The Field Structure of Nature

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 882 Views
  • Last Post 01 August 2019
Chris posted this 13 May 2018

For sometime now I have touched on what I think the Structure of the Magnetic Field is.

This idea comes from many years of research and experiments.

 

 

Structure of the Atom - by Giesbert Nijhuis:

 

The amazing Water Dual Vortex Phenomena:

 

We see this in the Tornado Dual Vortex

:

 

There is a lot of evidence to show that Magnetic Fields hold similar characteristics in their Field Structures.

Now, in the above image of the Coriolis Effect, you know why all hurricanes ever recorded:

  1. Never cross the Equator!
  2. Have a Spin Direction which is directly linked to the Coriolis Effect and the same phenomena shown above with the Dual Vortex effect.
  3. Has intensity linked to Magnetic Field strength!

 

Some argue that there is no Equator seen in the Magnetic Field, I say there is good evidence and has been through out history! At the end of the day, we all have our beliefs, some are based on evidence and some are not.

Science is starting to see an equatorial in the magnetic Field. The Solar System also exhibits a similar thing:

 

Vortex Rings are a natural phenomena, they are everywhere: One of my favourites:

 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
onepower posted this 16 May 2018

Great posts, I like the north/south hemisphere video.

It would seem there are many people who can believe some things with no tangible proof yet cannot believe in other things with an abundance of proof. One oddity I had serious reservations about initially was "Dowsing" and I had to prove the matter for myself. I use two bent coat hanger wires and to this day I still have issues believing despite the fact I have found it to be 100% accurate in my case.

When talking with family and friends they say they cannot believe so I bend some wires and ask them to let me locate a pipe or line underground that I have no prior knowledge of. I locate it within inches and then they say it must be a trick of some kind. A trick?, how exactly can it be a trick if I have no prior knowledge of the thing I just located four feet underground?... that is some trick.

Statistically the probability of locating a pipe or line in a large field tends toward zero and yet for some reason it works. Here we can reasonably determine a few things... It does not work for everyone however we as individuals are obviously not "everyone" and there seem to be forces at play we have yet to understand.

Not a big deal, there are most likely billions of things we have yet to understand however one thing we can say for certain is that denial is not proof of anything other than denial.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 17 May 2018

@Onepower,

I remember the use of 'Dowsing' when I was a kid. Not heard of this for a long time!

Things of old appear to be topics today we forget. I am glad to see these returning! Important things!

Re the Water Video, I wanted to understand this further, it was a fantastic phenomena.

Talking about proof, I saw a video, they claimed it is an answer to the Coriolis Effect: (They are confusing Centrifugal Force and the Coriolis Effect)

 

I say, they have a lot to learn and a lot to apologise for! I cant believe an organisation like this would make such an effort to Scientifically explain something that is clearly not the way it works! After all, how do Hurricanes or Cyclones form: 'warm, moist air over the ocean rises upward'.

As our Earth spins, so does our Atmosphere and thus there is no difference in velocity of the Earth to the Atmosphere, the theories are wrong, and the Coriolis Effect for most remains largely unexplained, or does it?

 

Experiment:

I replicated the video, using only the South Hemisphere as a baseline.

I took one of my large Magnets and placed it under the bowl, filled with water and what did I see? Yes, the Water swirled in the opposite direction! Flip the Magnet and the Water swirls in the opposite direction!

The Magnetic Field Polarity was key to the direction of the Vortex motion and I could change the Direction with Magnetic Field Polarity.

 

Science is awesome, understanding simple things that are not taught in school makes life very much more interesting!

   Chris

onepower posted this 17 May 2018

There is much to learn Chris and my experience led to many other experiments. Dowsing is not what most people think and it is known in the art that our mind rejects 99% of our sensory input. It does this to avoid an information overload however that is not to say we cannot retrain or open our mind to new things.

As such I have come to believe the dowsing wires or rods do not actually detect anything... how could they?, why should they move?. A much more likely explanation which I have proven in many respects is that our body detects the anomaly and our mind involuntarily causes us to move the rods in the right direction... an intuition detector of sorts. That is, we may be able to sense an extraordinary number of things around us intuitively if only we could train our mind not to reject 99% of the information it actually detects.

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 17 May 2018

I agree Onepower!

Our Mind, one of the three things given, yet we use so little of it! ( Lucy )

'Dowsing' and other phenomena like it absolutely amaze me, its the missing part of Humanity! I believe with time this will come, Humans will begin to be spiritual again, the ways of the ancients will return. They must, for the Golden Age!

The "Hall of Records" is not a Geographic Location on Earth, its a Intellectual Region that can be reached individually.

   Chris

Chris posted this 18 May 2018

Some discussion on the Thread: Bloch Wall Clarification

I want to carry on here, as this thread is where this started. We discussed the Bloch Wall and what it actually is. Please read if you wish to understand this continuation.

We saw, there is a definite Doughnut, or Toroidal collection of Ferro-Fluid on the End of the Magnet: 

 

 

Ponder this: Why do we detect no Magnetic Field at the Center of the Magnet at the Bloch Wall like we do at the Poles of the Magnet?

Consider a single Flux line, forgive my crude graphic:

 

This is using Howard Johnson's observations as the Bloch Wall in the Centre of the Magnet:

 

You can see, The Curl of the Magnetic A Vector Potential, as it follows the Flux Line, cancels at the Centre of the magnet, the observed High Stress area where my magnetic Probe did not want to traverse. This is a High Stress area, Magnetic Flux is opposing, and thus the total net Vectors are cancelling. We detect no Magnetic Field.

 

We see a Magnetic Calm in the middle of the magnet, effectively, the Magnetic Field is Cancelled. This is Nature showing us something very important. Problem is we have not been smart enough to understand.

The reason we see the Spikes, well it is very simple, these spikes are the Inverse Square Law in action, as we saw the Tornado above, there is a Dual Vortex occurring, the Cancellation of Flux creates a counter to the strength of the Flux and because of this Cancellation, we see it decrease in Flux Strength as a function of the distance. 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
Chris posted this 18 May 2018

If you ever wanted to know why the Van Allen Belts are protecting the Earth:

The Electric Field is the result of the Magnetic cancelling...

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
onepower posted this 18 May 2018

Many of the greatest minds in the past implied we must learn to see beyond the illusions nature has created in our mind. That is, to understand the difference between what we think we are seeing and the primary cause of what is actually happening in reality.

For example, consider the pattern of iron filings around a magnet. They say this shows the pattern of the magnetic field and lines of force however to me it shows a failure of logic and reason. The pattern is an illusion based on the phenomena of "magnetic induction" whereby a magnetic field will induce an opposite polarity magnetic field in any magnetic material such as iron. Thus we see that any iron will be polarized in such a way that the induced field is always attracted to the field which induced it.

Now concerning the iron filings, pieces of iron wire or cores in proximity to a magnet. When the pieces of iron material are magnetized or polarized they follow a simple set of rules. Parallel filings repel each other because the induced poles on each end of the filing are like poles thus they must repel. Iron filings not parallel but in series attract each other because the induced poles on each end are unlike poles thus they must attract.

At which point we can begin to see that because parallel filings repel and series filings attract the induced forces present would naturally cause lines of filings to form which converge at the source poles. The primary cause of said lines is not due to the source magnetic field but the individual fields induced in each iron filing acting on each other.

 

We must always keep the primary cause of things in mind and look past the superficial nature of what we think we are seeing in order to make progress.  

 

  • Liked by
  • Chris
dummyload posted this 18 May 2018

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Chris posted this 18 May 2018

Hey Bob,

Sorry if I miss understood your question.

I agree, a Magnet is made up from lots of smaller Magnets. Why is a Neodymium Magnet so much better that Cobolt?

 

You can see, the number of Electrons/Protons are very much greater in a Neodymium Magnet compared to a Cobolt Magnet. The Electrons are what give rise to the Magnetic Field.

The Magnetic Field is created by the Net Electron Spin. An external Magnetic Field Aligning The Electrons:

 

Question:

What force attracts or repels the Magnets?

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
Chris posted this 18 May 2018

@Onepower - Completely agree! For those reading this was bought up: here

@Dummyload - Awesome find! Thanks for sharing! Multi Pole Magnets have been around for some time, but this pre dates every thing I have read! Thanks for sharing!

 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
Chris posted this 18 May 2018

In a single Current loop we see something we have seen else where:

 

Magnetic Flux will always take the shortest path! In Air, in Iron, in any material that Magnetic Flux ( Φ ) traverses, it will always take the shortest possible path.

So where have we see this structure before? Its everywhere:

 

Atomic Detonations:

 

We see excellent evidence in the Ferro-Fluid of this on the end of the Magnet:

 

Ref: youtube.com watch?v=3PpKKDw_lIk

The conventional view of the Magnetic Field, we should see the Ferro-Fluid collect at the Centre of the Magnet, joining from one pole to the other, magnetic attraction, but we don't see this. In point of fact, the Ferro-Fluid does not want to move toward the Centre of the Magnet at all. 

Amazingly, Jellyfish have a similar shape:

Remember the shortest Path, this is what it looks like:

 

That's just the coolest thing, one of the most efficient structures in Nature!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
onepower posted this 18 May 2018

Many years ago I built a hall effect magnetometer array to plot magnetic field strength and came to similar conclusions as that of Howard Johnson. The greatest field strength is not at the center of the pole face but near the edge of the face where it curls back on itself. Thus most all depictions you see in the textbooks are incorrect.

However it begs the question... why at the edge of the pole face?. Reason suggests each layer of the domains should be treated as a layer and each layer is additive. There is no "whole" magnet as the whole is always composed of many parts and should be seen as such. Thus each layer of magnetic material stacked on the other grows in strength which must always reinforce a curl back on itself. More layers of material produces more force pushing forward and more force curling back on itself... the greatest curl where there is the greatest cumulative strength at the face edge.

It all makes more sense when seen from the proper perspective and explains why the greatest strength at the pole face edge should curl back to the center of the magnet. That is the nearest point of the lowest potential at the zero plane dividing the N-S condition. The next lowest potential condition is the opposite pole however we should remember it is twice the distance away.

Chris posted this 19 May 2018

Isnt it amazing how this simple thread dispells the long standing myth of the Magnetic Field.

 

This is amazing also: Fundamental Building Blocks or Nature

 

The fundamental building blocks of nature are fluid-like substances which are spread throughout the entire universe and ripple in strange and interesting ways.

 

Sounds like the Aristotle's Quintessence! Dis-proven by the Michelson-Morley Experiment. 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
Chris posted this 19 May 2018

Also anther very good video:

 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
onepower posted this 19 May 2018

In the big picture we should strive to experiment and perform experiments for ourselves to prove matters for ourselves... anything less just seems like speculation.

Here is another experiment I performed in the past which may interest some here. I was preoccupied with Faraday's Homopolar motor/generator and I could not understand how something which appears to simple could be so complicated. Why the conjecture?, why a supposed paradox?. So I went through the literature and as most have found the standard explanations seem absurd at best.

So as we start removing all that is known and start concentrating on a primary cause we are left with the notion that something is happening in the copper disk with respect to a supposedly static magnetic field. Here we have two options... a current across a disk and a magnetic field so we can discard the magnetic field as it reasonably know so far as know can be.

The copper disk... I used an 120v AC dissectible transformer secondary as a primary and a 3 turn coil as a secondary which was rectified to produce a DC current around 200 amperes. This was connected across the length of a thick aluminum plate with no external magnetic field disk attached. I used my hall effect magnetometer array to track and plot the magnetic field strength in the plate thus the actual path of the current through the plate. It was found that the current path specifically being a free path cannot follow the path of least resistance. Why?, because the curl of the magnetic field bound to a free current path induces a secondary field in the plate which acts in such a direction that the free current path always forms an arc and not a straight line as supposed.

Now if we have an electric current which has a free path not constrained like a wire conductor and the currents magnetic field is bound to said current which must self-induce itself within the conductor forming an arc. Then the perpendicular supposedly static permanent magnetic field disk attached to the copper disk in a homoplar motor/generator must recognize the secondary induced field forming an arc as a motional conductor due to the arc of the free current path.

The confusion would seem to be due to the fact that perceptually our mind has serious reservations concerning a motional force acting on another motional force with few or no constraints as the zero plane which dictates the fulcrum from which the the forces are born becomes motional or elastic in itself. It would seem to confound our mind to no end that nature is dynamic always acting within three dimensions on multiple scales.

Personally I find it interesting because there is always something new to learn from even the most basic experiments. A mind at rest remains at rest, a mind in motion... that's another story.

If there is a lesson to be learned it is simple... check your premise, experiment.

 

Marathonman posted this 19 May 2018

Very wise statement Onepower,  Gravity has a three dimensional plain of existence and when exposed to a two dimensional magnetic field it cancels out two of the Gravitational dimensions leaving one Gravitational dimension which causes currant to flow from the Aether (counter space) into the primer system.(space) the whole electron knocking loose loose thing makes me chuckle as that would make copper not copper. i am a firm believer of electricity traveling on the outside of the wire not through it but hey, that is not everyone's game of dielectric reflector theory. as for the the currant path and curl i very much agree currant is guided in an arch trajectory to the outer rim being guided by spiraling fields and counter fields.

 

Marathonman

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • glennmr2018
onepower posted this 19 May 2018

Idea1man

Quote: "Now that we have gotten down to the original basics of the structure of a magnetic field, I can see what the lines of force are. They are like the meteorologist's isobar lines, which don't exist. They only mark pressure measurements."

Exactly, the standard is that if possible you never use a measuring device which is directly influenced by the thing to be measured or the measure is corrupt. However this is exactly what they did when they used ferromagnetic material in the iron filings experiment. As such they were not measuring the source field structure they were measuring the effects of magnetic induction on iron filings.

To make matters worse they then conceived imaginary lines of force based on their flawed perspective due to the corrupt measurement. Then they proceeded to apply this flawed model to everything in science in effect corrupting the science.

This is a perfect example of what happens when we layer one false belief on another built on a foundation of quicksand.

 

Chris posted this 20 May 2018

My Friends,

I agree completely with you all.

However, there is a useful construct to the Magnetic Field, it must be recognised that Science has the Magnetic Field wrong, once properly conceptualised, it still does provide a useful means of description.

A long time ago I pointed out the use and method of the Turbo, how a pressure is a tool of Humanity.

Pressure or Stress, the same thing.

Stress is the Invokes Induction as pointed out by Onepower, Induction is the Measure of what we call Voltage and Current - The Absolute Goal.

In my work, presenting Bucking Coils, and the Stress they create, we have now come full circle:

 

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • glennmr2018
Vidura posted this 28 May 2018

Hi team

here as a really  interesting explication from mr.Tewari Paramahamsa about the structure of atoms, followed by a testing of his reduced reaction generator. some parts of the video are with problems of soundtrack ,but it's worth waching.

Vidura posted this 28 May 2018

Hi Idea1men, Unfortunately the soundtrack is really difficult to understand, I used headphones and reviewed several times. The Space generator is not unipolar, it is a dynamo machine with a special shape of rotor and stator cores, so he creates a parallel flux path to bypass partially the counterEMF. He states to have a COP of 3-4 with this machine and have a readily developed prototype and is looking for investment to begin series production. Regarding the atom he describes as hollow but finally not empty, it contains space or aether, with a imensly high flux density in the centre,which is consistent with some other scientists.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
Vidura posted this 29 May 2018

when i  reveving this threat a statement about magnetic lines of force called my attention.the magnetic lines where compared to the isobaric lines from meteorology and show only diferent densities of flux.

i think that this comparision is not at all correct, the lines (existing or not) should be understand better like waves in the aether, a pattern, like if a stone is thrown into the water, setting up a wave pattern. for sure we can question if this waves have a proper  existence or if it's only water at all(or aether), but the effects are touchable or measureable.

There is an experiment described in an old peace of literature about magnets, i can't remember well in which book.

it consists in a sensible audioamplifier which has a single thin wire connected, then a magnet is moved forward and back very close to this wire.the noise produced is like a rippling, with a frequency proportional to the velocity of the movement.

The pattern of magnetic lines should be better interpreted like nodes in a standing wave, each one marking a maximum and a minimum, and yes they are gradually becoming weaker as the distance  increases. this aspect is similar to the isobaric lines.

  • Liked by
  • Zanzal
Vidura posted this 14 June 2018

Idea1man, i have downloaded from Tewari.org page. Strange, i have also McAffee on my notebook running and did not detect anything, I will scan the file again and replace.This is a new publication released march 2018

Attached Files

Vince posted this 03 July 2018

Some years ago I was managing a project at QUT in Brisbane.  The academic supervisor of the project was a Dr David Nuske.  He had a doctorate in physical dynamics.  

Gyroscopes undergoing precession were something I wanted a better understanding of and I asked him to help me in gaining that understanding one day. The sum of angular forces at work within a gyroscope undergoing forced precession are considered completely non intuitive, and I was somewhat relieved when he told me that.  Of course it is possible that he was just being kind too.

 He suggested that I plot the course of a location represented by a single dot on the outer surface of a gyroscope whilst it was undergoing forced (torque induced) precession.

By breaking up the path of the dot through it's three dimensional journey into discreet points along that path I could actually visualize it's course through one full cycle.  He then suggested I add three vectors to the dot at each location that represented the direction and magnitude of the angular forces acting upon that dot at every moment/location along it's path.  I was to then integrate those three into a single vector which would represent the Coriolis force at each point on my dot's journey. 

Coriolis is not actually a force in and of itself but is the sum of other angular forces.  It is a pseudo force, or sometimes described as an effect.  It is the sum of other angular forces acting on a body, or dot.  My dot had to have some arbitrary mass (I'm sure you got that bit already)

It is certainly a real effect in that it is able to be calculated accurately in both direction and magnitude.  Artillery officers are required to not only be familiar with it, but to be able to calculate exactly how it will affect the path of a projectile being fired in a north or south direction.  Actually any direction that has any substantial north or south directional component.

I decided to do as he suggested and at the end of the exercise I finally understood what Coriolis is.  However, it was not the only thing I learned from doing that exercise.  Prior to that I did not know that asprin is required to fuel a pen during such undertakings.

 

 

  • Liked by
  • Marathonman
Chris posted this 03 July 2018

@Vince,

Thanks for sharing, this is an interesting exercise!

What is the fundamental force that enables Precession? Is Precession a Cause or an Effect?

 

 

the slow movement of the axis of a spinning body around another axis due to a torque (such as gravitational influence) acting to change the direction of the first axis. It is seen in the circle slowly traced out by the pole of a spinning gyroscope.

 

The spin of a charged particle is associated with a magnetic dipole moment with a g-factor differing from 1.

 

The surface of the Earth has a negative charge of 300,000 volts relative to the positively charged ionosphere.

 

If the Earth had no Magnetic Field would it Precess?

 

Precession is experienced by all particles with non-zero spin when placed in a static external magnetic field. As the earth's magnetic field is "always on", nearly every magnetically receptive nucleus on earth, including hydrogen in every drop of water in the ocean, is at this moment quietly precessing away! I personally find this concept mind-boggling.

The earth's magnetic field is very small (~50 μT) and so the resonance frequencies are likewise very low (just a little over 2000 Hz for hydrogen). MRI and MRS have both been performed using only the earth's magnetic field.

Ref: http://mriquestions.com/does-precession--nmr.html

 

As you say, there is a Cause and Effect, depending on the determined Cause, you can see the Effect, but if the Effect can be modified by the fundamental, in experimental processes, then the cause must be reexamined. 

If Precession is caused by the Magnetic Field, then the Coriolis Effect must also be caused by the Magnetic Field, Precession, an Effect, and the Coriolis Effect, also an effect both effects seen after the fundamental. 

I believe the experiment I have shared would be valuable to all that replicate it!

   Chris

Vince posted this 04 July 2018

If Precession is caused by the Magnetic Field, then the Coriolis Effect must also be caused by the Magnetic Field, Precession, an Effect, and the Coriolis Effect, also an effect both effects seen after the fundamental

The model I was considering at the time was a spinning gyroscope inclined at 90° to the earths surface with one end of it's axle supported by a post, and the other end not supported.  The gyroscope had not charge nor associated field/s.  I am aware that there is a mass field associated with spinning masses but that is way above my head, and have been assured that it is not of enough magnitude in my little gyroscope to bother with so I was more than happy to ignore it. The earths magnetic field is not of sufficient magnitude to have any appreciable affect on a little brass gyroscope. 

I initially wanted to understand the forces preventing the unsupported end of the axle from falling under the influence of gravity, and why the gyroscope would rotate around the post once the free end was allowed to fall, but in fact did not fall.  I had previously spent quite some time looking at this weirdness and wondering what was going on.  By modeling the gyroscope, which is in fact a simple flywheel, I was trying to reduce the problem as far as possible. 

It has occurred to me previously that there must be a force acting on the earth for it to undergo precession.  However, just when I thought I had a handle on it I learned that there are two types of precession.  Torque-induced and non torque-induced.  I've not spent the time to learn the dynamics of non torque-induced precession due to other interests etc. so I let the earth's precession slide on by for the time being.  Then I began reading this post and realized my asprin powered pen might have to come back out. 

Since I got CFS my job squeezes most of the juice out of my poor little brain cells and they are very reluctant to do anything further.  Trying to get them to tackle anything else is about as easy as pushing jelly up a pipe with a toothpick.

Once you introduce a magnetic field of sufficient magnitude to have appreciable affects things become even more complicated.  In the case of a metallic gyroscope with an imposed axial magnetic field Lorentz force must be considered.  And to make matters worse, that is also an angular force.  And then, to complicate it even further, you get another problem at no extra charge.  There will then be an angular motion of separated charges which will introduce more magnetic field interactions.

I did discuss the water in a basin problem with Nuske.  He believed, as I do these days, that the bowl is not of sufficient scale to be affected by the earths rotation and that bowl design and initial conditions play a larger role.  However I say this with great caution as I have not personally done any experiments of my own with this particular model. 

Nuske believed the release of the water into the bowel was going to affect the outcome to a large degree and would have to be arranged with great rigor, and the experiment repeated many times over with the same apparatus and initial conditions.  Nuske claimed at that time that he had himself done this experiment and that he observed indeterminate results as the water would just as often go either way.  I do know that this is done for tourists at some locations, but again, what are the initial conditions?  Is the water poured in 'exactly' perpendicular to the axis etc etc.. Has there been sufficient time to allow the water to completely settle such that there are no disturbances whatsoever?  I can't know the answer to these questions.

Now, your experiment introduces another consideration Chris.  If it is tap water there are ions in the water.  These ions will interact with the magnetic field via Lorentz force.  If one were to use pure water and the rotation still occurred it is even more complicated,  and certainly of interest to me.  What affect would the magnetic field have on a non conductive medium that is in perfect charge balance?  I am not aware of any forces that the magnetic field could impose on the water under such conditions.  However, if I were to list the number of things that I do not know there would not be enough paper, or bytes available to record it.  What is even worse is that not only is there virtually infinite stuff that I don't know, but I can't even know that I don't know it until I become aware if it in the first place!  Learning, for me, seems to have an inverse relationship to knowledge.

 

 

Chris posted this 04 July 2018

Hey Vince,

Well states! A lot of considerations to take into account! Yes I have also said the same, the more one learns the more one realises one has yet to learn.

I don't have a lot to add, but I always choose to have an open mind, not counting my pennies until they are firmly in my pocket.

   Chris

Chris posted this 02 July 2019

My Friends,

Much to share, one I found it is amazing:

 

WOW, very powerful, Mass of the Jellyfish is nothing to this Vortex Ring!

 

 

 

@Jagau kindly shared a link with me about the Magnetic Field of an Atom:

 

Magnetic field interactions between the atom and the instrument. (Wilke et al., Nature Physics, 2019)

Ref: Science Alert

Using a new technique, scientists have performed the world's smallest magnetic resonance imaging to capture the magnetic fields of single atoms. It's an incredible breakthrough that could improve quantum research, as well as our understanding of the Universe on subatomic scales.

"I am very excited about these results," said physicist Andreas Heinrich of the Institute for Basic Sciences in Seoul. "It is certainly a milestone in our field and has very promising implications for future research."
You're probably most familiar with magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, as a method used to image internal body structures in medicine. An MRI machine uses highly powerful magnets to induce a strong magnetic field around the body, forcing the spin of the protons in the nuclei of your body's hydrogen atoms to align with the magnetic field, all without producing side-effects.

A radiofrequency current is then applied to stimulate the protons, causing them to strain against the field; when this is switched off, sensors can detect the energy released by the protons as they relax back into the magnetic field alignment, and translate this signal into an image.
But for medical MRI scanners, this needs to be occurring en masse, with billions of protons, for the sensors to detect it.

To bring the process down to much finer scales, the researchers used a scanning tunnelling microscope, an instrument that can image surfaces at the atomic scale by running an extremely fine needle over them.

This was used to probe carefully prepared titanium and iron atoms. With a small cluster of magnetised iron atoms attached to the tip, it became a tiny MRI machine, aligning the electrons - rather than the protons - in the sample.

All they needed to do then was add pulses of radiofrequency current, which allowed the sensors to detect the energy released by the electrons, producing an image of the magnetic field of a single titanium or iron atom.

"It turns out that the magnetic interaction we measured depends on the properties of both spins, the one on the tip and the one on the sample," explained physicist Philip Wilke of the Institute for Basic Sciences.
"For example, the signal that we see for iron atoms is vastly different from that for titanium atoms. This allows us to distinguish different kinds of atoms by their magnetic field signature, and makes our technique very powerful."
In addition to this ability to identify the element just from an atom, the technique is so sensitive it can also distinguish atoms that are next to each other.

"It's a really magnificent combination of imaging technologies," physicist Ahmed Duke Shereen of the Advanced Science Research Center in New York told The New York Times. "Medical MRIs can do great characterisation of samples, but not at this small scale."

For such small tech, the team has pretty big plans. They believe it will be extraordinarily useful in mapping the magnetic and spin properties not just of individual atoms, but of larger structures too, such as molecules.
It could also be used to characterise and control quantum systems, which of course would be really handy for the developing field of quantum computing.

"The ability to map spins and their magnetic fields with previously unimaginable precision allows us to gain deeper knowledge about the structure of matter and opens new fields of basic research," Heinrich said.
The research has been published in Nature Physics.

Ref: Science Alert

 

Thanks Jagau for sharing!

As a reminder, we have also seen the Field of an Electron:

Ref: human-resonance.org

 

Researchers have recorded snapshots of electron motion at close to the particle's own natural timescale, which is less than a femtosecond (10-15 seconds). The experiment combines ultrashort light pulses with steady laser light to extract an electron from an atom in a controlled way. With control over the precise moment of extraction, the team was able to cleanly image the electron's quantum state, as they describe in the 22 February Physical Review Letters. This technique could help researchers probe electron-atom interactions in more detail and begin using electrons to observe atoms in the poorly-understood state following ionization.

Ref: human-resonance.org

 

NOTE: It appears the original pages publishing this information have been taken down, I wonder why?

All excellent information!

  Chris

  • Liked by
  • Jagau
  • Vidura
Jagau posted this 02 July 2019

To stay in the same line of thought

another extraordinary site on the power and control of COPPER,

http://www.resonantfractals.org/PCC/PCC.html

that's where I started to understand, Floyd sweet, Bearden and Akula flashlight 

jagau

glennmr2018 posted this 26 July 2019

good article Chris! - and for a real case of implementing//using the Bloch Wall - see here: -   ... .. . 

 

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Feyn2000 posted this 31 July 2019

I thought you might all be interested in this research I came across recently and which fits well into the topic at hand: Maxwell's equations permit a class of solutions that are torus-shaped and are not yet well understood. They are called "flying electromagnetic doughnuts".

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4999368

 

https://www.osa-opn.org/home/newsroom/2018/may/a_recipe_for_flying_electromagnetic_doughnuts/

 

This intertwining of the E- and H-field yields a stable electromagnetic structure, a kind of wave-particle closed in itself. Do you think that this could even be the form of the fundamental particle? Are there free doughnut-particles we could somehow collect and transform into usable energy?

Also I refer you all to Wilbert Smith's coil which, as he claimed, emits exactly this kind of doughnut waves which offer superior communication qualities [with extraterrestrials, as he further claimed] as opposed to classical transverse waves, because, as I understood, it only couples weakly to other "normal" radiation. (http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/smithcl.htm, http://www.rexresearch.com/smith/caduceus3.htm)

Now, I don't know how much these doughnut waves relate to Tesla's purely longitudinal waves... Anyway, this is all just some food for thought I found very interesting.

Chris, keep up the good work. You're doing gods work here.

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Chris
Chris posted this 31 July 2019

Hello and welcome Feyn2000!

Thanks for the research, very interesting and very relivant!

Some years back I remember seeing a Stan Deyo Lecture: @ 54 : 00 around about

 

An interesting video!

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
  • Feyn2000
glennmr2018 posted this 01 August 2019

surprisedfrown Note: This here can be regarded as an artificial Bloch Wall (CHRIS) coolyell

Visualize the Shape of Things Not Yet Seen with Eyes !! ... .. .

Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Advertise here:

Your 233 x 233 image

Content is screened.

Negotiable price.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
Close