allows the magnet to Fall at a slowed rate!
• Notice we have put Zero Current into this system, its an Action Reaction and Counter-Reaction process!
• Action:
• Place the Magnet, then drop it.
• Reaction:
• Gravity adds Velocity, downward to the Magnet. A Changing Magnetic Field in Time.
• Counter-Reaction:
• The Copper Tube Counter-Reacts with an Opposing Force slowing the Rate at which the magnet Falls. Also a Changing Magnetic Field in Time.
• The Rate at which the magnet falls is the regulated rate of Current flowing to the Force applied Downward.
• The Current in the System is not determined by Us Cranking a Handle! We apply Zero Force!

We could use this set of observations to learn from. Applying a Potential to a System could be deemed as "Action" Process. For example, we place the Magnet into a position where the Potential for the Magnet to Fall can occur. This process can be very efficient!

The Reaction would be Loading a Coil and drawing a Current, this being the Magnetic Field Changing in Time!

The Counter-Reaction would be switching in our Copper Tube, e.g; another Coil and Drawing a Current, again this being the Magnetic Field Changing in Time!

As you can see, the Current in the System is not about us cranking a Handle! It is entirely dependant on the Magnetic Field Strength, the Rate at which they Change and the Natural dissipation of the System.

As was said by Mr T. H. Moray:

In an electrical circuit, the greater the inductance with resistance cut to a minimum, the greater the tendency of the electrical energy (current) to continue to flow once it is started.

Chris

• Liked by
onepower posted this 28 April 2018

The best resource I have found on the net for understanding electricity can be found here...http://amasci.com/miscon/voltage.html and http://amasci.com/miscon/whatis.html.

As Mr.Beaty points out most people not only use the wrong terms but also use the terms they know out of context. I cannot say enough good things about his common sense approach and more so explaining everything in simple terms everyone can understand.

Here is part of the lecture on supposedly "static" electricity...http://amasci.com/emotor/voltmeas.html

"Static electricity" is not electricity which is static and unmoving. Neither is it a form of energy. Actually, the thing we call Static electricity is an imbalance. It's an imbalance in the amounts of positive and negative charges found within the surface of an object. Only the imbalance between opposite charges is important, and their motion or "static-ness" is irrelevant. For example, the imbalance can flow along as an electric current, yet it loses none of its familiar "static electrical" properties. While the charge is flowing it still crackles, glows, and attracts dust and lint. But how can we have "static" electricity that flows along? "Motionless motion?!" The answer is simple. "Static electricity" is actually about the charge-imbalance, and it has nothing to do with charges at rest. "Static electricity" was misnamed.

OK, then what exactly is "static" electricity? Here's a big clue. There's always a strong e-field (electric field) surrounding these charges, and the field is there whether the charges are moving or still. This strong field is the main feature of so-called "static" electricity. But what's an e-field? One way to say it: an e-field is like a magnetic field, but it's electrical in nature. Another simple answer: an electric field is a voltage without a current. Whenever you have pure voltage, then you have a pure electric field with no magnetism involved: you have "electrostatics" without "magneto-statics."

Here's still another way to say it:

"Static Electricity" is not unmoving, it really means "High-voltage Electricity."

• Liked by
Chris posted this 28 April 2018

Hi Onepower - Thanks for the resources!

Perhaps we should dedicate a Thread for Electro / Magneto Statics?

I think this subject has a lot that needs to be covered! The Maxwell equations and why they all equate to Zero for example.

Chris

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 29 April 2018

As was said by Mr T. H. Moray:

In an electrical circuit, the greater the inductance with resistance cut to a minimum, the greater the tendency of the electrical energy (current) to continue to flow once it is started.

Chris

Hey Chris,

I can provide a practical example to help illustrate what Moray was speaking about for those here who don't understand what he's saying. I was quite surprised by what I found in the Moray writings and that quote I chose in one of my previous posts mentioned the oscillations induced by a capacitive-inductive discharge continuing until dissipated. Losing that kinetic energy is not a required thing. We could waste that energy and allow the oscillations or we can design a circuit so that the kinetic energy is put to use. Here we add two diodes and rather than the energy being reflected back it charges a destination capacitor. And it does so with such great efficiency that even a skeptic would have to take a moment to consider.

Here is my simulation: Capacitive-Inductive Inertia Recapture

Note: This simulation started in the browser, moved to the breadboard, and then the data from the actual results was used to enhance the accuracy of the simulation to make it spot-on. So this simulation reflects reality!

Here the first switch is a push button which is used to charge the 982nF capacitor to 140V. It just so happens that's how much I could charge my capacitor using my charging circuit. The third switch is closed allowing current to begin flowing. Watch the simulation and take note of what happens when the discharging capacitor has run out of energy... Its a beautiful thing to watch.

Data: The end result is approximately a 0.43V charge on a 2350uH capacitor from a 140V charge on a 982nF capacitor. If one is not impressed they should consider, the 982nF capacitor started with 137.5uC of charge and the charged capacitor ended up with 1011uC of charge. Further more, my test setup had one more diode than was optimal for this type of design (I had 3 like the simulation but only two are required). Although I could test for cap ESR and resistance on the inductor I couldn't directly calculate the resistance loss from the three diodes, but through trial and error I found that adding 165 ohms of resistance to the simulated circuit brought it in line with reality. My guess is that reducing one of the diodes would have improved results but I didn't confirm it.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 29 April 2018

Hey Zanzal,

That is completely awesome! Thanks for sharing!

I am going to have to study a little further, my Electronics skills are not as good as yours. Wish I knew more, not yet focused enough on the Electronics side enough. I only know enough to get by.

Awesome Simulation, thanks for sharing!

@Onepower, I have gone through and started an Electrostatics Thread. Hope you have a little time to correct me where I make mistakes!

Thanks Guys! This is really starting to get good now! The interesting bits are here!

We truly are Light Years ahead of all other Forums!

Chris

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 29 April 2018

You're welcome Chris, here is one you might like: Partnered Output Coil Version

Its not been modified to reflect reality (that is I didn't verify that one), but if you decide to perform the test and see how well reality matches the simulation. Just change the component values to reflect what you are actually using and if all goes well it may even work as simulated.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 30 April 2018

Hey Zanzal,

I have not been able to simulate, however, with the right application and the time, with the right params, I think it would be possible.

Chris

Chris posted this 30 April 2018

Today, we commonly see four Forces in the Fundamental Interactions.

• Strong Force
• Weak Force
• Electromagnetic Force
• Gravitational Force

Of course we are specifically focusing on the Electromagnetic Force. The only force we have at our disposal to interact with the Universe at a Subatomic level.

Partnered Output Coils use Magnetic Interactions, specifically, Magnetomotive Force, M.M.F, to Force Current, via the Lorentz Force, down an Insulated Copper Wire. This Current we would never see normally, it is Free Current. The best base Experiment to show this effect is The Mr Preva Experiment.

For this to occur a Voltage potential must first be produced. A basic analogy, 10 Volts applied across 10 Turns, would Induce 50 Volts across 50 Turns, an increase in Voltage Potential of: 5 times.

Note: It is the Magnetic Field Interactions that gives rise to an excess in Electrical Energy!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 30 April 2018

My Friends,

In reference to electrons, neutrons, protons, photons, and ions, etc., it is our theory in using these terms that they are the energy of the universe, which have become disassociated here and there, and these innumerable infinitesimal particles constitute (by forces they exert and the disturbances they originate) the substratum of what our senses terms as matter, and by nature splitting matter the energy of the universe is born and matter "reborn."

Matter is susceptible to motion. The media is susceptible to stress. All atoms appertain either to matter or energy, and continually pass from one to the other, thus introducing kinetic energy. There at its very foundation matter consists of electrical charges which govern the very motion of celestial bodies — including radioactive radiations of energy and matter. The evolution of matter and the evolution of energy.

T. H. Moray - the Sea of Energy in which the Earth Floats.

When you understand this quote, you will truly understand how Energy Machines work that produce much grater Output than Input!

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 30 April 2018

T. H. Moray also goes on to state:

There can be no "production" of current electricity, there will be no kinetic energy if there is no disturbance of equilibrium, that is to say change of potential of energy level.

Another quote to help understand exactly what is being said.

Its all there, its a case of connecting the dots, with real engineerable Science! Leaving the Oompa Loompa Science, that has crept into this field, behind would greatly benefit those that wish to move forward!

Chris

• Liked by
onepower posted this 30 April 2018

T. H. Moray - the Sea of Energy in which the Earth Floats.

In my opinion this is our guide to understanding the universe and is required reading. Tesla and many others were okay but men like T.H. Moray, Viktor Schauberger and Walter Russell laid the groundwork for a universal understanding.

It's all in the premise and connecting all the right dots... the concept. Our foundation is the fact that everything in the universe is in perpetual motion on every scale. There is no need to debate this fact and whenever anyone tells us something may be a perpetual motion machine we should ask them, can you give me even one example of something which is not in perpetual motion?.... they cannot. Perpetual motion, the kinetic, is the universal norm and not an exception to any rule.

In this respect it is not a simple matter of believing, it is a matter of understanding and knowing. When we look at something, anything, anywhere it is to be understood that every part of that thing present is in perpetual motion. In time it becomes normal to us and our perspective will change.

In time we may begin to see "The Paradox". We see 99% of people have literally no comprehension of what Energy is nor the fact everything including themselves are immersed in it... they are not our concern. We see those who so desperately want Energy but will not or cannot accept reality for what it is... it is kinetic in nature, it is perpetual and it is everywhere.

As Moray said--"Matter is susceptible to motion. The media is susceptible to stress. All atoms appertain either to matter or energy, and continually pass from one to the other, thus introducing kinetic energy. There at its very foundation matter consists of electrical charges which govern the very motion of celestial bodies".

As such the proper perspective is not to simply build another hopeless circuit or device but an energy receiver. The entire premise, the concept must revolve around disturbing the equilibrium or balance of the Electro-Magnetic system and then listening for a response. If the response is stronger we are moving in the right direction and if not we need to re-think what we are doing.

Marathonman posted this 30 April 2018

I wholeheartedly agree and very good post by the way onepower and Chris. it is quite possibly the entire reason trolls and shill disrupt threads is because of the lack of or misunderstanding that our ENTIRE UNIVERSE is a perpetual motion machine and thus living in the wheel work of said machine our perception of it's existence is quite distorted looking from inside out. it is the same as fish, they do not see water as water because they live in it. it is their normal life and breath looking from inside out.

Since the first day i was introduced to the Figuera device or plainly a set of bucking coils i knew i was on to something. using two bucking primers to increase the kinetic energies available to the secondaries with out loading the primers in the first place thus reducing the primers to just that of the IR2 losses.  there is no destruction of energies, just the movement from one form to another thus the universe recycles it's energies from one form to another in an never ending cycle, a constant cyclic motion from one dimension to another with the introduction of currant flow in the cyclic process.

we are literally living in the sea of energies just like the fish that do nothing but eat and breath not knowing the reality of things. those people that know not of it's existence will remain just that,  a fish, while others like ourselves will continue to evolve and grow and become the pioneers to construct the vessel to explore the vast Universe of energy.

The sea of energy in which our vessel does float.

Marathonman

• Liked by
Wistiti posted this 30 April 2018

Guys, you are really awesome!

Thank you!

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 30 April 2018

Hey Zanzal,

I have not been able to simulate, however, with the right application and the time, with the right params, I think it would be possible.

Chris

I understand the disconnect now. After running many simulations I realize I was looking at the problem from the wrong side of things. I made a better simulation to fully examine the problem from 3 different angles and that led me to understand my simulation was not overunity. This simulation better illustrates the idea: Step Down Problem

What I saw initially was that I performed a transformation that was 600% more efficient than a comparable passive solution. That observation is not incorrect, but rather it omits a material fact that my passive solution I was comparing it too was simply 1000% inefficient. Stepping down voltage and stepping up voltage both incur a cost. I can lower cost depending on how I approach the problem I can do things really poorly, or I can do it very efficiently. But no well known transformation strategy will result in a net gain from one voltage level to another. [I still believe the secret is out there, but its not found in the equation R^2 < 4L/C as far as I can determine.]

So anyway I've learned something incredible useful, just not something that any experienced person didn't already understand intuitively or otherwise. It certainly does raise some other questions like, would I even recognize overunity if I saw it?

Note: My percentages are all ballpark relative to the baseline comparison using a 12.8V battery.. Even than simulation is not 100% efficient and wastes about 40% of the power....Efficiency is not an absolute thing.. its very much relative.

• Liked by
Zanzal posted this 30 April 2018

In my opinion this is our guide to understanding the universe and is required reading. Tesla and many others were okay but men like T.H. Moray, Viktor Schauberger and Walter Russell laid the groundwork for a universal understanding.

I agree, the book does a great job of making the case of looking at energy as being something all around us to figure out new and more inventive ways of harnessing. Not that we shouldn't ask the question, can I make my battery power my load so efficiently that I don't even need the battery? That's my personal desire but its not the only discovery that one could make. Harnessing that 4-500000 coulombs of charge under my feet, capturing cosmic rays, rectifying heat into electricity. There are so many opportunities we can look for that we will only discover IF we look.

• Liked by
onepower posted this 30 April 2018

Zanzal

What is a battery but another form of electron pump?. They tell me a battery works because of "chemistry" which is another word for alchemy but I see neither in it. I see molecules having a specific geometry which give and receive particle/fields between themselves which creates a charge/field imbalance  ... I see no chemistry. To make progress one must cast off all superficial contrivance and see things for what they truly are not what others tell us we are supposed to see... we can see for ourselves.

In truth your battery simply creates a field bias compelling free electrons to move towards the negative pole. Likewise if we have moved electrons towards the negative pole there must be a deficit of electrons at the positive pole which defines it as such. As we can see we have altered the internal geometry of matter which they call chemistry creating by-products in the process and this is not the way my friends.

It begs the question... what is the way?, and I can point you in the right direction. Moray did not create by-products which in themselves would require an equivalent amount of energy to transform them back to their original state. Moray's battery was not a transformer of matter however it could create the field bias required to move electrons and this motion constituting our electron current.

If not why then how?, where is our impetus which could cause something to move, the kinetic?... our bias?. Moray's battery would use oxidized metal plates the oxide layer performing the same function as the band gap found in every solar cell. His series or substrate of oxidized metal plates followed the tribo-electric series. Do you see?, each layer creates an electric field bias or impetus in itself and the moment an electron moves within the gradient of force it finds itself within another. Layer upon layer, force upon force, field gradient upon field gradient and it is compelled to move at the slightest disturbance... the oscillation.

We could ask... what is it then?. Why it is nothing more than a permanent dielectric with a uni-direction predetermined periodic bias in one direction due to any form of oscillation. It is nothing more than a glorified check valve acting on the proper scale in which most never thought to question. Many called this artifact of cause and effect Maxwell's demon however I suspect it is no demon... quite the opposite.

You cannot judge a book by it's cover, that was never the intent of the authors nor the story we follow... it is much more than that.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 01 May 2018

My Friends,

Onepower is 100% correct!

The act of Pushing, or Pulling, a different angle, on doing the same thing, moving an object.

The goal is to build an Active Element, meaning turn your Coils into a Source, a supply of Current, don't Drive them!

Bring about the ability for the Coils to supply more and more Current! A Source, they are effectively your Battery! Or your Electrical 'Generator', in the true sense of the word.

In the electrostatics Thread we saw, rubbing a Glass Rod with Silk creates a net Negative Charge on the Glass, it Add's Electrons to the Glass, giving the Glass a greater Negative Charge than Positive, this is Charge Separation at the Base level.

This Rubbing, only creates a Potential and nothing more! It does not Create a Current, that's why its Static, the Charge can be stored, static.

Your Coils Require a Charge Separation, a Potential Difference on the terminals, before any Current can Flow. This is the exact same thing as rubbing the Glass with silk, separate charge, now we have the Potential, for Current to flow, Electrons flying down the Wire! Electrons in Motion, Kinetic Energy!

Learn the Concepts before judging the outcome, as an Experiment has more to give other than just Numbers!

Chris

onepower posted this 01 May 2018

Now your starting to see the big picture.

It is important to understand there are not different kinds of electricity there is only one kind which relates to negative and positive charged particle/fields and charge imbalance. However the properties they exhibit change with the charge density or potential. The only difference between the effects seen from a AA battery and the effects seen from rubbing a glass rod with silk is the potential difference they can produce. We could say that with a change in charge density comes a change in properties and the effects they produce.

In fact I read one patent which claimed free energy where the inventor had lined the stator of his generator with rabbit fur. Now what do you suppose he was trying to accomplish rubbing rabbit fur across copper windings at high speed?... contact electrification I would think.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 01 May 2018

To Pump, is to create Stress, or Pressure:

An electrical generator is in the true sense not a generator. It creates nothing. Electricity is not made by the generator, it is merely captured or pumped.

T. H. Moray - The sea of Energy in which the Earth Floats

The Thread, Asymmetrical Regauging shows the importance of this Pump Action:

• The Potential ( Voltage ) is bought up.
• Work is done, dissipating the gained Potential. Kinetic Energy: Electrons moving, Current..
• The process if repeated.

This is Regauging, doing it Asymmetrically is important, this is the Rate at which Energy can be Gained!

The above Image is from: Here

The Ramp down is the Current Phase, work is being done here! This is a critical phase, but can only occur if there is a Potential for this Current to Flow, which must be created first! As stated above.

Exactly the same fundamental process as the Magnet Falling through the Copper Tube:

Graham Gunderson shows this process:

• Sharp, short Voltage Spike, is the Potential being bought up.
• The Triangle Wave, ramping down, this is the Magnetic Field,

The magnetic Field, or the Current, which is Equal and Opposite on each Coil, which is fundamentally, a Lenz's Law Effect, the Equal and Opposite Magnetomotive Forces creating a Stress, between the two Partnered Output Coils, this I have shown many many times now.

Please see the Concepts, not anything else, there is a very good reason I have done what I have done. This will become clear later on.

Remember:

In a mechanical system, the greater the inertia the greater the tendency of the body to keep in motion once it is set in motion. In an electrical circuit, the greater the inductance with resistance cut to a minimum, the greater the tendency of the electrical energy (current) to continue to flow once it is started.

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 04 May 2018

My Friends,

Changing Magnetic Fields Act on Charged Particles. The very basis on much of our Science today!

In my Thread: Reduced Impedance Effect, I show how a Coil can dramatically change the Time ( t ), taken to charge to maximum Magnetic Field for the applied Voltage. Normally, where we would see a Charge and Discharge Current like so:

##### Discharge Equations:

We go from normal Charge Current:

to a dramatically faster Charge Current:

When the Magnetic Field of each coil opposes each other, there is a Reduced Impedance Effect. This is entirely dependant on the Magnetic Field Strength. As a Transformer can burn out is the Transformer is pushed into Saturation, the Coils loosing all their Self-Inductance, allowing huge Currents to flow Unimpeded, Partnered Output Coils also exhibit the same characteristic.

If Free Electrons are Accelerated and more Electrons Liberated from the Binding Forces in the Atom, then they can Increase the Rate of Kinetic Energy. We see an Increase, or an Amplification in Electrical Current! The Mr Preva Experiment and also my Thread: Some Coils Buck and some Coils DONT, show this effect.

We have seen before, this very fast swing, exactly as I have shown:

The Green Waveform, the very fast transition from Positive to Negative, Shown here again, in solid Blue, but a little easier to see the very fast change:

At this point, marked, the Coil completely flips polarity. Also, important to note, the Amplitude is very much greater on the Negative half of the cycle. By approximately twice.So, How would one achieve twice the amplitude?

Chris

• Liked by
Chris posted this 07 May 2018

My Friends,

I want to share a post that caught my eye else where:

#### How does an INDUCTOR work? Why is its behavior so counter-intuitive? Compared to CAPACITORs?

Although CAPACITORs are very intuitive to understand ( I = CdV/dT ), inductors are almost never even taught in circuits classes, although, they are equally useful and irreplaceable circuit elements (if not MORE). The fundamentals are almost identical. Whatever you are thinking about VOLTAGE in C , think the same actions in CURRENT in L ( I=LdI/dt ). As far as energy storage, same thing : 1/2 CV2 vs. 1/2 LI2. Can't be more similar.

But yet, in circuits education, inductors are treated as the bad kid that nobody likes, nobody cares about, and nobody understands. Can the reason be that,

a) it is very easy for humans to conceptualize ELECTRONS ACCUMULATING to store energy, rather than, ELECTRONS TURNING INTO MAGNETIC ENERGY TO STORE ENERGY ? ... or ,

b) the fact that, when you store electrons in a capacitor, ignoring leakage, they will stay there FOREVER, whereas, the INDUCTOR cannot stop the current flow, so, the magnetic energy will have to be immediately dissipated, otherwise, the voltage will reach a million volts until something pops on the circuit board. Is it possible that, this "unstoppable continuity" making the inductor difficult to conceptualize ? ... or ,

c) the inductor is bulky, and difficult to make ? This is why the circuits education went the least resistance path of teaching (no pun intended) and chose the capacitors ?

Research Gate

it really isn't that difficult if you can comprehend what a MAGNETIC FIELD is ...

I think, our education system ignores the importance of MAGNETIC FIELDs early on in high school, which makes it difficult to comprehend the inductor later at undergrad ...

If you think of it like a capacitor, where energy is STORED, you won't be able to explain it. When you change the DeltaI in an inductor, the magnetic field is created which is the TENDENCY TO KEEP THAT CURRENT FLOWING. When you stop pumping current into the inductor, it wants to keep that current going. This is how you STORE energy in an inductor.

Since the energy is stored in a capacitor using an ELECTRON, it is natural human tendency to think, energy is stored an an inductor via a different particle like MAGNETRON , but, it is really the same electron storing the energy, this time in a different mode of operation.

To summarize, if you apply an electric field on an electron, you elevate it to a different POTENTIAL (i.e., Voltage), thereby STORING ENERGY. .

if you create a magnetic field with an electron by changing its flow rate (i.e., current), they have the tendency to stay flowing in the same NEW RATE, thereby STORING energy.

Tolga Soyata - University at Albany, The State University of New York

NOTE: A detailed study of why Inductors have a "TENDENCY TO KEEP THAT CURRENT FLOWING" gives rise to a new and fantastic possibilities!

First we see a Charge Time:

The Voltage is applied across the Coil, the Current ramps up as shown previously:

The Voltage is switched off and we see the Decay Phase, this is where we see the Inductor: has a "TENDENCY TO KEEP THAT CURRENT FLOWING", the equation is: I=LdI/dt

So, the Electrons in the Wire want to keep moving at off time, but we are not supplying any Electrons into the Circuit!

Like the Magnet in the Copper Tube experiment, we see the Change of Magnetic Field falling down the Pipe, creates a Voltage and the Current can then flow, but the Voltage is very small and the Current very High, this is because the Impedance is very low, for maximum Current Flow.

The same is true of the Decay Phase, we see the Magnetic Field Collapsing:

The magnetic Field decaying in Time is keeping the Voltage, or the E.M.F, or the Potential High. We see the same in the Mr Preva experiment but because we have a lot more Stress, more Current can Flow, we are Accelerating and also Liberating Electrons from the orbitals.

Opposing Magnetic Fields "Generate" Electrical Energy just like the Amber Rod has Electrons removed, becoming positively Charged, by rubbing Cat Fur on the Amber Rod, we are displacing Electrons, Current can then Flow to balance the Charge Difference,

Today, we know how to Amplify Current, the goal is to Amplify it further! I = V / R is how this is done!

Chris

• Liked by
Jagau posted this 08 May 2018

Excellent Chris, very good video to understand.

I like the 2 videos of youtube on time and off time, wonderful image that also confirms that the maximum of energy as much as off time is maximun at the center of the coil.

quote:

If Free Electrons are Accelerated and more Electrons Liberated from the Binding Forces in the Atom, then they can Increase the Rate of Kinetic Energy.

What do you think of Don Smith's expression that tells us that electrons exist in the form of a doublet?
Does it sound like what Paul Dirac said in the 1933s that the electron has a positron that he called antimatter reverse-polarity electrons?

Jack

• Liked by
Chris posted this 08 May 2018

Hey Jack,

I also find the graphical representation helpful, they are good videos.

I am not sure on the Electron, I have a few ideas but I just do not know enough to say for sure.

In saying this, covered in part above, what we measure as a Waveform has more than one part. There is always two sides: Light/Dark, Matter/Antimatter, Push/Pull...

We see an effect in the Coil that must be seen from two angles:

We count everything below the Green Waveform as Current in this case. From Zero ( 0 ) to the peak Amplitude at time ( t ).

We completely ignore whats above the Green Waveform. What is above the Green Waveform?

The answer is the Magnetic Field, this is what the Current Creates, a Transformation, a storage phase, a Flow of Electrons, Transforms into a Magnetic Field.

At the completion of the storage phase, turn off, the Magnetic Energy is released and the Coil is expose to Electromagnetic Induction and as a result produces an E.M.F, this, if a Load is connected, a Current Could Flow, which is the Decay Phase we see, the ramping Down.

NOTE: The Decay Phase is identical, but in reverse to the storage phase, if the decay phase were to be flipped vertically, the storage and decay phases would be identical.

NOTE: A DC to DC Converter uses this exact concept and good Converters are around 98% efficient.

I think it is important we think of Dualities where everything we do, has an equal and opposite pair, as pointed out above, Light/Dark, Good/Bad, Up/Down...

Chris

p75213 posted this 03 September 2018

Today, we commonly see four Forces in the Fundamental Interactions.

• Strong Force
• Weak Force
• Electromagnetic Force
• Gravitational Force

Of course we are specifically focusing on the Electromagnetic Force. The only force we have at our disposal to interact with the Universe at a Subatomic level.

Partnered Output Coils use Magnetic Interactions, specifically, Magnetomotive Force, M.M.F, to Force Current, via the Lorentz Force, down an Insulated Copper Wire. This Current we would never see normally, it is Free Current. The best base Experiment to show this effect is The Mr Preva Experiment.

For this to occur a Voltage potential must first be produced. A basic analogy, 10 Volts applied across 10 Turns, would Induce 50 Volts across 50 Turns, an increase in Voltage Potential of: 5 times.

Note: It is the Magnetic Field Interactions that gives rise to an excess in Electrical Energy!

Chris

Hi Chris,

I am confused about the following statement "Partnered Output Coils use Magnetic Interactions, specifically, Magnetomotive Force, M.M.F, to Force Current, via the Lorentz Force, down an Insulated Copper Wire."

I am wondering how the lorentz force could force current down a wire as it acts at 90 degrees to the current.

• Liked by
Chris posted this 03 September 2018

Hi P,

Any and all Charged Particles, that are free to move, in the presence of Electromagnetic Fields, are subject to a Force, the Lorentz Force. Of course a "motion" is required to start this process away, but once started, this effect can be seen on the bench!

CRT's use this effect, Magnetron's Particle Accelerators, Science is pretty up to date on these simple techniques.

Ref: https://www.coursera.org/lecture/particle-physics/3-1-principles-of-particle-acceleration-srCR7

I hope this helps some!

Chris

• Liked by
Marathonman posted this 03 September 2018

Actually Maxwell had that equation when Lorentz was 8 years old and i have wondered why Lorentz got the credit for it.

YES, the Maxwell/Lorentz force hard at work.

Very good post Chris.

Regards,

Marathonman

• Liked by
Chris posted this 03 September 2018

@All following,

I perhaps need to clarify a few things:

We know an Electric Current is defined as 6.24 x 1024 Electrons per second, moving past Pt0. This quantity is One Coulomb of Charge. We know that an Electron is a Negatively Charged Particle,  each Electron having 1.602 x 10-19 Coulombs of Charge. The symbol for the Coulomb is: ( C )

At this stage we have satisfied two fundamental requirements for Particle Acceleration, we have:

1. Charged Particles.
2. The Charged Particles have Velocity, of: 6.24 x 1024 Electrons per second, moving past point Pt0.

Charged Particles in motion constitute a Magnetic Field, B which is Orthogonal to E, the Electric Field. They are the same things viewed from a different observational perspective! We must not forget, we have this entire situation twice, 2x fold which is Partnered Output Coils!

1. Coil one has Current moving to the left, Coil two has Current moving to the right...
2. Coil one has a Magnetic Field Vector Inwards, Coil two has a Magnetic Field Vector inwards...

Thus, the very definition of a Particle Accelerator has been for-filled and on the bench we now have the most simple form of a Particle Accelerator that I know of. Its been around for more than 100 years and very few people have ever picked up this basic fact!

I urge all following, do your own research, cross reference what I have told you, study and learn for your selves, find the truth for your self, learn from the experts:

I ask you, don't to take my word for it, I would prefer you come to your own conclusions! Learning the truth has never been so satisfying! Not a single view on the video since I posted it.

Chris

p75213 posted this 04 September 2018

From the video Principles of Particle Acceleration "Electric fields are used to accelerate particles by increasing their momentum. Magnetic fields deflect them from their original direction"

motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field

"So, does the magnetic force cause circular motion? Magnetic force is always perpendicular to velocity, so that it does no work on the charged particle. The particle’s kinetic energy and speed thus remain constant. The direction of motion is affected, but not the speed. This is typical of uniform circular motion. The simplest case occurs when a charged particle moves perpendicular to a uniform B-field, such as shown in. (If this takes place in a vacuum, the magnetic field is the dominant factor determining the motion. ) Here, the magnetic force (Lorentz force) supplies the centripetal force"

Cyclotron

A cyclotron accelerates charged particles outwards from the center along a spiral path. The particles are held to a spiral trajectory by a static magnetic field and accelerated by a rapidly varying (radio frequency) electric field.

I'm not trying to be a smartarse here, but everything I have read and watched leads me to believe that particle acceleration is via the electric field. This doesn't take away from the fact that particle acceleration is taking place.

Chris posted this 04 September 2018

Hi P,

I think you missed the fact that a changing Magnetic Field IS an Electric Field?

From Sir Richard Feynman, the worlds greatest Physicist:

P, I have to ask, have you used another name, specifically: Milehigh?

Chris

Marathonman posted this 04 September 2018

I hate to be a party pooper but that is exactly how a Cyclotron works,

##### have you increased your Kinetic energy today.

regards,

Marathonman

• Liked by
Chris posted this 04 September 2018

Marathonman is correct!

I quote:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to .E

I have also shown, exactly how this works:

You can see, technically, the Magnetic Field ( B ), shown in Red cancels out and would be seen as a flat line with no Amplitude, however I have shown the Magnetic Field with Amplitude so one can see the Magnetic Wave forms are equal and opposite, only one difference is that they travel in opposite Directions.

This is compared to the standard wave:

The Electric Field ( E ) doubles as a result of the two waves, equal in Amplitude, and travelling in opposite directions, and some math says its more than double, that it is actually the Square of the Magnetic Field strength.

We also see more proof of this in our replications of: The Mr Preva Experiment, showing the Electric Field doubles, or the Current doubles.

Chris

p75213 posted this 04 September 2018

Hi P,

I think you missed the fact that a changing Magnetic Field IS an Electric Field?

From Sir Richard Feynman, the worlds greatest Physicist:

P, I have to ask, have you used another name, specifically: Milehigh?

Chris

I realize that a changing magnetic field is an electric field . That's how induction works.

I have used another name but it's not Milehigh and not on this forum.

Chris posted this 04 September 2018

Hi P,

All are welcome, but we have a very tough Troll policy! Big Red Button sort of thing. Most all of us are sick and tired of Trolls and we will not tolerate them any more!

I do believe we have largely changed the Trolling BS for the better! People are safe here! After all, how does a Troll Troll a Troll? Only on the other forums!

Chris

Marathonman posted this 04 September 2018

The most important overlooked aspect is the pressure between the two fields. if you double the pressure between them you increase the output 4 times as it is the square of the two intensities. this specific is being overlooked in the Figuera device also with many replicators failing to get an output.

increase the pressure, increase the Electric field, increase the output.

Did you hear what i just said, "PRESSURE" all electrical systems are pressure related. draw current from a generator causes the regulator to send more pressure to the excitors to increase the pressure in the output and the load.

From Sir Richard Feynman, the worlds greatest Physicist:

this is a matter of opinion as i prefer D B Larsen hands down all day long. the silent unsung hero type that got passed up for smoke and mirror type.

Regards,

Marathonman

• Liked by
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Our Above Unity Machines:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Start Here:
Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).