Explained What is a Fourier Series? (by drawing circles)

  • 745 Views
  • Last Post 27 December 2018
mrblobby posted this 10 December 2018

From 'Smarter Every Day'

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Prometheus posted this 22 December 2018

Yes, that's because a sinusoid is a circular function.

Here's an exercise: Take a Slinky outside in the bright sun. Hold it so it's perpendicular to the sun's rays and stretch it out. Now look at the shadow... it's a sinusoid.

Why is a sinusoid classified as a circular function? Because a sinusoid is a circle, spread out over space and time.

So when you're looking at a sine wave on your oscilloscope, you're really looking at the shadow of a circle! Unfortunately, we don't have 3-D scopes... they don't exist. But if they did, it'd make it much easier to design and troubleshoot circuits. I guess a scope's Lissajous Curve function comes close, but it's still not 3-D.

You'll note a circle's circumference is equal to 2π radians, and a full wavelength of a sinusoid is also equal to 2π radians.

What is a "radian"? Well, take a piece of string and measure the radius of any given circle. That's the radian length for that circle. If you then lay that piece of string along the line forming the perimeter of that circle, you'll find it takes 6.2831853 string lengths to go fully around the circle. So a "radian" is another word for the radius, geometrically transformed so it lays along the perimeter of the circle. It takes 2π of these radians to go fully around the circumference of the circle. C=2πr.

You'll also note the circle's diameter is equivalent to the sinusoid's peak-to-peak wave height, and its radius is equivalent to the peak wave height.

This goes right down to the quantum mechanical level... think of a bound electron in orbit about its nucleus. The electron must have an integer number of de Broglie wavelengths in its orbit, otherwise a destructive orbit is established which causes the electron to 'spiral inward' until an integer number of de Broglie wavelengths make up its orbital path length.

In other words, the electron must have a full circle or circles in its orbit, or the orbit has destructive interference which lowers orbital energy level. Partial wavelengths (partial circles) are not allowed.

Why is this? Because the electron orbital is a standing wave.

This is the reason why there are discrete electron shells (energy states). These electron shells obey Newton's Second Law.

Now, that comes with a caveat... as an atom becomes more electronically complex, the electron shell model becomes less exact. There aren't really electrons in neat little 1s, 2s, etc. shells, there are electron wavefunctions (standing waves) which resonantly interact to form a single multi-electron wavefunction as the electrons orbit the nucleus, and which we can approximate using the electron shell model.

And that translates up to chemistry... molecules are made up of resonant-frequency atoms, and if the resonances of the atoms making up that molecule are not in resonance with each other, the molecule is less stable. On the same note, if you have an otherwise-stable molecule and add an atom or molecule which disrupts its resonance, that otherwise-stable molecule can become explosively unstable. We'd empirically figured all this out long ago, but it wasn't until just recently that we figured out why it works the way it does, and with an ever-expanding knowledge base bolstered by computer modeling of atoms and molecules, we can form unique molecules which allow us to do things we otherwise wouldn't be able to do.

It's only a matter of time before we discover how to 'unwind' the resonant frequencies of matter directly back into energy... not fusion, not fission... matter degeneration. It would emit a lot of energy... 1 gram of matter (the approximate weight of a US dollar bill) would power a 100 W lightbulb for ~30,000 years or power your 100 HP car engine for ~35 years.

I have an idea of how to do so based upon my knowledge of quantum mechanics, but introducing that to a world which is hell-bent on building weapons of mass destruction and subjugating people would seem to be a bit more than a bit irresponsible. A 10 kg device built as a quantum bomb would make the simultaneous detonation of all the world's nuclear weapons seem like a firecracker by comparison.

alohalaoha posted this 22 December 2018

Tesla

"There is no energy in the matter, only in the Ether". !

Tesla:

"My idea regarding electron contradict those official science. I think electron is a relatively large body carrying a surface charges. It is  not an elementary particle. When such electron leaves the electrode of extremely high potential, it carries an electrostatic charges in many times larger than normal. This may surprise some of those who think that a particle has the same charge in the electrode and outside of it in the air. I was conceived by beautiful and instructive experiment showing that this is not the case, as soon as the particle enters into atmosphere, it becomes a glowing star due to getting rid of excess charge. A huge number of electrostatic charges stored in the particle is responsible for the difficulty of functioning HV electrodes and their rapid deterioration."

  • Liked by
  • Vidura
alohalaoha posted this 22 December 2018

Make simple experiments with two isolated electrostatic bodies charged with two opposite signs and NdFeB magnet and you will see that magnet attract charges of both signs, either with N or S pole.

It further means if we could attract charges, we coud easy concentrate them, example in an electromagnet to further boost magnetic flux to very high levels. High density magnetic flux means we could extract a lot of current in the output pickup coil wounded around electromagent. The whole trick in precise charge injection and sinking aboveunity energy only in precise moments of time. Charge hammer is our HV coil around the previous two. It simply inprint additional charges with currently existed in electromagnet. But if we overdose like charges either in electromagnet or receiving coil everything would burn. Electrostatic is a tremendous Ether's force.

This is a simple principle of FE device - charges injection and charges sink.

But what about charges separation ? Partnered coils will do it for us freely.

Study this Don's book "An Answer to America's Energy Deficit".

https://www.psiram.com/de/index.php/Don_Smith_Generator

 

 

Aloha

   

  • Liked by
  • Chris
  • Vidura
Prometheus posted this 27 December 2018

I created a desmos.com interactive simulation showing how a circle and sinusoid are merely geometrical transforms of the same thing.

Here's the LaTeX code for it:

f\left(x\right)=S_{ize}\cdot \sin \left(x-x_{pos}\right)+y_{pos}\left\{x_{pos}<x<x_{pos}+r_{ad}\right\}

S_{ize}=1

x_{pos}=0

y_{pos}=0

r_{ad}=5.23599

S_{ize}^2=\left(x-x_{pos}\right)^2+\left(y-y_{pos}\right)^2

Table 1:
x_{pos}                     y_{pos}
S_{ize}+x_{pos}                 y_{pos}
x_{pos}                     y_{pos}
S_{ize}\cdot \cos \left(r_{ad}\right)+x_{pos}   S_{ize}\cdot \sin \left(r_{ad}\right)+y_{pos}

Table 2:
x_{pos}                     y_{pos}
S_{ize}\cdot \cos \left(r_{ad}\right)+x_{pos}   y_{pos}
S_{ize}\cdot \cos \left(r_{ad}\right)+x_{pos}   S_{ize}\cdot \sin \left(r_{ad}\right)+y_{pos}

y=S_{ize}\cdot \sin \left(r_{ad}\right)+y_{pos}\left\{S_{ize}\cdot \cos \left(r_{ad}\right)+x_{pos}<x<r_{ad}+x_{pos}\right\}

\left(x_{pos},y_{pos}\right)

You'll have to manually enter the table values. Referring to the graphic helps.

  • Liked by
  • Chris
We're Light Years Ahead!
Members Online:
What is a Scalar:

In physics, scalars are physical quantities that are unaffected by changes to a vector space basis. Scalars are often accompanied by units of measurement, as in "10 cm". Examples of scalar quantities are mass, distance, charge, volume, time, speed, and the magnitude of physical vectors in general.

You need to forget the Non-Sense that some spout with out knowing the actual Definition of the word Scalar! Some people talk absolute Bull Sh*t!

The pressure P in the formula P = pgh, pgh is a scalar that tells you the amount of this squashing force per unit area in a fluid.

A Scalar, having both direction and magnitude, can be anything! The Magnetic Field, a Charge moving, yet some Numb Nuts think it means Magic Science!

Message from God:

Hello my children. This is Yahweh, the one true Lord. You have found creation's secret. Now share it peacefully with the world.

Ref: Message from God written inside the Human Genome

God be in my head, and in my thinking.

God be in my eyes, and in my looking.

God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.

Oh, God be in my heart, and in my understanding.

Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

PayPal De-Platformed me!

They REFUSE to tell me why!

We now use Wise!

Donate
Use E-Mail: Chris at aboveunity.com

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close