Connecting the dots to Energy - The A-Field

  • Topic Is Sticky
  • 255 Views
  • Last Post 2 weeks ago
Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

My Friends,

We live in a different world! One where we need as much help and support as we can get! We must Unite, we must share and Help Each Other, Love one another and work together, we must do what we can to make tomorrow better than today!

Remember, I am still learning, I never expect to know everything, however, I really try, hard, to learn as much as I can, everyday!

I cant yet predict these machines, I do however, have a pretty good idea how they work! Perhaps as high as 99%.

We have had Many Successes!

Everyone starting out, they should start here: Builders Guide to Aboveunity Machines, this thread will help others build a very solid background on the Technology we are Sharing!

This thread is designed to, its objective is, to help others following the Required Goals. If others follow the basic Outline, then they will Succeed! Many tend to go off track and they end up with an Experiment that is not anywhere near inline with the Non-Inductive Coil Experiment! I cant explain why some people do this, but many do! These People need to Force themselves to stay in line and this Guide will help others with this issue:

 

The Goal

The goal is to Power a Load, with Electrical Energy, Energy that we do not have to Pay for, Free Energy, a term that is bastardised and twisted by many to mean impossible non-sense by many! Energy can not be Created and every normal Human Being knows this, it can not be destroyed either! What Science does not tell you, they have no idea, whatsoever, where the Electrical Energy comes from in an Electrical Generator!

 

The Electrical Generator

The Electrical Generator, produces a Voltage ( V ) and a Current ( I ) Flows, determined by Ohms Law: V / R = I, where R = Resistance, been used for 189 Years approximately in different forms, linked directly to Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction!

 

Electromagnetic Induction

Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction was discovered in 1931, and independently in 1832 by Joseph Henry.

Faraday's law of induction (briefly, Faraday's law) is a basic law of electromagnetism predicting how a magnetic field will interact with an electric circuit to produce an electromotive force (EMF)—a phenomenon known as electromagnetic induction. It is the fundamental operating principle of transformers, inductors, and many types of electrical motors, generators and solenoids.

Ref: Faraday's Law of Induction

 

Two equations exist for Electromagnetic Induction: E.M.F = -NdΦ/dt and E.M.F = Bvl, Maxwell has modified these equations and used a completely different approach: 

 

Voltage ( V )

The product of the above Equations is E.M.F, which is a quantity measured in Units of Volts.

The volt (symbol: V) is the derived unit for electric potential, electric potential difference (voltage), and electromotive force. It is named after the Italian physicist Alessandro Volta (1745–1827).

Ref: The Volt

 

One volt is defined as the difference in electric potential between two points of a conducting wire, when an electric current of one ampere dissipates one watt of power between those points. Equivalently, it is the potential difference between two points that will impart one joule of energy per coulomb of charge that passes through it. It can be expressed in terms of SI base units (m, kg, s, and A).

 

Charge ( Q )

Charge is the fundamental property of forms of matter that exhibit electrostatic attraction or repulsion in the presence of other matter. Electric charge is a characteristic property of many subatomic particles. The charges of free-standing particles are integer multiples of the elementary charge e; we say that electric charge is quantized. Michael Faraday, in his electrolysis experiments, was the first to note the discrete nature of electric charge. Robert Millikan's oil drop experiment demonstrated this fact directly, and measured the elementary charge. It has been discovered that one type of particle, quarks, have fractional charges of either −1/3 or +2/3, but it is believed they always occur in multiples of integral charge; free-standing quarks have never been observed.

By convention, the charge of an electron is negative, −e, while that of a proton is positive, +e. Charged particles whose charges have the same sign repel one another, and particles whose charges have different signs attract. Coulomb's law quantifies the electrostatic force between two particles by asserting that the force is proportional to the product of their charges, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The charge of an antiparticle equals that of the corresponding particle, but with opposite sign.

Ref: Electric charge

 

There are two types of electric charge: Positive and Negative, commonly carried by protons and electrons respectively. Like charges repel each other and unlike charges attract each other.

Charge is quantized: it comes in integer multiples of individual small units called the elementary charge, e, about 1.602×10−19 Coulombs.

 

Current ( I )

The conventional symbol for current is I, which originates from the French phrase intensité du courant, (current intensity). Current intensity is often referred to simply as current. The I symbol was used by André-Marie Ampère, after whom the unit of electric current is named, in formulating Ampère's force law (1820). The notation travelled from France to Great Britain, where it became standard, although at least one journal did not change from using C to I until 1896.

Ref: Electric Current

 

One Ampere of Current is equivalent to 6.24 x 1018 Electrons / Second past Terminal T1. Current is a Rate of Flow or Charge ( Q ), One Ampere, which is equal to One Coulomb: 

 

Coulomb ( C )

The Coulomb is a very important quantity! The definition is:

The coulomb (symbol: C) is the International System of Units (SI) unit of electric charge. Under the 2019 redefinition of the SI base units, which took effect on 20 May 2019, the coulomb is exactly 1/1.602176634×10−19 (approximately 6.2415090744×1018, or 1.036×10−5 mol) elementary charges. The same number of electrons has the same magnitude but opposite sign of charge, that is, a charge of −1 C.

Ref: The Coulomb

 

One Coulomb of Charge is Equal to 6.2415090744×1018 Electrons, stationary, not including any movement.

NOTE: This value: 6.2415090744×1018 is the same as One Ampere: 6.2415090744×1018. The Difference is Time.

Capacitors Store Charge Q, and the Capacity is measured in Units of Farads ( F ) or multiples there of. Charge Q on a Capacitor is: Q = C ⋅ V Where Q is in Coulombs.

The SI system defines the coulomb in terms of the ampere and second: 1 C = 1 A × 1 s. The 2019 redefinition of the ampere and other SI base units fixed the numerical value of the elementary charge when expressed in coulombs, and therefore fixed the value of the coulomb when expressed as a multiple of the fundamental charge (the numerical values of those quantities are the multiplicative inverses of each other). The ampere is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the elementary charge e to be 1.602176634×10−19 coulomb.

Thus, one coulomb is the charge of 6241509074460762607.776 elementary charges, where the number is the reciprocal of 1.602176634×10−19 C.

Ref: The Coulomb

 

The Coulomb is a very important Quantity, defining the Charge Volume: 6.2415090744×1018 Electrons. Where each Electron is: 1.602×10−19 Coulombs. What we call the Elementary Charge.

 

The Mole ( mol )

The mole (symbol - mol) is the unit of measurement for amount of substance in the International System of Units (SI). A mole of a substance or a mole of particles is defined as exactly 6.02214076×1023 particles, which may be atoms, molecules, ions, or electrons. In short, for particles 1 mol = 6.02214076×1023.

The current definition was adopted in November 2018 as one of the seven SI base units, revising the previous definition that specified it as the number of atoms in 12 grams of carbon-12 (12C), an isotope of carbon.

The number 6.02214076×1023 (the Avogadro number) was chosen so that the mass of one mole of a chemical compound in grams is numerically equal, for most practical purposes, to the average mass of one molecule of the compound in daltons. Thus, for example, one mole of water contains 6.02214076×1023 molecules, whose total mass is about 18.015 grams – and the mean mass of one molecule of water is about 18.015 daltons.

Ref: The Mole

 

I hope you see a connection here, this is directly connected to Einstein's Mass Energy Equivalence.

 

Mass Energy Equivalence ( E = MC2 )

 

In physics, mass–energy equivalence is the principle that anything having mass has an equivalent amount of energy and vice versa. These fundamental quantities are directly related to one another according to Albert Einstein's famous formula: E = MC2

This formula states that mass has an equivalent energy (E) which can be calculated as mass (m) multiplied by the speed of light squared (c2). Similarly, energy has an equivalent mass (m) which can be calculated as energy (E) divided by the speed of light squared (c2). Because the speed of light is a large number in everyday units (approximately 3×108 m/s), the formula implies that even an everyday object at rest with a modest amount of mass has a very large amount of intrinsic energy. Chemical reactions, nuclear reactions, and other energy transformations may cause a system to lose some of its energy content to the environment (and thus some corresponding mass), for example, by releasing it as thermal energy or as radiant energy, such as light.

Ref: Mass–energy equivalence

 

 

Power ( P )

Power ( P ), is a Volumetric Quantity, this means:

of, concerning, or using measurement by volume: volumetric analysis Compare gravimetric

Ref: Volumetric Definition

 

This means, we have a Rate of Flow, or Current ( I ), at a specific Charge ( Q ), determined by Voltage ( V ), the difference in Potential, or the difference of Elementary Charges from one terminal to the Other.

Instantaneously, Voltage V x Current I = Power P, over Time t, where One Volt x One Ampere I for the duration of One Second = One Wat Second, or One Joule:

 

The Joule ( J )

The Joule ( J ) is a Unit of Energy:

The joule (/dʒaʊl, dʒuːl/ jowl, jool; symbol: J) is a derived unit of energy in the International System of Units. It is equal to the energy transferred to (or work done on) an object when a force of one newton acts on that object in the direction of the force's motion through a distance of one metre (1 newton metre or N⋅m). It is also the energy dissipated as heat when an electric current of one ampere passes through a resistance of one ohm for one second. It is named after the English physicist James Prescott Joule (1818–1889).

Ref: The Joule

 

The Joule is Work, the work done in a System, equivalent to Force.

 

Force ( F )

One of My Favorites, Force ( F ). Edgar Cayce said: 

There was, there is, as we find, only three of the creations as is given, matter force and mind.

 

The Definition of Force is:

In physics, a force is any interaction that, when unopposed, will change the motion of an object. A force can cause an object with mass to change its velocity (which includes to begin moving from a state of rest), i.e., to accelerate. Force can also be described intuitively as a push or a pull. A force has both magnitude and direction, making it a vector quantity. It is measured in the SI unit of newtons and represented by the symbol F.

The original form of Newton's second law states that the net force acting upon an object is equal to the rate at which its momentum changes with time. If the mass of the object is constant, this law implies that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on the object, is in the direction of the net force, and is inversely proportional to the mass of the object.

Concepts related to force include: thrust, which increases the velocity of an object; drag, which decreases the velocity of an object; and torque, which produces changes in rotational speed of an object. In an extended body, each part usually applies forces on the adjacent parts; the distribution of such forces through the body is the internal mechanical stress. Such internal mechanical stresses cause no acceleration of that body as the forces balance one another. Pressure, the distribution of many small forces applied over an area of a body, is a simple type of stress that if unbalanced can cause the body to accelerate. Stress usually causes deformation of solid materials, or flow in fluids.

Ref: Force

 

Work, getting a sweat up, lifting against the Force of Gravity, anything that requires effort: Work, requires a Force to achieve moving, lifting, or similar.

 

Magnetomotive Force ( M.M.F )

The term magnetomotive force was coined by Henry Augustus Rowland in 1880. Rowland intended this to indicate a direct analogy with electromotive force. The idea of a magnetic analogy to electromotive force can be found much earlier in the work of Michael Faraday (1791-1867) and it is hinted at by James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879). However, Rowland coined the term and was the first to make explicit an Ohm's law for magnetic circuits in 1873.

Ref: Magnetomotive Force

 

The SI Unit of Magnetomotive Force ( M.M.F ) is the Ampere, the same as the Unit of Current, analogously the Units of E.M.F and Voltage V are both the Volt. Informally, and frequently, this unit is stated as the Ampere-Turn AT to avoid confusion with Current.

The Equations:

  • FM.M.F = NI
  • FM.M.F = 2 W / Φ
  • FM.M.F = ΦR
  • FM.M.F = HL

 

Where:

  • N is the number of turns in the Coil.
  • I is the Current through the Coil.
  • W is the energy in Joules.
  • Φ is the Magnetic Flux.
  • R is the Magnetic Reluctance.
  • H is the Magnetizing Force.
  • L is the mean length of a solenoid or the circumference of a toroid.

 

Here is a good Resource.

Magnetomotive Force is a critical aspect, Current through a Coil Turns ( N ), of Impedance, or 1/R, the Inverse of Resistance, which is Conductance.

 

Ampere-Turns ( AT )

Although Ampere Turns is old, and not used very much any more, it is still very useful:

The ampere-turn (At) is the MKS (Metres, Kilograms, Seconds) unit of magnetomotive force (MMF), represented by a direct current of one ampere flowing in a single-turn loop in a vacuum. "Turns" refers to the winding number of an electrical conductor composing an inductor.

The ampere-turn is equal to 4/π gilberts, the equivalent CGS unit.

Ref: Ampere-Turn

 

Ampere-Turns is an easy unit, simply: 10 Turns ( N ) at 10 Amperes ( I ) = 10 x 10 = 100 Ampere Turns.

 

Conductance ( G )

The ability of a Conductor, to Conduct Current:

The resistance of an object depends in large part on the material it is made of. Objects made of electrical insulators like rubber tend to have very high resistance and low conductivity, while objects made of electrical conductors like metals tend to have very low resistance and high conductivity. This relationship is quantified by resistivity or conductivity. The nature of a material is not the only factor in resistance and conductance, however; it also depends on the size and shape of an object because these properties are extensive rather than intensive. For example, a wire's resistance is higher if it is long and thin, and lower if it is short and thick. All objects resist electrical current, except for superconductors, which have a resistance of zero.

The resistance R of an object is defined as the ratio of voltage V across it to current I through it, while the conductance G is the reciprocal.

Ref: Electrical resistance and conductance

 

You can see, it is not only clear, but it is obvious, we need to build an Electron Pump! Using M.M.F to Pump, do work on Electrons.

 

 

If you want more information, I would recommend starting here.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends

   Chris

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

My Friends,

This post relates to: The Lorentz Force.

To Power a Load, we need Voltage and Current at the required Potentials for the duration t.

Floyd Sparky Sweet wrote under the Title: THE MOTIONAL E-FIELD

A motionally induced E-field is actually created within the space occupied by the moving magnetic flux described above. This field is present therein, whether or not a conductor is present in the space. In terms of a definition we can say that, when magnetic flux of vector intensity B moved across a region of space with vector velocity V, electromagnetically induced electric field vector B x V appears in the space at right angles to both B and V. Therefore, E = B x V.

Ref: Floyd Sparky Sweet Nothing is Something

 

This: B x V is Flux Cutting by definition:

 

He went on to write:

The principle of superposition states that; "In order to calculate the resultant intensity of superimposed fields, each field must be dealt with individually as though the other were not present".

The resultant is obtained by vector addition ( 1 + -1 = 0 ) of each field considered singularly. Consider for a moment the construction of the triode which includes the bifilar coils located within the fields of the two conditioned magnets.

When the current in one half of the conductors in the coils (i.e., one of the bifilar elements in each coil) of the device is moving up, both the current and the magnetic field follow the right-hand rule:

 

The resultant motional E-field would be vertical to both and inwardly directed.

At the same time the current in the other half of the conductors in the coils is moving down and both the current and magnetic field follow the right-hand rule:

 

The resulting motional E-field is again vertical to both and inwardly directed.

Thus, the resultant field intensity is double the intensity attributable to either one of the set of coil conductors taken singularly.

Expressed mathematically:  E = (B x V) + (-B x -V) = 2 (B x V)

 

Floyd also gave us the following:

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E / 2 to E.

 

Floyd Sweet is talking about E.M.F = Bvl, but then goes on to describe Transformer Induction.

NOTE: I believe Floyd Sweet meant to link the "Motionally induced E-Field" to the "Magnetic A Vector Potential" and never really did. Floyd Sweet does state: 

The nature of the motionally induced electric field is quite unique;

in order understand it more fully we must start by parting with a few misleading paradigms. When magnetic flux is moved perpendicularly across a conductor an electromotive force (E.M.F) is electromagnetically induced "within" the conductor. 

"Within" is an artefact of the commonly used analogy comparing the flow of electric current within a wire to the flow of water within a pipe.

This is a most misleading model theoretically. The true phenomenon taking place has little been thought of as involving the production of a spatially distributed electric field.

We can see that the model's origins likely arose from the operation called "flux cutting", a most deceiving and misleading term.

A better term, "time varying flux modulation", does not imply any separation of lines of flux.

Truly, lines of flux are always in closure upon themselves and are mathematically expressed as line integrals.

It is fallacious to use the term "cutting", which implies time varying separation which does not in fact ever occur.

 

Floyd Sweet did not like the Flux Cutting Idea, he was looking for a better way to describe what he saw!

Sir Richard Feynman agreed with Floyd Sweet and said this:

 

Here is an image of a Charged Particle in a Uniform Magnetic Field:

 

You can clearly see, there is a Circular motion of the Charged Particle, and the Charged Particles Force, is directed toward the Center of the Flux. We know, the Charged particle will never reach the Center of the Flux, Centrifugal  Forces and various other reasons: Flux Density and so on. But isn't this amazing, a Charge moving, in a Magnetic Field makes this amazing path! Well, its something we have known for a long time!

Curl, or the Circular motion is also seen here:

 

Now, if one did not know better, one would say we are looking at one in the same things here! Are we? Is the Electric Field, known as the Magnetic A Vector Potential, that of each Elementary Charge in a Circular Motion? The Vector Forces are the same, they all line up. Even the Math lines up: E = B x V  with some rearranging = F = Bev.

We have a problem however, this can only be detected when there is a Change!

If we move a Coil in this proximity, when all the Flux, Φ or Phi, is completely contained in the Core, we can not detect the Magnetic A Vector Potential, this experiment is seen here: 

 

Sorry for the Sound, that was a long time ago, I was not very experienced in Video Editing. I got a Copyright Strike from this video.

This Video shows, specifically, Flux Cutting: E.M.F = Bvl. This Video does not show Flux Linking Law: E.M.F = -N dPhi/dt. Better known as Transformer Induction.

Floyd Sweet wrote about Transformer Induction, indirectly:

FIELD SUPER-POSITION AND THE VACUUM TRIODE


Electromagnetic induction with no measurable magnetic field is not new. It is well known that in the space surrounding a properly wound toroidal coil there is no magnetic field.

This is due to the superposition of the fields. However, when alternating current is surging through a transformer an electric field surrounds it.

When we apply the principle of superposition to the vacuum triode it becomes more obvious how the device is in fact operating.

The principle of superposition states that; "In order to calculate the resultant intensity of superimposed fields, each field must be dealt with individually as though the other were not present".

The resultant is obtained by vector addition of each field considered singularly.

 

Don't forget, Floyd Sweet was a true Transformer Expert:

 

Let me present this Video Clip again:

 

Please review, carefully, and look for the A Field or similar references:

 

Here is the Video Snippet:

 

Now, listen to what Tom Bearden said about The MEG:

 

My Friends, we have a direct link here! We have conclusive evidence, and a lot of it, that we are looking at the use of the Magnetic A Vector Potential.

I risk Copyright, but here is The MEG Video, or the Cut of it: 

 

Now I ask you, in light of such a great deal of Evidence, what do you think now?

Floyd Sweet told us:

A better term, "time varying flux modulation", does not imply any separation of lines of flux.

 

Clemente Figuera said:

PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION - Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion, is that the turns of the induced circuit approaches and moves away from the magnetic centers of the inductor magnet or electromagnets, and those turns, while spinning, go through sections of the magnetic field of different power, because, while this has its maximum attraction in the center of the core of each electromagnet, this action will weaken as the induced is separated from the center of the electromagnet, to increase again, when the induced is approaching the center of another electromagnet with opposite sign to the first one.

 

Almost exactly the same things! They use the Motional Electric Field, or The Magnetic A Vector Potential. A is the Electric Field with Curl, two equal and opposite ∇ + -∇ = 0, the Curl cancels via Superposition and we get a Straight Electric Field, Ā.

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends

   Chris

 

P.S: As far as I know, John Bedini never released the documents he briefly shows in the Video! Not really a problem, we have a ton of Data, and most of it looks like Red Herring Material.

Attached Files

Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

My Friends,

From the Video:

 

The Image:

 

I have transcribed into the following document: Tom Bearden Document shown by John Bedini about Floyd Sweet on the A Field.pdf

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends

   Chris

Attached Files

Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

My Friends,

Richard Feynman, in his very famous: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, made the Magnetic A Vector Potential standard Science.

Here is: Volume 2, Chapter 15, The Vector Potential: I am sorry, I have been forced to remove this resource due to Copyright

 

It is very interesting Feynman talks about Work Canceling and work can = 0, or "No Work Done" in some situations. Again, Vector Addition: W + -W = 0. Also, notice the continued references to Waves and Wavelength!

I want to point out, at the end of the attached pdf, you see in the Conclusion:

 

Floyd Sweet made the same observation:

 

Below you will find the pdf for Chapter 15, the Magnetic A Vector Potential, referred to as the A-Field by Tom Bearden, is depicted here:

 

 

What is A? Take a Charge, and move it at close to the Speed of Light, and the wake it leaves behind it looks like this, a Cone Shape, in a circle, it creates a Toroidal Electric Field:

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends

   Chris

Attached Files

Chris posted this 3 weeks ago

My Friends,

In Floyd Sweet's Lab Notes, before Tom Bearden was around, the ones that were supposedly stolen, which were not, Floyd Sweet makes several unusual references.

The most important is, if one searches the term: "Oscillator" the 12th and last time it is displayed, one gets:

 

A Vector Oscillator

 

This is not the first time Floyd Sweet refers to the VTA as an Oscillator! He does refer to it, as an Oscillator several times:

 

You will find other references, but some are not as obvious! The Magnetic A Vector Potential, in other Words, as Floyd Sweet said:

The source of energy is unlimited, the virtual vacuum of space itself structured by a motional electromagnetic field is the powerhouse.

...

A better term, "time varying flux modulation", does not imply any separation of lines of flux.

 

Remember, a simple flick of the Switch, the VTA sprang into life:

 

In combination with our experiments, I do believe we have many more answers than some may realise!

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friends

   Chris

baerndorfer posted this 2 weeks ago

so what i understand from the information above is, that some of us use the Aharonov-Bohm effect. It depends on core material if this effect happens or not. Bearden and Don Smith are talking about Metglas material (nanostructure). This material will encapsulate all of the magnetic component (B-field) inside the core. There is no magnetic field on the outside of the transformer because it is in an localized area now. When we can manage this (some of us did) nature will 'unhide' the second component of the Vector-A-potential (uncurled string) for us which we can see now in form of an E-field (outside the core material). This E-field is as we know dA/dt - so the time rate of change is important. the faster the switching, the stronger the magnitude of the field.

if we cannot get this material there is a second way to achieve this effect. we have to build coils which have an toroidal shape.

like this thread very much - thx guys!

 

 

 

Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

Hey Baerndorfer,

I believe you are correct! 

I have done a lot of study on the A Vector Potential, and learnt a lot, but still have a bit to learn yet!

 

I believe the same effect is present if we consider a Single Flux Line with no Core.

In this regard, I am not sure I would say this depends on a Core, perhaps is a little easier to manage with a Core? Provides a greater application with a Core?

The Long Solenoid Experiment is well worth studding in my opinion, the same effects are visible with no Core.

 

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • baerndorfer
Chris posted this 2 weeks ago

My Friends,

A video instead of typing for an hour:

 

Don't forget our Calculators Guys and Gals: Aboveunity.com Member Calculator and here hyiq.org Calculators.

Best wishes, stay safe and well My Friend

   Chris

  • Liked by
  • baerndorfer
  • Fighter
Aboveunity.com awesome starts here! - Thank You L0stf0x
Members Online:
Since Nov 27 2018
Recomended Protocol:
Your Support:

More than anything else, your contributions to this forum are most important! We are trying to actively get all visitors involved, but we do only have a few main contributors, which are very much appreciated! If you would like to see more pages with more detailed experiments and answers, perhaps a contribution of another type maybe possible:

Donate (PayPal)

The content I am sharing is not only unique, but is changing the world as we know it! Please Support Us!

Donate (Patreon)

Thank You So Much!

Weeks High Earners:
The great Nikola Tesla:

Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point of the universe. This idea is not novel. Men have been led to it long ago go by instinct or reason. It has been expressed in many ways, and in many places, in the history of old and new. We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who drives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians, and in many hints and statements of thinkers of the present time. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static, our hopes are in vain; if kinetic - and this we know it is for certain - then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature.

Experiments With Alternate Currents Of High Potential And High Frequency (February 1892).

Close